What's so different???

GREAT!!! I am glad you are not leaving me! (*******beauty wipes sweat off of her brow!!*******)

Oh no!!! I'm busted!! Please Honey, do not leave me!! I can not live without you! This was nothing to me, honest!!!!!:puppy_dog :hitit::cop: Did you just so happen to read any of the thread, toy? It's actually pretty good. No arguing, name calling or drama!:banana: Of course! I read every word you type, dear.

You floozy. Are you cheating again? Oh no!!! I'm busted!! Please Honey, do not leave me!! I can not live without you! This was nothing to me, honest!!!!!:puppy_dog :hitit::cop: Did you just so happen to read any of the thread, toy? It's actually pretty good. No arguing, name calling or drama!:banana:

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! You floozy. Are you cheating again?

When you consider the Typical emotional and intellectual maturity of most posters on this site.. The common ideal of feminity would be showing your tits... That is why perhaps most are not seeing it... I am glad I at least had my suspicions..:lol1: PHEW!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

Really. I try to exude femininity, even through my posts, because I know many will believe I am an imposter. I have been told I am an alt, a man, a fat ugly woman, etc. LOL. It's all love, though.:cop: When you consider the Typical emotional and intellectual maturity of most posters on this site.. The common ideal of feminity would be showing your tits... That is why perhaps most are not seeing it... I am glad I at least had my suspicions..:lol1: PHEW!!!

I would like to address a certain point that keeps getting brought up: "Everyone always said they'd beat Mayweather...why would Hatton be any different?" Everyone always said that they'd beat Hatton too. More people have claimed that than those who have claimed they'd beat Mayweather...and yet none of them have yet. Hatton is the underdog, but dont make out that he's some kind of Rocky Balboa. He's never tasted defeat either.

Your use of logic, vocabulary and cool emotoinal response suggest a male Mind.. Your user name does not.. I was unsure until now... Really. I try to exude femininity, even through my posts, because I know many will believe I am an imposter. I have been told I am an alt, a man, a fat ugly woman, etc. LOL. It's all love, though.:cop:

:pat: Oh, ok. The sure brother was to you. Everyone seems to think I am a man. I get PM's asking me. LOL. Kayjay, you make solid points, my dear. Very objective and unbiased. Your use of logic, vocabulary and cool emotoinal response suggest a male Mind.. Your user name does not.. I was unsure until now...

:pat: Oh, ok. The sure brother was to you. Everyone seems to think I am a man. I get PM's asking me. LOL. Kayjay, you make solid points, my dear. Very objective and unbiased.

Sorry sister. So what about Hatton: people talk like he's some crude plodder, or slow and underskilled like Gatti. That's not him. He has physical limitations, as does everyone. But he's got incredible stamina. He doesn't come "straight in." He 'll get chest to chest with Mayweather without eating a right hand every time. He's a gamer, he always does that bit of extra to get the win. He's got the feet to corner Floyd. He's got a solid chin. He's not afraid to throw bombs (Oscar by contrast pockets his big hook when he doesn't have a stationary target, Hatton won't do that) even if they'll likely miss. He's willing to fight dirty (poor Oscar said he would, but that's not him). There are a number of things going in Hatton's favor here. With that said, I think Mayweather will cut him open and carve it out to hold on for a doctor's stoppage

Sure borther, sure. So you admit Matweather can be beaten, right? Every man can be beaten. And Mayweather just won a close SD against a guy who faded late. He's great, but like every great he's beatable. There's nothting wrong with picking Hatton to be the lucky guy; everyone loses eventually. I think Mayweather would beat Hatton comfortably about 8 out of every ten tries, but mayweather's ribs are made of bone, just like yours. One properly leveraged hook to the right spot could negate ten rounds of class boxing. oh i agree with you 100% K, mayweather can certainly be beaten. ur right, there is nothing wrong with picking hatton to be the lucky guy, and there is nothing wrong with saying hatton is gonna win. and also, there is nothing wrong with sayin mayweather is gonna win, but its near impossible to post here with a prediction cuz u get flamed INSTANTLY and get called a nuthugger. it almost seems like u cant be a fan of ANY fighter on these boards. but yea i agree with wut ur sayin and totally agree. but the way i see it is, hatton isnt the guy to beat mayweather, unless he gets "lucky". but very few have gotten lucky when in the ring with floyd, so i jus dont THINK ricky is the guy to beat him. does that mean he wont? of course not. if he does, then i give him props, if he doesnt, i give him props for trying. IMO, floyd wins by late stoppage, but it can also be ricky by late stoppage, or early stoppage, or any other way of winnning can happen for both guys, but these threads are for our opinions, and no one can say theirs without some immature ass callin them a nuthugger or a floydling or what have you. i hope they dont read this thread cuz i like this one.. props to the OP...

Sure borther, sure. So you admit Matweather can be beaten, right? Every man can be beaten. And Mayweather just won a close SD against a guy who faded late. He's great, but like every great he's beatable. There's nothting wrong with picking Hatton to be the lucky guy; everyone loses eventually. I think Mayweather would beat Hatton comfortably about 8 out of every ten tries, but mayweather's ribs are made of bone, just like yours. One properly leveraged hook to the right spot could negate ten rounds of class boxing. I do admit. EVERYONE can. I stated that earlier. By the by, I am a woman kayjay. Not a brother!!!!!:boxing: :boxing: :puppy_dog

Beauty, I don't mind the Dancing with the Stars; I doubt he's genuinely distracted. He's got big plans, he's a big thinker like Oscar and he's using that show to promote his career so he can become like Oscar and renovate the entire business of boxing. He'll keep in shape and he'll still train a ton.

Sure borther, sure. So you admit Matweather can be beaten, right? Every man can be beaten. And Mayweather just won a close SD against a guy who faded late. He's great, but like every great he's beatable. There's nothting wrong with picking Hatton to be the lucky guy; everyone loses eventually. I think Mayweather would beat Hatton comfortably about 8 out of every ten tries, but mayweather's ribs are made of bone, just like yours. One properly leveraged hook to the right spot could negate ten rounds of class boxing.

Sorry if I overreacted, but the kind of attitude that has ruined the boards is this "how could anyone ever think Mayweather could lose?" Too many boys (that's what they are) have this mentality and have stifled all possible discussion I realize you were looking for actual boxing reasons, and you tried to rule out rule out the replies that usually come with this. Why do I think Hatton has a CHANCE (like 25-30%, that's all)? Because next to Oscar Hatton is by far the best comp. Mayweather has faced, because Hatton has great footspeed and inexhaustible stamina, and b/c any man who has ever lived can be knocked out with a single perfect shot to at least three points on his torso, and Hatton knows how to land the relelvant punches. NOW I SAID A CHANCE! Do any of you think this is a 100% certainty? No problem. I agree actually. I never stated I thought Floyd was invincible. He is not. I am just wanting to know a little more about Hatton. Do not misinterpret, I love Floyd. Regardless of whether he wins or loses. However, I am a bit concerned about the Dancing With the Stars and it's appearance that he is pushing himself as a "star" more than focusing on the fight. I think he will win, but when you mention that 25-30%, that is significant. No matter how miniscule.

Sorry if I overreacted, but the kind of attitude that has ruined the boards is this "how could anyone ever think Mayweather could lose?" Too many boys (that's what they are) have this mentality and have stifled all possible discussion I realize you were looking for actual boxing reasons, and you tried to rule out rule out the replies that usually come with this. Why do I think Hatton has a CHANCE (like 25-30%, that's all)? Because next to Oscar Hatton is by far the best comp. Mayweather has faced, because Hatton has great footspeed and inexhaustible stamina, and b/c any man who has ever lived can be knocked out with a single perfect shot to at least three points on his torso, and Hatton knows how to land the relelvant punches. NOW I SAID A CHANCE! Do any of you think this is a 100% certainty? but us MEN who like floyd would like to discuss this fight in an adult manner and listen to all viewpoints. i know this is hard with some of the floyd fans on here thats truevery annoying, but this thread has been pretty good with the maturity level... plus, the so called "floydboyz" are jus as bad as the "hattonboyz" , are they not?

Sorry if I overreacted, but the kind of attitude that has ruined the boards is this "how could anyone ever think Mayweather could lose?" Too many boys (that's what they are) have this mentality and have stifled all possible discussion I realize you were looking for actual boxing reasons, and you tried to rule out rule out the replies that usually come with this. Why do I think Hatton has a CHANCE (like 25-30%, that's all)? Because next to Oscar Hatton is by far the best comp. Mayweather has faced, because Hatton has great footspeed and inexhaustible stamina, and b/c any man who has ever lived can be knocked out with a single perfect shot to at least three points on his torso, and Hatton knows how to land the relelvant punches. NOW I SAID A CHANCE! Do any of you think this is a 100% certainty?

Man no fight is 100% certain. And, I agree. Nothing in life is ever 100%.

Man no fight is 100% certain. Why do Mayweather fans get all upset that the whole world doesn't think every fight of his is a 100% guaranteed win for him? People who pick against him shouldn't need to explain themselves like that. It's not like ANYONE denies him his due credit. Another irrational Mayweather fanboy thread . . . . . . Oh, ok. Well, too bad you feel this way. I most certainly try to remain objective and just wanted opinions, other than those drenched in subjectivity because they "hate" Floyd. The only thing I find irrational is your inability to comprehend that I just wanted further insight, other than what seems to be the obvious. (ie. Mayweather's a prick, etc.)