All you poor dearies not on the Manny bandwagon, well, it's too late, you're already on.
Manny stepped up and beat the current Ring #2 lightweight and beat him badly.
He's already beat up the current Ring #1 superfeather twice, sending him in semi retirement to peanutspalookaville for 4 yrs.
He also beat up the current Ring #2 featherweight.
Not to mention he's already beaten up the previous Ring belt holders/HOFers at feather and superfeather in a series of fights that left them damaged and retired.
I suggest you not jump off the Manny bandwagon yet or you'll look like JMM's clone, dazed, confused, and contused on the canvas.
No, there will be a pause eventually. Law of physics says what goes up must come down, but you dearies need to be a little closer to the ground when you drop off the screaming Manny bandwagon.
Cheers now..........
thats true guzman hasn't really beat anybody but has an incredible ability maybe a future legend, plus his trained by a mayweather
He beat Humberto Soto - pretty easily too - who I would say is world's better than that shot version of Morales Diaz "beat."
If you discount Diaz as a noob then so much more your idiocy.
There is nobody in the 135 division which could inflict such a beating on Diaz the way Pac did.
And it has been established that Gayweather is a coward who talks big yet pisses on his pants.
You don't need to further prove that Gayweather is a coward.
The only idiocy I see is you claiming Pac has cemented his status as ATG because he beat Diaz.
Considering Marquez clearly edged the second fight, I don't see how the words "beat up on" apply, especially as Pacquiao was completely spent at the end.
Additionally, numerical rankings mean nothing when they're illegitimate. Casamayor, Campbell, and Juan Diaz are all superior fighters to David, and with Marquez moving up tack on another.
the knockdown was the difference.
How do you "clearly edge" a fight? Surely if it is clear it is not edged.
Winning by 1 or 2 points. A small margin of victory can still be quite clear...
Considering Marquez clearly edged the second fight, I don't see how the words "beat up on" apply, especially as Pacquiao was completely spent at the end.
Additionally, numerical rankings mean nothing when they're illegitimate. Casamayor, Campbell, and Juan Diaz are all superior fighters to David, and with Marquez moving up tack on another.
How do you "clearly edge" a fight? Surely if it is clear it is not edged.
Considering Marquez clearly edged the second fight, I don't see how the words "beat up on" apply, especially as Pacquiao was completely spent at the end.
Additionally, numerical rankings mean nothing when they're illegitimate. Casamayor, Campbell, and Juan Diaz are all superior fighters to David, and with Marquez moving up tack on another.