Who will unify the Lightweight Division?

only campbell and juan diaz has shown any interest in unifying... everyone else just wants paydays and people wonder why boxing is not popular anymore and no one knows who the champions are......

With all the great fights coming up and great matchup possibilities at 135 , who has the best chance at unifying the division? I've included the 3 Super Featherweights that I believe will be jumping to 135 as well. only campbell and juan diaz has shown any interest in unifying... everyone else just wants paydays

What the hell? no Michael Katsidis in the poll? meh... give me a break guys...... i only had 10 spots. i explained why i couldn't make space for amir and michael.

There's the propects as well like Amir Khan, Gamboa (if he decides to move up which i'm sure he will after winning at title at 130.

The more reason why they will lose in either 5 or 6 bro. They can't hold to a lead that big. I'm in an office where almost everybody is rooting for the lakers. Believe me bro, pinas is a lakers country. There's only me and another guy rooting for celtics but I'm a pistons fan and was rooting for boston just for the heck of it. Lol I wanna piss them lakers fans in the office. Good luck with your hollywood script, you may wake up a game or two from now having a nightmare haha. PBA man, I think it's only in the PBA where a team down 1-3 in the finals was able to sweep the 3 remaining games. And btw, alaska sucks big time. :D pinas is lakers country because pinoys are smart and know good basketball. pistons? celtics? lottery team in 2 years. celtics better hope they win this year. lakers aren't even at 100% this year. wait 'til next year when pau gets used to the triangle and our center is back and pau is a power forward. the future is bright for the lakers. if we lose this year...... might be the worse year we have in the next 4-5 years. dynasty baby!!! dude , i left pinas when i was 1st grade at don bosco. i don't know who's good anymore. i didn't even know ginebra. all i remember was san miguel and alaska. i like alaska 'cause i use to drink it when i was a kid.

the lakers fucked up last night. how the hell do you lose up by 24? they were up by 20 halfway through the 3rd...... i have faith...... the season has been drama. what's more dramatic than coming back down 3-1 and the mvp leading the way? it's been a script so far this season. scripts are written in hollywood baby. ginebra? shell? minor league...... GO ALASKA!!!The more reason why they will lose in either 5 or 6 bro. They can't hold to a lead that big. I'm in an office where almost everybody is rooting for the lakers. Believe me bro, pinas is a lakers country. There's only me and another guy rooting for celtics but I'm a pistons fan and was rooting for boston just for the heck of it. Lol I wanna piss them lakers fans in the office. Good luck with your hollywood script, you may wake up a game or two from now having a nightmare haha. PBA man, I think it's only in the PBA where a team down 1-3 in the finals was able to sweep the 3 remaining games. And btw, alaska sucks big time. :D

a ha ha biglang nagtagalog LOL. No hard feelings bro and don't take it seriously. Lakers will lose just like all the others who buried themselves 1-3. Only Ginebra can defy statistics and I was rooting for shell. the lakers fucked up last night. how the hell do you lose up by 24? they were up by 20 halfway through the 3rd...... i have faith...... the season has been drama. what's more dramatic than coming back down 3-1 and the mvp leading the way? it's been a script so far this season. scripts are written in hollywood baby. ginebra? shell? minor league...... GO ALASKA!!!

Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons: 1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts 2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP. 3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator. 4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time. We don't know how many of the titles will be on the line if Campbell and Guzman fight, the WBO title will definitely be on the line, not sure about the IBF & WBA.

Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons: 1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts 2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP. 3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator. 4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time. if manny doesn't go to 140. i agree it's between nate/joan or casa for the ring belt. i don't know what's more important to manny the ring or the org belts......but more than likely the money which is why i foresee a hatton fight. if he does go with the nate/joan winner then i wish you luck and hope nate wins. nate's a good guy and he's getting older and he deserves the money a pacquiao fight will get him. plus i'd rather see him win than joan and as a manny fan i'd rather see him face nate.

tumahimik ka gago. nothing sweeter than winning the finals......except being the 1st team to do it down 3-1.a ha ha biglang nagtagalog LOL. No hard feelings bro and don't take it seriously. Lakers will lose just like all the others who buried themselves 1-3. Only Ginebra can defy statistics and I was rooting for shell.

@left hook tua- one thing i'm sure of is that lakers will get ktfo in a game or two LOL. tumahimik ka gago. nothing sweeter than winning the finals......except being the 1st team to do it down 3-1.

Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons: 1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts 2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP. 3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator. 4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time. Very informative post. Good K for you.

@left hook tua- one thing i'm sure of is that lakers will get ktfo in a game or two LOL.

well i'm sorry if i insulted you but that wasn't my intention. that sarcastic remark was made as a offhand comment that joan's promoter is positioning him for a fight with manny. as you know one of the most popular things to talk about is predicting what fights are gonna be made next and i was just trying to ask if a guzman-pacquiao fight might be upcoming. Well, I think the Campbell-Guzman winner is clearly the front runner to get the Pac fight for a number of reasons: 1. They will have 3 of the 4 belts 2. Neither fighter has any affiliation with Golden Boy. The Top Rank-GBP settlement dictates that if Top Rank puts Pac in with any GBP fighters, then Top Rank has to give GBP 50% of the promotion. Nate is with me and Don King, and Sycuan bought out GBP's interest in Guzman. So it makes alot of $$$ sense for Arum to look at the winner of this fight, because it doesnt involve GBP. 3. Only 1 fighter in history has held all 4 titles at the same time, and that was Hopkins. If the Campbell-Guzman winner fights the Pacquiao-D. Diaz winner, the winner of that fight will be only the 2nd person in history to hold all 4 belts. That's a pretty powerful motivator. 4. Arum can't stand Shaeffer. And he's going to like him even less now that GBP is going to put a show on the same night as his Latin Fury PPV, that he had scheduled for quite some time.

That's one tough question to resolve. I guess this will be resolved in the later part of 2009 or early 2010.

Because by implying that there was some foolishness in Guzman becoming our WBO mandatory and we said nothing and did not protest, that would mean that we either were either a party to it, weren't "involved" but went along with it, or were too stupid to know they shouldnt have been able to do it. Any one of those 3 choices is an insult. well i'm sorry if i insulted you but that wasn't my intention. that sarcastic remark was made as a offhand comment that joan's promoter is positioning him for a fight with manny. as you know one of the most popular things to talk about is predicting what fights are gonna be made next and i was just trying to ask if a guzman-pacquiao fight might be upcoming.

The division is so good i have no idea.

i wasn't making an allegation as much as i was making a sarcastic implication. why would you take offense to it if it wasn't directed at you? you guys are not joan's promoter. is it not fair to say that joan's promoter wants a crack at the cashcow at 135 which is manny right now? i'm sure nate's guys are making plans to position a title bout with manny aren't they? how does it make nate look bad if he's fighting one of the top guys and a champion at 130? a guy who many feel should be top 10 p4p? Because by implying that there was some foolishness in Guzman becoming our WBO mandatory and we said nothing and did not protest, that would mean that we either were either a party to it, weren't "involved" but went along with it, or were too stupid to know they shouldnt have been able to do it. Any one of those 3 choices is an insult.

No Amir Khan? This division is the best around at the moment. ha ha ha damn. i should do a poll on which of the 10 i have up there be taken out to make room for amir.

No Amir Khan? This division is the best around at the moment.