Is that when a fighter becomes a champion in one of the organizations, the rest of them takes that fighter off their belt rankings! If they just included the other ABC belt champions on their rankings and treated them like a normal fighter, ignoring the fact that theyre a champion in a DIFFERENT organization, then the champions would be fighting each other constantly!
I mean, every single other belt would be rating Wladimir as the #1 mandatory, wouldnt they? I dont even have a real big problem with so many belts, Id prefer less, but in a way its like picking up puzzle pieces if you try to make the best of things.
But these stupid decisions like this make them just a pain in the ass. Mandatory title defences would actually put champions against other champions...
________
NEW JERSEY MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES
I don't really mind it when one fighter stands out from the rest .
Like at middleweight you had #1. Hopkins #2. Joppy #3. Holmes
Everyone knew that Hopkins was the best way before any of them ever fought but it still gave you a chance to see the others on Tv from time to time .
The belts help fighters gain media attention which is good for the sport but there should always be a clear #1 champion at all times.
Maybe instead of ABC belts you could have 2 interim champions behind the real title holder.