If Mayweather Wins....

Only if he does it in impressive action is the general stance that most people are taking on here. Very frustrating that a fighter gets downgraded for playing defense in the ring, and not blocking punches with his face. exactly i dont get it either your supposed to hit and not get hit but if floyd beats hatton he still wont get any credit he's the most hated but deep down inside these haters know the truth its sad because even if i didnt like a particular boxer i wouldnt hate on him i will still respect him for his skills and accomplishments inside the ring

After further review, it looks like the chair umpire made a mistake, it actually is game, set, match. Here's why: Question: Have you seen Mayweather-Gatti and Mayweather-N'dou? You cannot honestly tell me that those fights were not exciting. If you do, that means that you only like extremely close slugfests, which means you are way too picky for this sport. Anyways, my point is that Mayweather beat the shit out of those two F's, but he pretty much never got hit. That is how Sugar Ray Robinson was able to be P4P #1 and be exciting. However, I have a hunch that SRR lost some of his excitement appeal when he fought Joey Maxim for the Lightheavyweight Title (I don't know, I haven't seen the fight. All I know is that Robinson collapsed from exhaustion). Anyways, Floyd was exciting (especially at 140) and he still continued to play defense. But when people call for a fighter to jump up 24 pounds higher than the weight he started his career at, he is going to be significantly outweight, and therefore, significantly overpowered. Demanding that a fighter make a fight an exciting slugfest with an opponent who came down from 160 when he came up from 147 is absurd. If 140 was the loaded division in boxing right now, I guarantee you Floyd would be P4P #1, and also one of the most exciting fighters in boxing. It is just unfortunate that everyone that Floyd is called out to fight is fucking huge compared to him (Cotto, Williams, Mosley , Margarito ). Seems like you have taken the baton, and ran with it to the finish line.

Game, Point, whoops! LOL Sugar Ray Robinson is consistently ranked as the #1 p4p of all time. Now, you're saying he wasn't an exciting fighter? LOL Don't be so hasty to win an argument. After further review, it looks like the chair umpire made a mistake, it actually is game, set, match. Here's why: Question: Have you seen Mayweather-Gatti and Mayweather-N'dou? You cannot honestly tell me that those fights were not exciting. If you do, that means that you only like extremely close slugfests, which means you are way too picky for this sport. Anyways, my point is that Mayweather beat the shit out of those two F's, but he pretty much never got hit. That is how Sugar Ray Robinson was able to be P4P #1 and be exciting. However, I have a hunch that SRR lost some of his excitement appeal when he fought Joey Maxim for the Lightheavyweight Title (I don't know, I haven't seen the fight. All I know is that Robinson collapsed from exhaustion). Anyways, Floyd was exciting (especially at 140) and he still continued to play defense. But when people call for a fighter to jump up 24 pounds higher than the weight he started his career at, he is going to be significantly outweight, and therefore, significantly overpowered. Demanding that a fighter make a fight an exciting slugfest with an opponent who came down from 160 when he came up from 147 is absurd. If 140 was the loaded division in boxing right now, I guarantee you Floyd would be P4P #1, and also one of the most exciting fighters in boxing. It is just unfortunate that everyone that Floyd is called out to fight is fucking huge compared to him (Cotto, Williams, Mosley , Margarito ).

And all I am saying is there is nothing more to say cough*free post*cough. Damn this cold. ..............agreed...

And, all I'm saying is that his argument is flawed. Nothing more, nothing less. And all I am saying is there is nothing more to say cough*free post*cough. Damn this cold.

The argument had nothing to do with SRR, since he was an exciting p4p #1. All he was saying is that isn't the case with most p4p fighters, that was all nothing more nothing less. And, all I'm saying is that his argument is flawed. Nothing more, nothing less.

That's not "nit picking." It looks to me like you're the one "nit picking" here. I'm sincerely glad he qualified his post with the word "rarely." But, it just so happens that SRR is generally considered THE #1 p4p. I wonder why? And, it wasn't because he was BORING. The argument had nothing to do with SRR, since he was an exciting p4p #1. All he was saying is that isn't the case with most p4p fighters, that was all nothing more nothing less.

My freind Wiley there you go nit picking again budd. Did you not see him say RARLEY. Rarley as in not EVERYONE but THE MAJORITY. Whitaker, Mayweather, Hopkins were all p4p #1 and all weren't the most exciting of fighters. That's not "nit picking." It looks to me like you're the one "nit picking" here. I'm sincerely glad he qualified his post with the word "rarely." But, it just so happens that SRR is generally considered THE #1 p4p. I wonder why? And, it wasn't because he was BORING.

Game, Point, whoops! LOL Sugar Ray Robinson is consistently ranked as the #1 p4p of all time. Now, you're saying he wasn't an exciting fighter? LOL Don't be so hasty to win an argument. My freind Wiley there you go nit picking again budd. Did you not see him say RARLEY. Rarley as in not EVERYONE but THE MAJORITY. Whitaker, Mayweather, Hopkins were all p4p #1 and all weren't the most exciting of fighters.

You never answered this: Floyd wins his fights... he causes more damage to his opponents than they cause to him. I don't know why people criticize Floyd because he doesn't get hit... it seems to be an overall good strategy to employ. Have you ever noticed that the exciting fighters are rarely P4P #1? That's because the exciting fighters get hit a lot, shortening their career, or causing them to lose. I made the baseball analogy in another thread. Just because a team with a lead going into the 9th doesn't purposely put the tying run on base, does that hurt the game of baseball? No. Does it make the game a little more boring? Yes. But why the fuck would anyone, in any kind of competition give away their advantages against their opponent? I can't think of a good answer, can you? Game, Point, whoops! LOL Sugar Ray Robinson is consistently ranked as the #1 p4p of all time. Now, you're saying he wasn't an exciting fighter? LOL Don't be so hasty to win an argument.

Of course he won't. Some of the fools on here think he isn't pound for pound #1 as crazy as that sounds. Pacquiao #1 please...

Thank you for being consistent. Good pwnage. Dios: "Floyd's not getting any credit, but Hatton sucks and even his fans know it."

I dont know. I just cannot wait till the fight! Rickys training like a dog. \he is gonna get inside and make opportunitys count and he does realize the task in hand and will he be up for it? OH YES, he will. Hes a winner he'll give every inch of himself and bare his very soul in pursuit of victory. Ricky at his very best against Mayweather is Duran to Leanard. I believe this to be so due to the charactors, heart and abilities. A little premature? Yes! All said, Rick at his peak phissically and rellentles mentalty will give Floyd hell! And I will be routing for my fellow brit all the way. Though I fear it will still wont quite be enough against Floyds skills ( which I admire SOO much) Leanard Is my favorite out of the Fab 4 in the 80s!!!!! Come on Ricky. You have to want it sooo bad oooo sooo bad. You'll do us proud and be humble till the bitter end. Excited and emotional incresingly, I am about this fight!!!! Just a shame We have to wait till 8.12.07:boxing: :boxing:

No. They won't . Because even the Hattonettes know in their hearts that Ricky will lose. Ricky knows it, too. And the sad part is that Floyd will beat Ricky's ass without even focusing on the fight. Thank you for being consistent.

Of course floyd will get credit no matter what anybody thinks of Hattons in ring abilities. What matters here the most is Hatton's Identity. The identity he will bring into that ring when he faces floys is that he is 43-0, that he is The Ring Magazine Jr. Welterweight Champion of the world and that he is recognized by the majority of credible people as a top 10 p4p fighter in the world. And of course Hatton is younger then floyd and is also in his prime. Whether that prime will help him win this fight is a completely different issue. Floyd will dominate this fight and retire Hatton Tito Trinidad style and add another Top fighter to his Resume. Case Closed.......bring on the cotto vs mosley winner __________________

Of course floyd will get credit no matter what anybody thinks of Hattons in ring abilities. What matters here the most is Hatton's Identity. The identity he will bring into that ring when he faces floys is that he is 43-0, that he is The Ring Magazine Jr. Welterweight Champion of the world and that he is recognized by the majority of credible people as a top 10 p4p fighter in the world. And of course Hatton is younger then floyd and is also in his prime. Whether that prime will help him win this fight is a completely different issue. Floyd will dominate this fight and retire Hatton Tito Trinidad style and add another Top fighter to his Resume. Case Closed........Bring on the Cotto vs Mosley winner

You never answered this: Floyd wins his fights... he causes more damage to his opponents than they cause to him. I don't know why people criticize Floyd because he doesn't get hit... it seems to be an overall good strategy to employ. Have you ever noticed that the exciting fighters are rarely P4P #1? That's because the exciting fighters get hit a lot, shortening their career, or causing them to lose. I made the baseball analogy in another thread. Just because a team with a lead going into the 9th doesn't purposely put the tying run on base, does that hurt the game of baseball? No. Does it make the game a little more boring? Yes. But why the fuck would anyone, in any kind of competition give away their advantages against their opponent? I can't think of a good answer, can you? Point.........Game...........Match.

IT depends on how Mayweather beats him. If its another Rocky Balboa trying to catch the chicken fight decision, then Floyd still has a ways to go to live up to the hype. If, on the other hand, Floyd throws down and defeats Hatton, then alot of questions will be answered. You never answered this: Floyd wins his fights... he causes more damage to his opponents than they cause to him. I don't know why people criticize Floyd because he doesn't get hit... it seems to be an overall good strategy to employ. Have you ever noticed that the exciting fighters are rarely P4P #1? That's because the exciting fighters get hit a lot, shortening their career, or causing them to lose. I made the baseball analogy in another thread. Just because a team with a lead going into the 9th doesn't purposely put the tying run on base, does that hurt the game of baseball? No. Does it make the game a little more boring? Yes. But why the fuck would anyone, in any kind of competition give away their advantages against their opponent? I can't think of a good answer, can you?

By "exposed as a fraud", do you mean "on the P4P list for ten years and on top of the list for three years"? That kind of "exposed"? He's not top of any of my lists...apart from the one labelled 'dim witted midget who likes hitting women''

Collazo has tattoos. Floyd does not. lmfao! yes it makes a differnce lol