The fight starts out with oscar rushing floyd, landing some good shots and taking the round comfortably. floyd chooses to fight on the outside after tasting delahoyas power. in the 2nd rd floyd tried to get the jab going but everytime he threw it the ref leaped in and made em both back up. this went on until about rd 7 when floyd got frustrated at the unfair treatment from the ref, and starts going after oscar. as he pins oscar on the ropes he walks into one of his legendary left shots, and goes down, he beats the count but is stopped soon afterwards due to a barrage of powershots.
a perfectly justifiable win for oscar as the ref only stopped floyd fighting his fight
:p :p :p
btw, i know jabbing is legal, but its also open to the referees interpretation.....
.....or pay packet as us average joes call it.
Summary
Surely a rule should either be enforced by all or allowed by all.
is the offside rule in football open to interpretation beyond what officials can see ?
can you go out on a single instead of a double in darts if the umpire says u can ?
can mma'ers gouge an opponents eye if the ref lets it happen ?
come on guys, seriously.
i except the hatton loss (yes this thread was about pbf vs hatton) but something needs to be done, both KT and Hatton got away with worse in their fight.
his point is that the ref should not have judged the Castillo fight and the Mayweather fight differently because he allowed Hatton to do his thing in the Castillo or KT fight but not in the Mayweather fight.
Hatton lost face it, I wanted him to win but Mayweather just beat him, the reffing was dodgy but Hatton got KO'd it doesn't matter now.Well yeah, i did say the same
but as a brit, im obviously dissapointed with the ref.......:gives:
i'm sorry, what exactly is your point again? i mean, you do have a point don't you?
his point is that the ref should not have judged the Castillo fight and the Mayweather fight differently because he allowed Hatton to do his thing in the Castillo or KT fight but not in the Mayweather fight.
Hatton lost face it, I wanted him to win but Mayweather just beat him, the reffing was dodgy but Hatton got KO'd it doesn't matter now.
The fight starts out with oscar rushing floyd, landing some good shots and taking the round comfortably. floyd chooses to fight on the outside after tasting delahoyas power. in the 2nd rd floyd tried to get the jab going but everytime he threw it the ref leaped in and made em both back up. this went on until about rd 7 when floyd got frustrated at the unfair treatment from the ref, and starts going after oscar. as he pins oscar on the ropes he walks into one of his legendary left shots, and goes down, he beats the count but is stopped soon afterwards due to a barrage of powershots.
a perfectly justifiable win for oscar as the ref only stopped floyd fighting his fight
:p :p :p
btw, i know jabbing is legal, but its also open to the referees interpretation.....
.....or pay packet as us average joes call it.
Summary
Surely a rule should either be enforced by all or allowed by all.
is the offside rule in football open to interpretation beyond what officials can see ?
can you go out on a single instead of a double in darts if the umpire says u can ?
can mma'ers gouge an opponents eye if the ref lets it happen ?
come on guys, seriously.
i except the hatton loss (yes this thread was about pbf vs hatton) but something needs to be done, both KT and Hatton got away with worse in their fight.
i'm sorry, what exactly is your point again? i mean, you do have a point don't you?
18y ago
Delahoya vs Mayweather, another outcome. | BoxingScene Community