Hatton vs Williams

Now that Williams proved he is not invincible anyone change their mind? I'm sticking with Williams.

Hatton is a bad matchup for him since he would get insideon him..

So what were all these Williams supporters now. LOL like I said Hatton would make Williams quit. TKO in 8th round or sooner.

Now that Williams proved he is not invincible anyone change their mind? No :) I still say Hatton beats him, haha.

Now that Williams proved he is not invincible anyone change their mind?

Yeah right...Remember Micheal Brodie???? for the WBC .. Yeah it was a farce but what is the relevance of it to the Hatton Collazo fight.

If someone asked me what one of the worst matchups would be in boxing, Id say Williams vs Hatton it would be such an odd pairing because as you said they are complete opposites Hatton would have all the disadvantages. Then I started to think maybe Hattons small size and quickness may work in his favor. Thats why I was wondering what everyone else thought. But I really dont think Hatton should fight at 147 again. I would never put Hatton in at 147 against Pure boxers or Southpaws, Baldomir at 147 Yes..Gatti at 147..Yes,Berto at 147 yes/Maybe but southpaw NO way.

No. If I thought Collazo won I would say so. Yeah right...Remember Micheal Brodie???? for the WBC ..

Nobody is suggesting a fighter with long arms cant lose but when you pit Williams and Hatton together you're talking about too many major disadvantages for Hatton, Anyone as small as Hatton has a very very slim chance including the short Berto. We all know how hatton did in 2 fights at 147, So when we have a fighter who has even more advantages to add to that like williams theni would repeat it NO CHANCE. If someone asked me what one of the worst matchups would be in boxing, Id say Williams vs Hatton it would be such an odd pairing because as you said they are complete opposites Hatton would have all the disadvantages. Then I started to think maybe Hattons small size and quickness may work in his favor. Thats why I was wondering what everyone else thought. But I really dont think Hatton should fight at 147 again.

Yep...He got an hometown decision because he is the House fighter NOT collazo....Imagine if the fight was in Manchester and Collazo was the challenger like Hatton was, You lot would have been screaming blue moon murder if they give Collazo the decision. No. If I thought Collazo won I would say so.

So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question. If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed.That's true, but the reason I picked Williams to beat Ricky is, even though Williams has long arms, he is still very good on the inside, I don't think he would let Ricky capitalize like you say he would. Also, just the plain fact that he is naturally much bigger than Ricky, and obviously Ricky had a lot of disadvantages in WW as it was shown with Collazo and PBF.

So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question. If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed. Nobody is suggesting a fighter with long arms cant lose but when you pit Williams and Hatton together you're talking about too many major disadvantages for Hatton, Anyone as small as Hatton has a very very slim chance including the short Berto. We all know how hatton did in 2 fights at 147, So when we have a fighter who has even more advantages to add to that like williams theni would repeat it NO CHANCE.

LOL, yeah PAUL WILLIAMS..the man with the same reach as Wlad klistchko??? some of this hatton fans really can deal with reality. So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question. If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed.

Ah, right. That will be the gift decision Hatton got against an American fighter in America. Good one. Yep...He got an hometown decision because he is the House fighter NOT collazo....Imagine if the fight was in Manchester and Collazo was the challenger like Hatton was, You lot would have been screaming blue moon murder if they give Collazo the decision.

Williams easily.

Yes they did, Its called HBO fighter, Like the gift they gave him against Collazo. Ah, right. That will be the gift decision Hatton got against an American fighter in America. Good one.

The judges must have been wearing those glasses as well because that's exactly how they scored it. Yes they did, Its called HBO fighter, Like the gift they gave him against Collazo.

Williams as in Paul Williams right?? Hatton wouldnt have a prayer. LOL, yeah PAUL WILLIAMS..the man with the same reach as Wlad klistchko??? some of this hatton fans really can deal with reality.

So he blew out Urango like he did Castillo??? a fucking prospect at 17-0?? He couldnt take a bodyshot that urango threw, He hug and cling his way to victory..yeah thats a really 11 rounds win..:ugh: Masterclass Boxing Hatton/Urango.........LOL.....Hatton won 11 rounds....LOL, you must have borrowed steve wonders glasses that night. The judges must have been wearing those glasses as well because that's exactly how they scored it.

Williams as in Paul Williams right?? Hatton wouldnt have a prayer.