That fool is old and washed up. Couldnt even KO an overrated Cotto. There would be no point in Floyd fighting him because Floyd would whoop on him a new one. He wouldnt even able to take DLH now.
Also, how are people saying Mosley should retire because he is washed up, when he is still fighting great, and he is atleast fighting anyone they put infront of him, unlike Mayweather who picks washed up guys who he's beat
That fool is old and washed up. Couldnt even KO an overrated Cotto. There would be no point in Floyd fighting him because Floyd would whoop on him a new one. He wouldnt even able to take DLH now.Mosley stood in good fighting a much younger and stronger Cotto and yes he has lost some of his attributes,a primed Mosley would ko Cotto and to sum it up Mosley still can beat over half of the top 10 welterweights.
Everytime you try and comment with these guys, all they do is make up senseless garbage, atleast if your going to argue, state some facts about the person you are talking about and not just opinions
Nope, I don't think thats right because it was Cotto who tired out early. If you actually watch that fight, you'll see Mosley really was putting pressure on Cotto near the end of the fight, Cotto has a slight edge because of his jab, but Mosley was answering back to almost every Cotto punch that's why they both landed exactly the same amount of landed punches. Mosley threw more which shows how quickly Cotto tired out. But he wasn't landing effective punches on Cotto which was a determining factor
He has great stamina but going toe-to-toe with Miguel helped Cotto sort of break him down. His punch output seemed to drop late in the fight. Cotto wouldn't have been able to outbox Shane early on. I think Shane got tired or was feeling those body punches from earlier.
Mosley's still the 3rd best welterweight. Cotto couldn't handle Floyd. Too much skill. Floyd can beat Cotto anywhere in the ring and can adapt to anything Cotto shows him. Floyd is much more accurate than Shane and his stamina will still be there in the later rounds.
I think your're overating Cotto a bit too much here. He is good but IMO isn't better then Floyd. You're comparing Floyd's 130 resume with Cotto's 147 which doesn't seem right. Mosley gave Cotto the fight of his life and IMO was sloppy against Mosley, and he was clearly tired out in the later rounds. The strategy that won Cotto the Mosley fight was his jab. Without it I would say Mosley would get the win from the judges. He was also cut in the same place Judah caught him from inside his mouth. If he were to fight Mayweather, he would have to fiind a better strategy
You gotta ask yourself who Oscar De La Hoya is. What has he accomplished? .
DLH got KO by B-hop and a then he was inactive for over 20 moths then he fought the human punching bag (Mayorga) and then took a year off before Floyd fought Him
How is he more of a threat than Cotto who could'nt even handle an old washed up Mosley? What significance would fighting Cotto have if Mayweather already won the fight?
So he won the fight without fighting it? U most think WWE is real too.
1. Mosley still is better than DLH, Cotto defeated Mosley and a prime DLH couldn't do it and he try twice!!!!
2. Floyd against DLH= Split Desicion for Floyd while Cotto/Mosley =Unanimous Desicion win for Cotto
3.Cotto is 8 years younger than DLH
4.Unlike DLH, Cotto is on his prime!
5. Nobody have defeated Cotto!!!
6.Cotto is actively fighting 3 time a year!!!
7.Cotto is southpaw with and orthodox stance and he switch it up between rounds!
8. Styles make fights and while Floyd might have the best elusive style, Cotto is good presure fighter that stalk you and cuts the ring.
9. Cotto have enough power on his hands to KO floyd (more Power than floyd if he decides to stop running and trade punches)
10.Floyd have speed but speed is not all in boxing cuz Judah have more speed that Floyd and still lost to floyd and better yet he got KO by Cotto!!!
11. Cotto does have a jab and can box too! (Mosley fight)
He can easily beat Cotto than the way he beat Hatton and thats no joke jack. So why would he beat Cotto for less money than beating Hatton?
Hatton is a joke jack he's an overated JR WELTER who can't fight at WELTER. Cotto those fight a Welterweight
in conclusion:
1.Your avatar is Gay
2.Corley, Sosa, and Judah went 12 round with floyd but Cotto KO Corley in just 5, Sosa in 4 and judah in the 11th
3.Floyd have a good resume at 130 but at 147 Cotto's resume is better!:owned:
That fool is old and washed up. Couldnt even KO an overrated Cotto. There would be no point in Floyd fighting him because Floyd would whoop on him a new one. He wouldnt even able to take DLH now.
He made that overrated Cotto bust a Mayweather in the last few rounds. Give him some credit.
If there's one fighter who is old and washed up is DLH. Don't get me wrong he was a good fighter but was is speaking about the past. He needs to retire because he's ruining a good legacy
That fool is old and washed up. Couldnt even KO an overrated Cotto. There would be no point in Floyd fighting him because Floyd would whoop on him a new one. He wouldnt even able to take DLH now.
Overrated Cotto? You fucking airhead nub. Your probably 10 yearsold.
Listen up doggie cuz it dont look like you know much about anything. You gotta ask yourself who Oscar De La Hoya is. What has he accomplished? Take what he has accomplished and his PPV #'s and you have your answer. Oscar De La Hoya is one of the best STILL doin it today doggie. How is he more of a threat than Cotto who could'nt even handle an old washed up Mosley? What significance would fighting Cotto have if Mayweather already won the fight? He can easily beat Cotto than the way he beat Hatton and thats no joke jack. So why would he beat Cotto for less money than beating Hatton? Some of you doggies kill me with this shit.
This post makes me laugh. Are you kidding me? You're saying Mayweather is facing DLH because DLH is good and accomplished a lot in his career? If it were that way then he wouldn't have nothing to prove after beating him the first time no, he would face opponents he's never faced before like Cotto? And who was the one who beat DLH twice? Mosley did, don't forget about that. Your making Mosley seem like he never accomplished nothing, he fought a great fight against Cotto and IMO the least they should've gave him was a tie. He was putting pressure on him and using Cotto's strategy by being the pressure fighter in the fight. First you say Mosley couldn't even beat Cotto then in another post you say Cotto's is shit because he couldn't handle Mosley. That just shows what bullshit your posts are. Get your opinions straight hommie. Mosley is still looking like a good opponent, and your overlooking that. Mayweather is just looking to face the opponents he allready beat because of money. Mosley is fighting younger fighters who he never faced before so how does it mean he's just doing it for the money. Get your shit together before you talk smack, and atleast make some sense of your posts
Listen up doggie cuz it dont look like you know much about anything. You gotta ask yourself who Oscar De La Hoya is. What has he accomplished? Take what he has accomplished and his PPV #'s and you have your answer. Oscar De La Hoya is one of the best STILL doin it today doggie. How is he more of a threat than Cotto who could'nt even handle an old washed up Mosley? What significance would fighting Cotto have if Mayweather already won the fight? He can easily beat Cotto than the way he beat Hatton and thats no joke jack. So why would he beat Cotto for less money than beating Hatton? Some of you doggies kill me with this shit.
You're right. But they don't see it. The doggies. lol
i understand u floyd = money thats why i dont care who he is fighting if aint his number 1 challenger or a good up and coming opponent, u see that big show shit dat he did i aint even had a glimpse at any clip, u can keep supporting him if u want but let me ask u this what are you getting out of it?