When comparing Mayweather to Cotto.

WHAT? LMAO.......LOL, i guess so. your right man :cop: according to you, he had to fight the best to be the best. im assuming you think cotto,williams,margarito are the best. has floyd fought any of these guys? no but he's still regarded as being the best. you must be the 12 year old or you would know that. i want the man the continue to fight also but to knock him for taking a break is silly. the cotto fight could have been made before but arum wasnt ready to put him in the ring with mayweather. now he wants cotto to fight mayweather now that he's taking a break. let the man rest, he had a busy year

lol, what are you 12? you have to fight the best to be the best ..:cop: evidently not asshole.. floyd is the best. where on planet earth have u been hiding? who are you to say that he isnt. your opinion means nothing.

LOL..WEAK.....:cop: weak just like yourself. floyd is still the best on the planet, get over it loser

Where did you go? in my eyes and in most he lost the rematch. you pay attention

Shane Mosley is a WW you donkey. :duh: dumb ass! the question was, dont you think there are welters out there better than floyds recent comp?

I have faith that Mayweather-Cotto will happen at some point, I'm guessing late 2008, early 2009. And when it does all the haters will have their excuses ready when Floyd takes Cotto to school in a lopsided fight.

Never? DOn't you think the WW's that are out there are probably a little better than the comp Mayweather faced? HELL NO!! oscar alone can clean out the division

Cotto's resume will never be as impressive as Floyd's. He will have a loss to Floyd by the time it is completed as well. can't wait to take at least 200,000 points away from u sweety.:kiss:

Hear that Miguel? Never. Yeah. Cotto shouldn't even be allowed to fight. Just give him an L already, right? Mayweather doesn't need to fight anymore, right? He's beaten everyone. Greatest of all-time. PBF. Money May. Bla Blah Blah.... First of all, who gives a shit about an 0? I know: The same guys who say he doesn't have to fight this guy, he doesn't have to that guy... he's the best. Well, if he's the fucking best... then get in the ring and show it. Show it until you can't show it no more. You got that Calzaghe and Mayweather fans... stop saying he doesn't have to show it. What are you protecting the 0 for? It's so overrated. You'll feel much better about it when you let it go. You'll be able to enjoy their careers more and open real possibilities for greatness instead of the appearance of greatness. Never? DOn't you think the WW's that are out there are probably a little better than the comp Mayweather faced?

Hear that Miguel? Never. Yeah. Cotto shouldn't even be allowed to fight. Just give him an L already, right? Mayweather doesn't need to fight anymore, right? He's beaten everyone. Greatest of all-time. PBF. Money May. Bla Blah Blah.... First of all, who gives a shit about an 0? I know: The same guys who say he doesn't have to fight this guy, he doesn't have to that guy... he's the best. Well, if he's the fucking best... then get in the ring and show it. Show it until you can't show it no more. You got that Calzaghe and Mayweather fans... stop saying he doesn't have to show it. What are you protecting the 0 for? It's so overrated. You'll feel much better about it when you let it go. You'll be able to enjoy their careers more and open real possibilities for greatness instead of the appearance of greatness. Whoa slow down there tiger. Personally I feel Cotto will have a DAMN impressive resume and is on the fast track to the HOF when all is said and done. That being said I don't think Cotto has the opponents around his particular weight class to propel his resume past Floyd's. He hasn't even beaten a lineal champion yet. You must be talking to other fans because I for one believe Floyd should definitely face Cotto to prove doubters wrong. It will happen and his greatness will be furthered. Hell, if Cotto fairs well in the bout he may become an even bigger star because of it.

Cotto's resume will never be as impressive as Floyd's. He will have a loss to Floyd by the time it is completed as well. Hear that Miguel? Never. Yeah. Cotto shouldn't even be allowed to fight. Just give him an L already, right? Mayweather doesn't need to fight anymore, right? He's beaten everyone. Greatest of all-time. PBF. Money May. Bla Blah Blah.... First of all, who gives a shit about an 0? I know: The same guys who say he doesn't have to fight this guy, he doesn't have to that guy... he's the best. Well, if he's the fucking best... then get in the ring and show it. Show it until you can't show it no more. You got that Calzaghe and Mayweather fans... stop saying he doesn't have to show it. What are you protecting the 0 for? It's so overrated. You'll feel much better about it when you let it go. You'll be able to enjoy their careers more and open real possibilities for greatness instead of the appearance of greatness.

Cotto's resume will never be as impressive as Floyd's. He will have a loss to Floyd by the time it is completed as well.

fool, you better go check the resume. Who has Cotto beat better at WW? He beat Mosley and thats it but in that same time Floyd has beat Oscar at 154, a Hatton that still beat a good Collazo which is much better then anyone Quintana has ever beat, a Baldomire who hadnt loss in a million years, and he beat a easily better version of Zab then Cotto. Cotto beat Zab when he hadnt won a fight in over 2 years and was just coming off of a year long suspension. Now, you also better check the resume when you talk about the age. Floyd is way ahead of the game when it comes to age. Floyd is like the guys in the 80's. Cotto, Williams, and all these other guys didnt start fighting top guys until late in there career. Floyd was fighting a undefeated killer in Chico when he was just 23 and had a ton of big fights around that time. All that was done way younger then when Cotto started having tough fights. People make Williams sound like this young guy who is fighting everyone. Dude was 26 when he started doing stuff. Floyd was 23 and having top fights back to back Beating the lineal WW champion of the world, and the former undisputed champion of the world in back to back fights, that in itself is more than anything Cotto has done at WW. And that's not even including Mayweather's destruction of Ricky Hatton, and beating De La Hoya at 154, while fighting in the ring weighing 148. A win over Baldomir is meaningless. The man was a lineal mistake. Lineal only means he upset Zab Judah, nothing more and nothing less; a tune-up gone wrong. The fact that anyone even attempt to claim Baldomir was a great achievement at WW is laughable. Miguel Cotto fought an undefeated Quintana, and 3 current top 10 rated welterweights. 3 guys that are still top 10 rated after being beaten, unlike Baldobum.

At junior lightweight, he was spectacular, cleaning out the division in dominate fashion. At lightweight, he wasn't as dominate, but at least he did take on the best possible opponent(Jose Luis Castillo). From 140 147 and 154lbs he's been too selective about who he fights. People want to say he has wins over Oscar and Hatton, but Oscar has never been the same fighter he once was since the lost to Tito and Hatton never belonged at 147lbs. Now when Cotto beat the hell out of Zab (and Zab never has had his ass kicked like that before) people say Cotto did not fight the same Zab PbF did. I wonder what people will say if Cotto fights Oscar and knocks him out, beats him up like he did Zab. Are people going to say that PBF fought a better Oscar than Cotto did. Cotto will face better challenges at WW than PBF did, but for some reason people love this guy and want to call him the "GREATEST OF ALL TIME" Not too long ago they said the same thing about RJJ until Tarver whipped that ass and showed the world that even "SUPERMAN" can be beat.

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/8910/200pxrealisticdildo01mk0.jpg Viva Mexico's bed buddy plain and basic common sense. I read that in the dome man and that shit had me crying laughing. Good one:lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

PLAIN and BASIC COMMON SENSE. http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/8981/9318gd2.jpg

fool, you better go check the resume. Who has Cotto beat better at WW? He beat Mosley and thats it but in that same time Floyd has beat Oscar at 154, a Hatton that still beat a good Collazo which is much better then anyone Quintana has ever beat, a Baldomire who hadnt loss in a million years, and he beat a easily better version of Zab then Cotto. Cotto beat Zab when he hadnt won a fight in over 2 years and was just coming off of a year long suspension. Now, you also better check the resume when you talk about the age. Floyd is way ahead of the game when it comes to age. Floyd is like the guys in the 80's. Cotto, Williams, and all these other guys didnt start fighting top guys until late in there career. Floyd was fighting a undefeated killer in Chico when he was just 23 and had a ton of big fights around that time. All that was done way younger then when Cotto started having tough fights. People make Williams sound like this young guy who is fighting everyone. Dude was 26 when he started doing stuff. Floyd was 23 and having top fights back to back Damn, Homie you killed the thread:dead: Good post!

Who are you calling fool, idiot. If you are so confident Floyd has faced better opposition at welter why do you have to talk about Oscar at 154, his career at lightweight, and his fight against chico. The truth is that Hatton was gifted his win over Collazo, Baldomir is shit, and Cotto disposed of Judah quicker than Floyd and there is only ONE Zab Judah. Cotto has, in fact, done more at welter than Floyd so don't try to weasel your bullshit onto this board calling other people fools. It is you that has been fooled. Beating the lineal WW champion of the world, and the former undisputed champion of the world in back to back fights, that in itself is more than anything Cotto has done at WW. And that's not even including Mayweather's destruction of Ricky Hatton, and beating De La Hoya at 154, while fighting in the ring weighing 148.

fool, you better go check the resume. Who has Cotto beat better at WW? He beat Mosley and thats it but in that same time Floyd has beat Oscar at 154, a Hatton that still beat a good Collazo which is much better then anyone Quintana has ever beat, a Baldomire who hadnt loss in a million years, and he beat a easily better version of Zab then Cotto. Cotto beat Zab when he hadnt won a fight in over 2 years and was just coming off of a year long suspension. Now, you also better check the resume when you talk about the age. Floyd is way ahead of the game when it comes to age. Floyd is like the guys in the 80's. Cotto, Williams, and all these other guys didnt start fighting top guys until late in there career. Floyd was fighting a undefeated killer in Chico when he was just 23 and had a ton of big fights around that time. All that was done way younger then when Cotto started having tough fights. People make Williams sound like this young guy who is fighting everyone. Dude was 26 when he started doing stuff. Floyd was 23 and having top fights back to back Who are you calling fool, idiot. If you are so confident Floyd has faced better opposition at welter why do you have to talk about Oscar at 154, his career at lightweight, and his fight against chico. The truth is that Hatton was gifted his win over Collazo, Baldomir is shit, and Cotto disposed of Judah quicker than Floyd and there is only ONE Zab Judah. Cotto has, in fact, done more at welter than Floyd so don't try to weasel your bullshit onto this board calling other people fools. It is you that has been fooled.

You have to put in account that Mayweather started his career much earlier then Cotto, which is about 5-6 years. Take that into consideration when you talk about how many more champs Mayweather has fought then Cotto.. He's been in the game longer :duh: Now when you compare them in the welter division which they have both been in for 2 years, who has the better welter record? Give the boy 5 years though and I guarantee he will have a resume just as impressive.. if not, better. fool, you better go check the resume. Who has Cotto beat better at WW? He beat Mosley and thats it but in that same time Floyd has beat Oscar at 154, a Hatton that still beat a good Collazo which is much better then anyone Quintana has ever beat, a Baldomire who hadnt loss in a million years, and he beat a easily better version of Zab then Cotto. Cotto beat Zab when he hadnt won a fight in over 2 years and was just coming off of a year long suspension. Now, you also better check the resume when you talk about the age. Floyd is way ahead of the game when it comes to age. Floyd is like the guys in the 80's. Cotto, Williams, and all these other guys didnt start fighting top guys until late in there career. Floyd was fighting a undefeated killer in Chico when he was just 23 and had a ton of big fights around that time. All that was done way younger then when Cotto started having tough fights. People make Williams sound like this young guy who is fighting everyone. Dude was 26 when he started doing stuff. Floyd was 23 and having top fights back to back