Harold Lederman's card was waaay off. Shows you how much his judging counts in fights and how good he is. I thought his numbers looked off he had somethin like 86-84? I knew that couldn't be right and the judges had like 88-81.
i think it was castillo winin by 1 point
ps: did u lose 250 points on hatton too lol? i betted more out of hope then brains lol
actually i remeber now i did haha i did it the first day i registered on hope i guess so i am a dumbass, i didn't remeber it and i have no idea what vcash does it seems that people bet points more than that so i was confused im still not sure how to bet points
Yeah I made many comments on Lederman's biased scoring throughout the fight.
I think he might have a personal grudge with Floyd, he scored the Chavez, Castillo I, Hatton and even some of the DLH rounds either really biased or really poorly.
Actually I could have seen why the judges gave it 115-111 if they had Mayweather sweeping the first 5 rounds, which I think he could have, but felt Castillo barely edged out the 5th. The 4th was close too.
115-111 for Castillo. I mean he gave rounds 3 and 10 to Castillo. Mayweather was winning most of the round in 3 and Castillo does a mini flurry that barely lands and he wins the round? Then in round 10 he gives it to Castillo when for most of the round Mayweather was landing huge punches that were landing on Castillo.
I don't want to go into the who won, but giving those 2 rounds to Mayweather would have atleast made it a draw. And he could have scored round 5 for Castillo and then have it 114-112 for Castillo if anything.
I had it 114-112 for Mayweather with him winning the first 4 rounds, losing 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12. Close fight though.
yeah it was a close fight i had it 114-112 for castillo but i can see it going either way, so im not one of those who says that floyd absolutly lost the fight, but i thought the margins by the judges were off, it was a really close fight, but i get why people hate on lederman he has some wack cards
i think it was castillo winin by 1 point
ps: did u lose 250 points on hatton too lol? i betted more out of hope then brains lol
oh yeah i had the castillo fight close too but i've seen lederman have some shitty cards, his voice cracks me up though, and if you were asking me no man im relativly new here i don't know how to bet, if i did i would have been a dumbass on hope and went for hatton too, mayweather really earned my respect tonight
what was his scorecard for mayweather castillo 1?
115-111 for Castillo. I mean he gave rounds 3 and 10 to Castillo. Mayweather was winning most of the round in 3 and Castillo does a mini flurry that barely lands and he wins the round? Then in round 10 he gives it to Castillo when for most of the round Mayweather was landing huge punches that were landing on Castillo.
I don't want to go into the who won, but giving those 2 rounds to Mayweather would have atleast made it a draw. And he could have scored round 5 for Castillo and then have it 114-112 for Castillo if anything.
I had it 114-112 for Mayweather with him winning the first 4 rounds, losing 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12. Close fight though.
what was his scorecard for mayweather castillo 1?
i think it was castillo winin by 1 point
ps: did u lose 250 points on hatton too lol? i betted more out of hope then brains lol
His first round's score was ridiculous.
Reminded me a bit of the Mayweather-Chavez round 1 score he gave.
Does anyone remember the punchstats they gave for round 1? Everyone in the room with me picked the best times to start talking really loudly about insignificant shit.
Rofl the punchstats in the first round were 13-6 for Mayweather.
Harold Lederman's card was waaay off. Shows you how much his judging counts in fights and how good he is. I thought his numbers looked off he had somethin like 86-84? I knew that couldn't be right and the judges had like 88-81.
Seriously...:welcome:
Lederman sucks donkey dick and most boxing fans know...
Harold Lederman's card was waaay off. Shows you how much his judging counts in fights and how good he is. I thought his numbers looked off he had somethin like 86-84? I knew that couldn't be right and the judges had like 88-81.
If that was Lederman's card then it was far more accurate than the braille readers who scored the fight.
His first round's score was ridiculous.
Reminded me a bit of the Mayweather-Chavez round 1 score he gave.
Does anyone remember the punchstats they gave for round 1? Everyone in the room with me picked the best times to start talking really loudly about insignificant shit.