WHYY do people always go on about calzaghe picking "old timers" .
Calzaghe is 36!!!
Roy is only THREE YEARS older, that is nothing.
Joe has always been fighting younger opponents, so whats the big deal with fighting roy whos only 3 years older?
Do you really expect a champ at thje end of his career to be fighting the up and coming stars?
i still think he would cause trouble for pavlik.
because his career is a joke
if Calzaghe's career is a joke then i am rapidly spiraling towards depression about my career and every other normal person i knows.
an undefeated world champion for ten years and a multi millionaire....
Yeah thats a joke of a career..
How many world titles have you held? and at how many weight divisions?
None so you are in no position to call his career a joke
Hopkins was 43. Calzaghe, Hopkins and Roy should have been fighting each other 8 years ago.
yeh but its no good talking about what "should" of happened!
"hopkins would of knocked joe out in his prime. WOW , when hopkins was 7 , and joe was a baby, bhop would of killed him!
your just looking for an excuse to defend a lost fight!
and im just waiting till after the Jones fight for people to say:
"jones was much older, out of his prime , etc etc
it dont matter, a fight is a fight.
plus 3 years is NOTHING!
its not calzaghes problem jones has not kept up his form. :bottle: