Calzaghe vs Hopkins = Calzaghe vs Eubank

Now, before anyone starts complaining about Eubank being 'nowhere near Hopkin's level', thats not really what this thread is about. I was thinking about it and I see some parallels between these two fights, particularly in how I think that they are going to play out. Both Hopkins and Eubank are skilled, wily and highly intelligent fighters. They both have chins so rock that I cant see Calzaghe finishing off Hopkins anymore than he did Eubank. Similarly, Eubank faced Calzaghe in the twilight of his career when his stock was fading, like Hopkins, however they both had enough left in their tank to be able to cause Calzaghe trouble. I see a similar result in both. Calzaghe being the harder worker, his youth, speed and work-rate being the deciding factor in a wide unanimous decision to Calzaghe, but not without the slick wily counter-puncher rocking Calzaghe from time to time and causing him a bit of trouble. With that said, I think that Calzaghe is by far a better fighter than he was against Eubank, so although I see him having to dig deep in this fight like he did in that, I dont see him being in as much trouble against Hopkins as he was against Eubank. I also tend to think that Eubank had a little more left in him than Hopkins does. I think that its fair to say that one way or the other, Hopkins knows that this is most likely his last fight.