okay, we all know how quitali ran from hasim like rodney from the l.a.p.d. but why?
why did the wbc have to force quitali to fight rahman? why was quitali so reluctant to fight mandatory rahman and wanted so badly to face the boxing banker, calvin brock?
so you have no explanation as to why, as shown above, quitali wanted to fight brock and had to be forced by the wbc to fight mandatory rahman?
nobody?
bueller, bueller, bueller?
I'm not exactly a Vitali fan but I was under the belief that he would've been the best unified HW Champion in this current era anyway, & the only guy I've seen actually to have Lennox look like he was about to get KO'd since, since bullsh*t Rahman (did it by luck). Even still, u gotta admit that with all these retirements & then comebacks, fight dates, then cancellations due to...."injuries", Vitali is steady losing stripes with everytime he says he's ready then shows nothing for it. Can ya'll Dig Dat?!?!:boxing:
You seriously need to seek help, your hatred for Vitali Klitschko is very disturbing.
:bryce: :tool: :sucks: :fing26:
so you have no explanation as to why, as shown above, quitali wanted to fight brock and had to be forced by the wbc to fight mandatory rahman?
no explanation as to why, brittley fans?
You seriously need to seek help, your hatred for Vitali Klitschko is very disturbing.
:bryce: :tool: :sucks: :fing26:
http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-article.php?article=2373
Boxing News: WBC KOs Klitschko-Brock
The WBC stepped up to the plate and put the kibosh on the bout between Vitali Klitschko and Calvin Brock in September. Bowing to public pressure and the haranguing of the press, the WBC’s Board of Governors just released a statement announcing the news.
The Board of Governors of the World Boxing Council, presided by doctor Jose Sulaiman, announces from its offices in Mexico City that a final decision has been taken in regards to the heavyweight division, as follows:
1. The WBC requires that Vitali Klitschko make his following defense against the interim champion, winner of the Rahman-Barrett fight of August 13, 2005 in Chicago to comply with the WBC Rules and Regulations for a champion.
2. Vitali Klitschko would be approved to make a voluntary defense on September 24, only if there is a consent or acceptance agreement with the parties of the interim championship bout, as it has been the case in many occasions in the past.
3. Based on all considerations, including the last 5 fights of the 3 boxers, the WBC has decided that:
a) A split of 65-35% is applied if Klitschko is not approved to fight on September 24.
b) However, a split of 55-45% will be applied if Vitali is approved to fight on September 24.
4. If Klitschko does not fight on September 24, the winner of Rahman and Barrett must be ready and medically approved to fight Klitschko within 6 to 8 weeks after the August 13 bout.
5. If Klitschko is allowed to fight on September 24, the winners of the interim championship fight and champion Klitschko’s fight must be ready to fight for the undisputed WBC title no later than December 2005.
No responses as to why this was necessary?
I voted steroids, but I dunno maybe he was scared of Rahman's right hand who knows. There was definitely something wierd going on. LOL at option #2.
now rahman is not very talented or skilled, but he does have some decent wins and performances.
for instance, his right hand laid out an out of shape lennox lewis. rahman beat a younger, fresher in-shape, corrie sanders.
what are brittley's signature performances? losing to an out of shape lewis, and beating a fat old corrie sanders.
http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-article.php?article=2373
Boxing News: WBC KOs Klitschko-Brock
The WBC stepped up to the plate and put the kibosh on the bout between Vitali Klitschko and Calvin Brock in September. Bowing to public pressure and the haranguing of the press, the WBC’s Board of Governors just released a statement announcing the news.
The Board of Governors of the World Boxing Council, presided by doctor Jose Sulaiman, announces from its offices in Mexico City that a final decision has been taken in regards to the heavyweight division, as follows:
1. The WBC requires that Vitali Klitschko make his following defense against the interim champion, winner of the Rahman-Barrett fight of August 13, 2005 in Chicago to comply with the WBC Rules and Regulations for a champion.
2. Vitali Klitschko would be approved to make a voluntary defense on September 24, only if there is a consent or acceptance agreement with the parties of the interim championship bout, as it has been the case in many occasions in the past.
3. Based on all considerations, including the last 5 fights of the 3 boxers, the WBC has decided that:
a) A split of 65-35% is applied if Klitschko is not approved to fight on September 24.
b) However, a split of 55-45% will be applied if Vitali is approved to fight on September 24.
4. If Klitschko does not fight on September 24, the winner of Rahman and Barrett must be ready and medically approved to fight Klitschko within 6 to 8 weeks after the August 13 bout.
5. If Klitschko is allowed to fight on September 24, the winners of the interim championship fight and champion Klitschko’s fight must be ready to fight for the undisputed WBC title no later than December 2005.
The day you run out of topics about the former WBC champion Vitali Klitschko, you will attempt to commit suicide. Don't forget to send me your points prior, it would be a waste.
sure thing, but please answer the question.
why did brittley have to be forced by the wbc to fight rahman when they said "nyet!" to brittley's attempts to fight brock instead?
You are such a loser. Rahman is three leagues beneath Klitschko. Vitali could've beaten that waste with one are tied behind his back. But Vitali had injuries and retired. Get over it!
I agree. And I like Rahman. But Vitali would have KO'd him.
The day you run out of topics about the former WBC champion Vitali Klitschko, you will attempt to commit suicide. Don't forget to send me your points prior, it would be a waste.
You are such a loser. Rahman is three leagues beneath Klitschko. Vitali could've beaten that waste with one are tied behind his back. But Vitali had injuries and retired. Get over it!
Could have, should have, would have....boxing and life is about what you did.
brittley's best win= fat and old corrie sanders :rofl:
But let's not get off-topic. we all know brittley has a weak resume. that's a given.
but we should try to see why people think brittley had 2 be forced to fight rahman. why?
You are such a loser. Rahman is three leagues beneath Klitschko. Vitali could've beaten that waste with one are tied behind his back. But Vitali had injuries and retired. Get over it!