The WBA is the oldest (I believe) but I have heard some people mention that the WBO has the best match ups and the fairest title shots. What do you think?
Agree the Ring Magazine holds the most weight with me and most other hardcore fans.
Out of the actual physical belts I believe the WBC has been the top one.
In terms of looks pure looks I like them in this order:
WBC (by far)
IBF
WBO
WBA
I dont care but the belt that i really like is the WBC. It the best looking belt of all by faaaar xD, thats why i would like to have that one :P
the WBA is the loveliest piece of boxing drapery
http://www.boxinggame.com/tbgpros/2704045/wba.jpg
The WBO stinks
http://www.boxing.net.au/images/logos/WBO-belt.jpg
The WBC is minimalist and very hip
http://www.boxinggame.com/tbgpros/2704045/wbc.jpg
The IBF is classiest of them all, fit for a king
http://ringsidereport.com/iBF_belt.jpg
The title that has the most meaning is the Ring Magazine champion.
WBA is the worst. WBC leaves a lot to be desired. WBO and IBF have some good champions like Calzaghe and Wlad, and at least enforce their mandatories sooner. The WBO seems to have more frequent eliminator matches (to determine the #1 mandatory) and that's something positive I would like to see the others do.
:ugh: Shocker
Anyways yeah the WBC is by far the most prestidgeous belt, and the one the best fighters tend to have i think,
WBO is by far the worst, mainly a belt for protected fighters and paper champs, i dont really need to name names.