ricky hatton can only beat 2 (at beast) welterweights

ricky hatton better take care of his body, because if he moves to welterweight he wont SMELL a title i only see this guy beating 2 welterweights at best 1.mayweather-LOSE 2.mosley-LOSE 3.cotto-styles make fights and cotto would brutally beat hatton 4.baldomir- too big LOSE 5.margarito-too big LOSE 6.williams- too big LOSE 7.judah-could go either way depending on which judah shows it 8.citron-LOSE 9.clottey-LOSE 10.quitana-LOSE i think urkal could out point hatton i think not. rh v pbf-split decision either way rh v ssm-ko via body attack rh wins rh v mc-too tough to call rh v baldo who? dont forget he only had a shock win over a glass chin over the hill sad "super"judah rh v am could be a good one....if the cuddling doesnt get in the way. rh v zj-forget it, judahs a wanker. rh v kermit the frog-ricky to win with ease. rh v snotty clottey-oh plz. rh v paul williams is alot more interesting than quitana now it could go either way and i bet williams would beat floyd after a couple more fights. im sure of it. and lastly urkal is not good enough. dont forget ricky moved up to welterweight and fought a slick operator in luis collazo who was a world champion.he had him over straight away and took his belt but, very nearly came unstuck in the last round. still took his belt though. how can ricky be judged as a shit fighter? is it because hes british? anyway statistically us brits are far better than the yanks as were a far smaller nation and with what little we do have in terms of pro fighters were better. examples. bob fitzsimmons,randyturpin,henry cooper,joe calzaghe,lennox lewis,nigel benn,chris eubank,michael watson,lloyd honeygan,naseem hamed,carl froch,amir khan,barry mcguigan,jim watt,ken buchannan, all these fighters have significant wins over american fighters but are probbly still underated or some lame excuse given by the yanks for those losses. so if floyd does lose is he gonna say....its not my fault? probably.

He lost and was exposed. Actually he won, by unanimous decision. He may have been exposed, but he definately won the rematch, so I don't know how he was exposed, ever heard of a bad night?

That's where your wrong. Alot of the press row had the fight for Floyd and I believe Dan Rafael also had it for Floyd. He lost and was exposed.

hes fighting the supposedly best fighter in the world next, what more do u want? Good job replying to a post a year later... :pat:

It is fairly simple, the fact that Castillo ran Mayweather close shows that Mayweather is not indomitable and is therefore beatable. You nutz? you saying Castillo 'exposed' mayweather, even though he won the 1st fight with one hand, the second won most people think he won decively, :lol1:

which ever way you spin it, mayweather should have a loss on his record. Only idiotic die hard mayweather fans scored the first fight to mayweather. That's where your wrong. Alot of the press row had the fight for Floyd and I believe Dan Rafael also had it for Floyd.

i only thought they won 3 rounds each (second castillo fight) imo thats dominating a fight I don't think he dominated De La Hoya and I don't recall the fight with Judah all that well but other than he has dominated everyone else although the quality of some of the opposition has to be questioned.

i only thought they won 3 rounds each (second castillo fight) imo thats dominating a fight Thats exactly how I thought about the Judah and De la Hoya fights. The 2nd Castillo fight I can't remember how many rounds either of them won but I know he made Castillo miss a lot just like he did in the first fight.

which ever way you spin it, mayweather should have a loss on his record. Only idiotic die hard mayweather fans scored the first fight to mayweather.

What do you mean dominated? If you mean won then you are right but if you mean won easily then you are sadly wrong. He easily showed he was the better fighter and I hope your not saying the second fight was close.

Tackie, Magee, Thaxton and Phillips. I don't know if they are on youtube but the shouldn't be too hard to find. The bit in bold is not bullshit. I am not saying that any fighter could expose those weaknesses but the fact that they have been exposed would surely be something for anyone who fights Mayweather in the future to consider going into the fight. Fighters may give away rounds to rest but I think it is fair to say that Judah, De La Hoya and Castillo all won rounds against Floyd on their own merit as opposed to simply capitalising on tiredness. i only thought they won 3 rounds each (second castillo fight) imo thats dominating a fight

Tackie, Magee, Thaxton and Phillips. I don't know if they are on youtube but the shouldn't be too hard to find. The bit in bold is not bullshit. I am not saying that any fighter could expose those weaknesses but the fact that they have been exposed would surely be something for anyone who fights Mayweather in the future to consider going into the fight. Fighters may give away rounds to rest but I think it is fair to say that Judah, De La Hoya and Castillo all won rounds against Floyd on their own merit as opposed to simply capitalising on tiredness. You did say any opponent now that you clarified its a little different. Also you can't say because something worked one round that its a weakness thats been exposed because adjustments are always made. Just like I can agree that all the fighters you named one rounds on they're own merit but once PBF made adjustments they could no longer capitalize on what they thought was a exposed weakness.

Please give me a fight of Hatton's that I could possibly find on youtube that would show me Hatton's boxing skills. Also having underrated boxing skills and very good boxing skills are worlds apart. Nobody biased or not has ever said Hatton has very good boxing skills. The bold is just utter and complete bullshit. The bold is just sad come on now I know you can do better than that. So you telling me a fighter like Gatti could do the same shit to win a round against PBF as De la Hoya did? You see how stupid that comment was. Also that argument doesn't take into account a fighter giving away a round to rest. PBF has not been exposed and Hatton is not going to be the one to expose him either. Tackie, Magee, Thaxton and Phillips. I don't know if they are on youtube but the shouldn't be too hard to find. The bit in bold is not bullshit. I am not saying that any fighter could expose those weaknesses but the fact that they have been exposed would surely be something for anyone who fights Mayweather in the future to consider going into the fight. Fighters may give away rounds to rest but I think it is fair to say that Judah, De La Hoya and Castillo all won rounds against Floyd on their own merit as opposed to simply capitalising on tiredness.

Hatton's boxing skills are underrated but that is besides the point here. My understanding of the word exposed, in this context, is that Mayweather showed weaknesses that could be exploited by any potential opponent and therefore I would suggest that anyone who has beaten Floyd in a round of boxing has shown a way to beat him. Please give me a fight of Hatton's that I could possibly find on youtube that would show me Hatton's boxing skills. Also having underrated boxing skills and very good boxing skills are worlds apart. Nobody biased or not has ever said Hatton has very good boxing skills. The bold is just utter and complete bullshit. The bold is just sad come on now I know you can do better than that. So you telling me a fighter like Gatti could do the same shit to win a round against PBF as De la Hoya did? You see how stupid that comment was. Also that argument doesn't take into account a fighter giving away a round to rest. PBF has not been exposed and Hatton is not going to be the one to expose him either.

You didn't explain anything. Castillo lost both fights. PBF was hurt in the 1st fight which was close and controversial to some. Castillo is EASILY beat in the rematch when PBF is 100%. Those things have somehow exposed PBF. This exposure is not adding up. Since Castillo has laid this so called blueprint many have tried it and many have lost. Pressure and rough house tactics is not the way to beat PBF. I think it is going to take a combination of pressure and very skilled boxing to beat PBF. Hatton can bring pressure but he is not a very skilled boxer. Hatton's boxing skills are underrated but that is besides the point here. My understanding of the word exposed, in this context, is that Mayweather showed weaknesses that could be exploited by any potential opponent and therefore I would suggest that anyone who has beaten Floyd in a round of boxing has shown a way to beat him.

in the rematch floyd won easy and has dominated all his fights since then so how has he been exposed? What do you mean dominated? If you mean won then you are right but if you mean won easily then you are sadly wrong.

someone please explain to me how mayweather was exposed at lightweight (first fight with castillo) and we learned he had hurt his left rotater cup (hence the use of his leaping left hook diminished after round 2) and then we had the rematch in which he was healthy and he dominated...please explain the exposure to me one more time

It is fairly simple, the fact that Castillo ran Mayweather close shows that Mayweather is not indomitable and is therefore beatable. You didn't explain anything. Castillo lost both fights. PBF was hurt in the 1st fight which was close and controversial to some. Castillo is EASILY beat in the rematch when PBF is 100%. Those things have somehow exposed PBF. This exposure is not adding up. Since Castillo has laid this so called blueprint many have tried it and many have lost. Pressure and rough house tactics is not the way to beat PBF. I think it is going to take a combination of pressure and very skilled boxing to beat PBF. Hatton can bring pressure but he is not a very skilled boxer.

It is fairly simple, the fact that Castillo ran Mayweather close shows that Mayweather is not indomitable and is therefore beatable. in the rematch floyd won easy and has dominated all his fights since then so how has he been exposed?

Hatton fought Collazo at short notice and put on weight too fast, too soon, resulting in a sloppy performance (which he still won). Generalising about a fighters potential performance in a division after that preparation is not going to be very accurate. Try and remember what happened to Mayweather when he was exposed by Castillo at a lighter weight. that sounds like excuses. collazo was just the better man. if hatton can't make weight thats his fault no one elses