The difference between the two organizations was highlighted last night after the Witter Vs Bradley fight.
If Witter was a WBO fighter and probably working for Wank Warren, Wank Warren would never have let his fighter fight the mandatory challenger, when did Joe the Slapper ever fight a No 1 challenger. But unlike the WBC the WBO is not a proper title and promoters can manipulate the sanctioning body into oking fights that are one sided.
Will Joe the Slapper fight Froch who is the No1 WBC fighter, I don’t think so, Joe will vacate the title rather than defend it.
WBC proved it is still the No 1 Title to have by making the champ fight the mandatory challenger, and Kudos for doing so.
suliaman IS don kings bitch.all of them should get banned as far as I'm concerened.i don't see the point in paying an org to call yourself champion of that org.fuckem all.
Don’t you know the WBC is corrupt too? :nonono:
Can anyone explain to me why they have Floyd holding that belt for 2 years and he HAVENOT DEFENDED IT TO A TRUE WW EVER SINCE HE GOT IT back in 2006? And he still holds it? WTF?
They let Floyd defend his title against a JR.WW not rank at WW.
They also allow DLH a title defense of his WBC light middleweight title against Floyd who had NEVER fought at that weightclass before!:tapedshut
good post wbc is the most legit boxing organization out there but they still have a lot of improving to do one thing i respect about the wbc is that there are no interim title holders which is great it gives more prestige to the title but like all boxing organizations money does play a part thats why they let mayweather hold the wbc belt without defending it
forget about the ring belt thats a subjective title that requires no defenses
wtf?? they do have interim champions.