how did you score mayweather-de la hoya?

from the poll i can see that there are to many people on boxing scene that dont know anything about scoring a fight. how could any true boxing fan have mayweather winning that fight?? he ran for 12 rounds and never landed any hard shots. he fought like a coward as usual. dlh did fight him like a businessman who did not want to get hit either but at least he came foward and tried to put the pressure on mayweather. i only gave mayweahter 4 rounds and you would have to be a total idiot to give him even a draw. Says the cocksucker who thinks decision wins are useless anyway. Fuck you construction worker.

Same as Max Kellermann 117-111 mayweather.

It depends on what you call a dominating performance. If winning a bunch of close rounds is dominant, then yes it was dominant. No, to me a dominant performance is one in which the victor is the clear winner in the rounds he wins. Not one where your scorecard is filled in hesitatingly because you don't want to score the round 10-10 but you're not sure who will get the nod.

I scored Oscar one round ahead, but there were lots of rounds that could have gone either way. If you scored every single one of those for Floyd I could see a 116-112 finish in his favour, I had it 115-114 for De La Hoya. Fact about that fight is that Floyd landed the cleaner punches but De La Hoya landed the more effective punches. Neither gained the upper hand in terms of ring generalship, and they were both defending well, with Mayweather avoiding taking too much damage and Hoya picking off most of Floyd's flurries. A lot of rounds came down to who was actually pressing the action, and we all know who that was. Calling it a dominant performance by Mayweather is insane. He squeaked by and the result reflected that. Takng nothing away from Floyd for the victory, it's quite a name to have on your record, but if you call that a one-sided affair (as some of you seem to be doing) you're rewriting history. I thought he won a lot of those close rounds clearly... It depends on what you call a dominating performance. If winning a bunch of close rounds is dominant, then yes it was dominant. Barrera-Morales III was a dominant performance, even though Barrera just won a lot of those close rounds clearly.

I scored Oscar one round ahead, but there were lots of rounds that could have gone either way. If you scored every single one of those for Floyd I could see a 116-112 finish in his favour, I had it 115-114 for De La Hoya. Fact about that fight is that Floyd landed the cleaner punches but De La Hoya landed the more effective punches. Neither gained the upper hand in terms of ring generalship, and they were both defending well, with Mayweather avoiding taking too much damage and Hoya picking off most of Floyd's flurries. A lot of rounds came down to who was actually pressing the action, and we all know who that was. Calling it a dominant performance by Mayweather is insane. He squeaked by and the result reflected that. Takng nothing away from Floyd for the victory, it's quite a name to have on your record, but if you call that a one-sided affair (as some of you seem to be doing) you're rewriting history.

Negative Fucking 100 OH MY GOD! When did Harold Lederman get an account on here? He is the only person in the world who can give a score that fucked up.

115-112 for Floyd, but I could see 116-112 as well. No way DLH won that fight. What round did you score 10-8? I'm so confused by anyone who's scores don't add up to 238... there is no way any rounds should have been less than 10-9.

115-113 for Floyd. It was pretty close in the middle rounds, but floyd just dominated him at the end. Could also see 116-112 for floyd too.

it was a draw GodzHand, jswa17, me2007, paciello23, Super_Lightweight, TheEvilSaint lmao, why am I not surprised

History, Just curious but why do you have JT kd Pavlik in your sig when Pavlik put him to sleep?

I voted draw, but Floyd won by about 2 points.

]Pretty Boy Floyd dominated slow white boys bitchass. What white boy? :pat:

116 - 112 pbf. I couldn't give Oscar any more.

If I can get it off in one piece I would, so I could wear it myself. Seriously, can you smell pussy in that thing all day long or what? I'm considering growing one so anytime I'm down I can just huff the muff, know what I mean? lolz........sure.Flavor saver.

You wouldn't dare...... If I can get it off in one piece I would, so I could wear it myself. Seriously, can you smell pussy in that thing all day long or what? I'm considering growing one so anytime I'm down I can just huff the muff, know what I mean?

Sleep with one eye open tonight fucker, I may cut off that sexy 'stache of yours. You wouldn't dare......

Thats already been established......j/k:luvbed: Sleep with one eye open tonight fucker, I may cut off that sexy 'stache of yours.

I guess I'm a dipshit then, because I'm not a Mayweather lover either. Thats already been established......j/k:luvbed: Chuck Giampa is apparantly a dipshit or a nuthugger. I think it is a tad absurd to say that even one round wider than your score means someone is a dipshit/nuthugger. It's also a tad bit obsurd to have scored it that way but whatever....sorry to offend anyone,I just don't see how anyone could see it that way...it was a very close fight.

PBF by 1-2 points......anyone who thinks it was wider is a dipshit or a nuthugger. Chuck Giampa is apparantly a dipshit or a nuthugger. I think it is a tad absurd to say that even one round wider than your score means someone is a dipshit/nuthugger.

PBF by 1-2 points......anyone who thinks it was wider is a dipshit or a nuthugger. I guess I'm a dipshit then, because I'm not a Mayweather lover either.