Mayweather Replaces Robinson as Greatest Ever!

Not me, anybody with Roberto Duran in their avatar had to be joking.:)Astute observation. :D

dude.. that scared shit outa me.. Not me, anybody with Roberto Duran in their avatar had to be joking.:)

if he beat forrest and williams hes the greatest for me...but i dont think it gonna happen...

This is one of my older posts. There is no such a thing as the greatest of all time, because every era had some great fighters. It's dumb to consider any boxer as the greatest of all-time. Each era is different, we don't know how great Sugar Ray Robinson would've been in today's era or how great Floyd Mayweather Jr. would've been in Robinson's era or Jack Dempsey fighting today in the so called shitty heavyweight era, would Jack Dempsey still been an all time great fighting in the era of the super heavyweights, (Dempsey was only 175 to 180 in his prime) etc etc.... Skills is different, you can judge skills with your own eyes, but still you can't just consider guys like Whitaker, Mayweather Jr., Roid Jones, Sugar Ray Leonard & James Toney the greatest of all time, because none of these guys fought the other era greats. We just don't know how these greats would've been fighting in diffwerent era, all great boxers from each era should be considered an all time great but not the greatest of all time. Mohammad Ali was not the greatest of all time, Sugar ray Robinson was not greatest of all time, Henry Armstrong was not the greatest of all time, Sugar Ray Leoanrd was not the greatest of all time, Willie Pep was not the greatest of all time, Roberto Duran was not greatest of all time, Rocky Marciano was not the greatest of all time, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is not the greatest of all time etc... I've seen too many great boxers and I can't pick just one guy as the greatest of all time, maybe 10 or 20 but not 1. teddy atlas just said same thing on espnnew i agree with ya both

This is one of my older posts. There is no such a thing as the greatest of all time, because every era had some great fighters. It's dumb to consider any boxer as the greatest of all-time. Each era is different, we don't know how great Sugar Ray Robinson would've been in today's era or how great Floyd Mayweather Jr. would've been in Robinson's era or Jack Dempsey fighting today in the so called shitty heavyweight era, would Jack Dempsey still been an all time great fighting in the era of the super heavyweights, (Dempsey was only 175 to 180 in his prime) etc etc.... Skills is different, you can judge skills with your own eyes, but still you can't just consider guys like Whitaker, Mayweather Jr., Roid Jones, Sugar Ray Leonard & James Toney the greatest of all time, because none of these guys fought the other era greats. We just don't know how these greats would've been fighting in diffwerent era, all great boxers from each era should be considered an all time great but not the greatest of all time. Mohammad Ali was not the greatest of all time, Sugar ray Robinson was not greatest of all time, Henry Armstrong was not the greatest of all time, Sugar Ray Leoanrd was not the greatest of all time, Willie Pep was not the greatest of all time, Roberto Duran was not greatest of all time, Rocky Marciano was not the greatest of all time, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is not the greatest of all time etc... I've seen too many great boxers and I can't pick just one guy as the greatest of all time, maybe 10 or 20 but not 1. teddy atlas just said same thing on espnnew i agree with ya both

He is a great, I will give him that, actually I won't until he retires.

U scared me I thought u meant that.You may shove your heart back in it's socket now...;)

If Mayweather stepped in the ring with Robinson, then I'd put my money on Mayweather beating him. shit same here

This is one of my older posts. There is no such a thing as the greatest of all time, because every era had some great fighters. It's dumb to consider any boxer as the greatest of all-time. Each era is different, we don't know how great Sugar Ray Robinson would've been in today's era or how great Floyd Mayweather Jr. would've been in Robinson's era or Jack Dempsey fighting today in the so called shitty heavyweight era, would Jack Dempsey still been an all time great fighting in the era of the super heavyweights, (Dempsey was only 175 to 180 in his prime) etc etc.... Skills is different, you can judge skills with your own eyes, but still you can't just consider guys like Whitaker, Mayweather Jr., Roid Jones, Sugar Ray Leonard & James Toney the greatest of all time, because none of these guys fought the other era greats. We just don't know how these greats would've been fighting in diffwerent era, all great boxers from each era should be considered an all time great but not the greatest of all time. Mohammad Ali was not the greatest of all time, Sugar ray Robinson was not greatest of all time, Henry Armstrong was not the greatest of all time, Sugar Ray Leoanrd was not the greatest of all time, Willie Pep was not the greatest of all time, Roberto Duran was not greatest of all time, Rocky Marciano was not the greatest of all time, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is not the greatest of all time etc... I've seen too many great boxers and I can't pick just one guy as the greatest of all time, maybe 10 or 20 but not 1.very good post babe. :kiss: that's why i love your sexy ass. *no hyperion*

Got your attention, didn't I, lol. Not quite (not even close, really), but you have to him kudos for destroying his most formidable challenge to date. :hail: dude.. that scared shit outa me..

mad props to pbf. he is now in the top 20 of all time for me. he proved alot to me tonight! he fought very well!

Got your attention, didn't I, lol. Not quite (not even close, really), but you have to him kudos for destroying his most formidable challenge to date. :hail: U scared me I thought u meant that.