he coudnt beat santos, he coudnt beat paul williams (whos a welterweight but should be higher), he would get destroyed by pavlik, or arthur abraham, I know he beat cotto but to me its almost the same as dela hoya beating pacman. Cotto is 5'7 margarito is 5'11 (so they say he fkn looks at least 6 feet.)
Exposed? Exposed as what? The definition of exposed is when a fighter feasts on chumps steps up his competition and loses then he is exposed as a such. Margarito has faced world class competiton and won and in his loss to P-Will it was a close fight. So when he fights world class fighters he does well so could he be exposed?
So at 54 you mean to tell me V Phillips,C Spinks or S Martinez would expose Margo? Or young prospects like Greene,Kirkland,JUlio or Angulo would expose Margo at 54? GET A CLUE! As far as Pavlik and Abraham those are big middleweights who have fought at 68 and soon will be in that class for good and are the best in the world in there classes so that would be tough for Margo having never fought at 60. Finally, comparing Cotto-margo to Pacquaio taking on DLH is RETARDED. Cotto was the top 147LB and has fought in that class for a year and a half while Pac has never fought above 35 (and that was once) . How long have you been watching boxing?
In terms of skills & fighting, he would suck at either of those weights but the problem is that there's really no one at 154 so I could actually see him doing pretty good maybe. A few years ago when 154 had some big guns then he would get killed
with this said is he still a top 10 p4p fighter?
my top ten
1.Manny pac
2.joe calzage
3.Juan m m
4.Vazques
5.mijares
6.Pavlikc
7.hopkins
8.calderon
9.margarito
10.cotto
He does decent with a 50percent chance of winning fights at 154 but 160 I cannot see ANYWAY he competes with the aa's and pavlicks!
with this said is he still a top 10 p4p fighter?