I think its safe to say

last night is an example but im talking about fights going further back, ive just notice people claiming domination or clearly won but then i go and watch it and find nothing of the sort its mainly people are falling in love with active fighters regardless of how effective they are, i see plenty of people saying o he threw more punches blah blah blah a fighter can throw and land more punches but it doesnt mean he won im sorry to bust your bubble but its the truth

Whichever way you may have scored the match last night, if you know anything about boxing then Joe would have won. Calzaghe was taken out of his game, what stopped hopkins dominating him was age, which greatly reduced his punch output, hopkins won, face it son.

Whichever way you may have scored the match last night, if you know anything about boxing then Joe would have won.

I truly beilve now after B-hop/Calzaghe people have forgotten how to properly score a boxing match, they score now based on who fights the way they like and its sad truly sad How about you give some examples? I also hope, for your credibility if nothing else, that you are not even considering claiming that Calzaghe lost.....