And? Who the fuck agreed with the judges in the Casamayor/Santa Cruz fight??
Not many, but it was also scored much closer then this fight. 114-113 or reverse vs 98/97-92/93.
i had campbell winning on points, casa started out good and faded, then got into his clinching and pulled out some veteran tricks and eeked out a decision.
Not arguing your recollection, but the judges didn't seem to agree with you.
Casamayor wants the Diaz/Pac winner...but Campbell jumped in the ring (off camera) and is demanding his rematch lol
Was the first fight's decision controversial? I don't remember seeing the fight, but I remember Campbell giving a "WTF?" reaction to the scores
i had campbell winning on points, casa started out good and faded, then got into his clinching and pulled out some veteran tricks and eeked out a decision.
From Boxrec:
2003-01-25 133 Nate Campbell 131 23-0-0
Pechanga Entertainment Center, Temecula, California, United States W UD 10 10 Wiki
~ referee: Pat Russell | judge: Robert Mendoza 98-92 | judge: Jerry Cantu 97-93 | judge: Chuck Hassett 96-94 ~
i think they should fight again, but from the post fight interview, Casamayor doesn't want to fight Campbell.
he wants bigger paydays, but i don't think anyone wants to give him a big payday, i mean, which one of those guys casa was calling would want to fight him???
Who did he call out?
i think they should fight again, but from the post fight interview, Casamayor doesn't want to fight Campbell.
he wants bigger paydays, but i don't think anyone wants to give him a big payday, i mean, which one of those guys casa was calling would want to fight him???