Morales is probably a slightly more complete fighter but Tito is the better fighter. People need to remember Tito lost at Middleweight not welter or jrMW.
They both have a who's who list in there resume's because both fought the very best in there weight classes. Tito's might be higher valued to some due to the higher popularity of the Welterweight division but they are about equal. There isn't a person at Welterweight that was around that Tito didn't fight....except for Ike who dissappeared after he felt (not saying he was just his feelings) he was robbed by DLH.
I doubt it.
Tito had much more in the power department and Erik was a much better boxer, but loved to brawl. Morales was a much more accurate puncher than Tito.
I don't know about this one. Trinidad was a very accurate puncher. His footwork was ass so he lost his accuracy against guys like Hopkins and DLH, but he was usually accurate and picked his punches well.
I doubt it.
Tito had much more in the power department and Erik was a much better boxer, but loved to brawl. Morales was a much more accurate puncher than Tito.
i think that one of the characteristics that makes one a superior "boxer" is control and Erik lacked that many times. He may have had the ABILITY but Tito showed more focus in his career.
Morales could box, but was so prone to brawling.
Trinidad's skills have become underrated over time I might add, probably on his own doing as he fell in love with his power.
The only edge I would give Tito would be in the "boxing" category. Errything else is Morales.
I doubt it.
Tito had much more in the power department and Erik was a much better boxer, but loved to brawl. Morales was a much more accurate puncher than Tito.
Morales was more of a complete boxer. But Tito fought better opponents by far. Tito fought guys that were undefeated..like Oba Carr and Campas..Oba had like 40 wins and 0 losses and Campas was like 50 wins and 0 losses. Not to mention the bigger names he fought which were all undefeated at the time Ried, Vargas, DLH. Morales was a technician and had excellent foot work and very good speed and power in his prime. Tito was as technically sound as Morales but he had great stamina and power.
Who was more complete boxer?
Morales
Who has best wins?
Trinidad!! Destructions of Vargas, Joppy, Blocker...those were awesome wins!
ring.
I dont think this wis be better than:
MANY PACQUIAO Super champ
CARLOS FAMOSITO HERNANDEZ The real warrior
JUNIOR POISON JONES He beat twice Barrera
,MARCO A BARRERA A Legend... 3 wars
KEVIN KELLEY Big champion and possible HOF
IN JIN CHI 6 years like champion in featherweight WBC
PAUL AYALA 2 times Champion
GUTY ESPADAS JR Ex world champion
JESUS CHAVEZ 2 times champion in 2 divisions
Who was more complete boxer?
Morales
Who has best wins?
Trinidad!! Destructions of Vargas, Joppy, Blocker...those were awesome wins!
Who has better opponents?
toss up here, quality of competition probably both get an 8 on a scale of 10.
Who has more better fights?
Morales in my estimation, vs Barrera WOW, I liked his fight vs Zaragoza too, awesome stuff from a youngster, and his first fight with Pacquiao...not that it was a big difference either way both of these guys did great stuff in the ring.
Id go with Morales for the simple fact i dont see him ever getting beat the way Tito did against Winky, he made a former world champion look like he had never stepped foot in a boxing ring before.
Who was more complete boxer?
Who has best wins?
Who has better opponents?
Who has more better fights?
Tough choices, except that Morales definitely had the better fights.
Who was more complete boxer?
Who has best wins?
Who has better opponents?
Who has more better fights?
erik morales is way better of course, but tito is the KO artist here,