I want to get some of the more intelligent hardcore boxing guys thoughts about the points brought up in this article. Thoughts?
Found a really good article talking about the differences.
http://www.insidefighting.com/betweenRoundsDisp.aspx?uid=3534
“The Shovel and the Epee”: Striking in Boxing and MMA - 4/10/2007
by Sam Sheridan
As Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) skyrockets in popularity, the resistance of mainstream media outlets (Sports Illustrated and ESPN) has historically probably been due to a fear of pro-wrestling combined with old-school boxing writers lack of understanding. Boxing writers love boxing; and they often feel, correctly, that MMA fighters usually aren’t the best boxers.
They may not realize that the guy in there who is boxing so badly is an Olympic wrestler and submission expert—but strict boxing fans mentally “turn-off” the moment the fight hits the ground, and so are unable to appreciate the skill and art of ground-fighting. “Ground-and-pound” is a rough art. But MMA fans who “get” the ground game will take as much joy from a ground war as they will a stand-up one.
There is more to the debate, however—MMA striking is fundamentally different than boxing, for a variety of reasons. Over years of observing the sport, I kept noticing pro boxers making the switch to MMA and getting ‘out-struck.’ When Jens Pulver fought Takanori Gomi in 2004 in Pride, Jens had been winning pro boxing fights and knocking people out; I thought there was no way in hell Gomi could stand with him, but Jens was outgunned by a bigger man and lost by TKO.
Yosuke Nishijima, a former NABO Cruiserweight Champion with a pro boxing record of 24-2-1 went 0-4 in Pride, a top MMA organization. He went into the clinch with Evangelista “Cyborg” Santos and was throwing body shots while Cyborg threw knees—much heavier.
More recently, Drew Mcfedries with 5 MMA fights out-struck Alessio Sakara, who had won professional and amateur boxing titles in Italy. Drew is explosive and iron-chinned, but it was still an interesting result.
I recently had a long internet discussion with Carlo Rotella, a professor at Boston College who wrote “Cut Time,” a terrific book in which he established himself as one of the great thinkers and writers on boxing—I avidly pursued him with the intention of picking his brain. He isn’t an MMA fan, although he may be starting to come around. I tried to explain some of the differences that I noticed, and some of the reasons that pro boxers might get out-struck in MMA. The “stand-up” part of MMA isn’t boxing, or kick-boxing or Muay Thai—it’s its own thing....
Read the rest at http://www.insidefighting.com/betweenRoundsDisp.aspx?uid=3534
One has to remember, MMA events and boxing are both sporting events with specialized rules in each venue which a person must train for specifically. Make a MMAer fight by boxing rules against a decent boxer and he loses. Make a boxer with no MMA experience fight a good MMAer and he loses.
Thanks for the reminder....
I'm sure everyone on these boards will forget that principle every time a new thread is made.
:gives:
Thanks again for your input, though.
Yeah, that article really had a nice fresh view point of striking. Footwork and striking always has to adapt to what factors are in play. Anyone who says otherwise needs to learn the dynamics of fighting. Saying MMA footwork would kill boxing is just stupid, since boxing footwork is refined for the factors in play. And the same principle applies in the reverse situation.
One has to remember, MMA events and boxing are both sporting events with specialized rules in each venue which a person must train for specifically. Make a MMAer fight by boxing rules against a decent boxer and he loses. Make a boxer with no MMA experience fight a good MMAer and he loses.