Since 900,000 threads were started in regards to Tito vs. Margarito and some people were biased enough to pick Margarito, I pose the question:
How would Margarito fair against a prime BHop at 160?
Margarito would probably win, Hopkins is overrated.
He had a record 20 middleweight defenses and according to you he would lose to a welterweight and to top it all off Hopkins is overrated....
Some people are flat out stupid like yourself...
It says Joe is shot.
For real, but he still won by 5 rounds.
If you had Joe winning by 5 rounds, you should be stoned to death.
BHop is 6 or 7 years older than Joe. Prime BHop beats Joe convincingly.
It says Joe is shot.
For real, but he still won by 5 rounds.
Just shut the fuck up already...When they fought...he barley got the win...He got a SD over a 43 year old....Be for real man....Cut the shit!!
Margarito would probably win, Hopkins is overrated.
LOL OKAAAAAAYYYY bro.
Hopkins KO, round 8.
Not a fair question though, considering Margarito is a WW.....
Margarito would probably win, Hopkins is overrated.
:kabong:
So why is that one of Joe's best wins if he's so overrated..Damn dude you're dumb as hell...You want people to respect your opinion but you say dumb ass shit like this...Its kinda hard to like Calzaghe with bitch made fans like yourself! PATHETIC!
:bryce: