wlad klitschko vs. primo carnera.... lol... how old is this sonofabitch?
wlad would literally kill him
Then why did he run every time Ibragimov twitched his ass?
I think the difference with those 2 Tyson fights is Tyson was trying to engage them & KO them. Wlad was content to jab & occasionally throw the right hand in for a decision victory. Tucker & Smith were trying the fight survive & not get KO'ed.
Good point, I agree.
Bonecrusher was fighting scared, he just wanted to go the full 12. Good pick.
I think the difference with those 2 Tyson fights is Tyson was trying to engage them & KO them. Wlad was content to jab & occasionally throw the right hand in for a decision victory. Tucker & Smith were trying the fight survive & not get KO'ed.
I'll be glad when this old goat is part of the past that he is stuck living in. Saying Primo Carnera was better than Klitschko shows what an old buffoon he really is. Worst fight he has ever seen? I don't go back as far as he does, and I'm not sure it would even make my top 10. I mean, was it really worse than Byrd-Williamson just a few years ago?
for real, bert is VERY biased.
Who gives a flying fuck what that old cocksucker thinks...Bert Sugar is an opinionated cunt and he is prejudiced against European fighters...How old is that cocksucker anyway?? He should be dead by now.
When anyone says something negative about Klitschko...why do you believe racism is the cause?
Maybe,just maybe...someone can have a different opinion,not based on race.
But....let me not try to be rational with you,I don't want to interrupt your man-love with sanity.
He still ain't gonna marry you...
http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=3949
I think he's a bit harsh but makes some valid points.
man, this is classic, funny too!
spot on ..
I really didn't find that one as boring, Tyson was forcing the fight, Tucker actually gave him problems the first few rounds and he threw more than 28 punches per round.
holyfield/lewis 1 was pretty bad
I already posted this in another thread, so I'll just paste it here. I was referring to the beautiful article written by Anal Sensation and to him personally:
Mike Tyson, 1st unification fight, with James Smith in 1987 - win by UD
Mike Tyson, 2nd unification fight, with Tony Tucker in 1987 - win by UD
Lewis, 1st unification fight with Holyfield in 1999 - a draw
Lewis, 2nd unification fight with Holyfield in 1999 - win by UD
What the fuck is wrong with THIS win by UD? I'm not a huge Wlad fan but come on, hasn't it crossed your mind that when 2 skilled champions meet in the ring, the KO is not that usual because that's no bum like Austin in front of either of the fighter?
whichever fight really doesn't matter. i think a huge point is that people are always a little miffed if a guy known for crushing opponents goes 12 rounds with what people would consider a lesser fighter. and the thompson/tyson fight was a unification that i found a bit boring. wladimir, though, did technically play a perfect game. tyson did pull out a rare decision in that fight. both of these fights will and should be overlooked a bit considering both are highly destructive fighters.
check out my thread to gain some incite into how manny and wladimir veiw this last fight. i also threw in some nice klitschko KOs to remind people, and teach all these newer idiots that just joined i the last month or two, that wladimir is known to put people away.
try mike tyson vs tony tucker.
same story as klitschko vs sulty.
I really didn't find that one as boring, Tyson was forcing the fight, Tucker actually gave him problems the first few rounds and he threw more than 28 punches per round.