Great Trilogies

Morales vs. Pacquiao <--- it was a trilogy that broke lots of hearts :lol1: yep,it is broke my heart. i like both them though.

IMO if Morales and Barrera fought together for about 10 fight most of it will go for Barrera. Barrera kept rebuilding himseld after every deaft he got and got this attiude that he is going to beat anyone the beaten him. I'd like to see Barrera rebuild himself against Pacquiao; I don't think he'd last more than 5 rounds. 10 fights? Nice level of conjecture to prove a point...:ugh:

Have you considered the difference in quality of opposition that Morales has fought in the last two years in comparison to Barrera? Obviously not. If Barrera had fought these fights (including moving up to 135), he wouldn't be top ten lb-4-lb. IMO if Morales and Barrera fought together for about 10 fight most of it will go for Barrera. Barrera kept rebuilding himseld after every deaft he got and got this attiude that he is going to beat anyone the beaten him.

Have you considered the difference in quality of opposition that Morales has fought in the last two years in comparison to Barrera? Obviously not. If Barrera had fought these fights (including moving up to 135), he wouldn't be top ten lb-4-lb. This is true. If Barrera had faced Jesus Chavez at 135, chances are he might have lost. Morales has taken tougher tests than Barrera for his last 5 or 6 fights.

Barrera won Morales twice. even if the first fight was robbed and the second one was gifted so it cancels out. and in most 10 ten p4p mexician they alway rank barrera better than morales as well as p4p barrera been in 10 p4p for couple of weeks while morales is out of the top 10 Have you considered the difference in quality of opposition that Morales has fought in the last two years in comparison to Barrera? Obviously not. If Barrera had fought these fights (including moving up to 135), he wouldn't be top ten lb-4-lb.

morales pac aint even historic an old morales beat pac then he got real real old and had no legs onw fight where they where close to there peak but was morales still past his prime, and pac left the ring crying, xahir raheem fight is evidence of how he lost his legs and speed

Pure destruction! It broke a lot of hearts... and floods a lot of tears... :lol1: :haha: thats what i mean!

Pacquiao-Morales: Pure drama...

Ali-Frazier Ali-Norton Bowe-Holyfield Gonzalez-Carbajal Barrera-Morales Gatti-Ward Pacquiao-Morales

barrera morales 3 should of been a draw the blind judge gave barrera that round when he was about to colapse letterman did to, if they scroed that round correctly iut would of been a draw barrera edge out tge first and morales did the second MAB-EM 1: Barrera won MAB-EM 2: Morales won MAB-EM 3: Barrera won and it was clear. Morales had a broken nose and didnt want to fight. Barrera that night did everything better than morales in every department

Barrera won Morales twice. even if the first fight was robbed and the second one was gifted so it cancels out. and in most 10 ten p4p mexician they alway rank barrera better than morales as well as p4p barrera been in 10 p4p for couple of weeks while morales is out of the top 10 barrera morales 3 should of been a draw the blind judge gave barrera that round when he was about to colapse letterman did to, if they scroed that round correctly iut would of been a draw barrera edge out tge first and morales did the second

At 122 Morales is definitely better because he KO'd Jones, who beat Barrera twice. Barrera has been better in recent years, but Pacquiao beat his ass the first time they fought and probably will again, and Erik was able to beat Manny when they first fought. Styles do make fights but these wins over Manny and JJ definitely help Erik when you compare him with Barrera Barrera won Morales twice. even if the first fight was robbed and the second one was gifted so it cancels out. and in most 10 ten p4p mexician they alway rank barrera better than morales as well as p4p barrera been in 10 p4p for couple of weeks while morales is out of the top 10

You are using the fights between them to come to your conclusion. Think of other opponents that both Morales and Barrera faced. What about Pacquiao or Junior Jones? Barrera has the style to beat Morales and Morales also has the style to beat him. Their fights will always be wars, but what about other common opponents? I say Barrera is the better pure boxer, but Morales is the better brawler and has more heart. At 122 Morales is definitely better because he KO'd Jones, who beat Barrera twice. Barrera has been better in recent years, but Pacquiao beat his ass the first time they fought and probably will again, and Erik was able to beat Manny when they first fought. Styles do make fights but these wins over Manny and JJ definitely help Erik when you compare him with Barrera

What's your favorite boxing trilogy or trilogies ever? There have been several classic ones throughout the sport's history. However, there seems to be some that come to mind quicker than others. Some of these boxing trilogies are stuck in the mind of boxing fans and become truly unforgettable. From the minimum weights and up to the heavyweights, many compelling trilogies have taken place. Without further ado, which are your favorite boxing trilogies and why? I will provide a list of some, feel free to comment. Ali vs. Frazier Griffith vs. Paret Carbajal vs. Gonzalez Holyfield vs. Bowe Gatti vs. Ward Morales vs. Barrera Morales vs. Pacquiao Gatti vs. Ward or Morales vs. Pacquaio.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmgQfHHGcA4&mode=related&search= this is the greatest trilogy of alltime

Morales is alway been a better boxer but he could brawl once in a while. If you notice how morales wont Pac in the first fight by boxing and using the jab. The guy got reach and hieght to control the fight. but the problem with morales is that he go so much pride and feel like he is a pussy if he he backup and that is a wrong thing to be put in the mind and that what makes people think that he is a better brawler than Barrera is the attuide. Morales is very courageous, no doubt. I see Morales as a more effective brawler, mainly because of his size advantage over many opponents. I don't say that his skills are lame because they are not. He has great skills and is one of my favorite boxers ever, but I don't say that Barrera is a bad brawler because he is effective himself. However, Barrera has to be competitive against Pacquiao to make me think that he is a more effective brawler than Erik.

You are using the fights between them to come to your conclusion. Think of other opponents that both Morales and Barrera faced. What about Pacquiao or Junior Jones? Barrera has the style to beat Morales and Morales also has the style to beat him. Their fights will always be wars, but what about other common opponents? I say Barrera is the better pure boxer, but Morales is the better brawler and has more heart. Morales is alway been a better boxer but he could brawl once in a while. If you notice how morales wont Pac in the first fight by boxing and using the jab. The guy got reach and hieght to control the fight. but the problem with morales is that he go so much pride and feel like he is a pussy if he he backup and that is a wrong thing to be put in the mind and that what makes people think that he is a better brawler than Barrera is the attuide.

lets review the MAB-EM fight. MAB-EM 1: It was a brawling fight from the start. It was close but i give MAB the win. I think MAB was robbed thee MAB-EM 2: both fight where cautious so it was a more boxing and Morales won IMO. MAB-EM 3: MAB won in every angle of the fight he was a better boxer and brawler. EM didnt want to fight anymore after that. bodywise Morales have a better reach advantge that MAB and that helps him alot in boxing around espically thhe first Pac fight. MAB lost to Pac because he underestimated him and was toe-to-toe and wanted to brawl he didnt move around the ring like he did with Jaruez. who is better EM or MAB? I would say MAB because every lose MAB get he comes better than before. usually when you underestimat a fight like MAB did during the Pac fight and Pac during Morales fight it cause a loss. You are using the fights between them to come to your conclusion. Think of other opponents that both Morales and Barrera faced. What about Pacquiao or Junior Jones? Barrera has the style to beat Morales and Morales also has the style to beat him. Their fights will always be wars, but what about other common opponents? I say Barrera is the better pure boxer, but Morales is the better brawler and has more heart.

I have to disagree here. Morales was a better and stronger brawler than Barrera. Pacquiao will walk through everything that Barrera brings and will stop him earlier this time around. I am not even a big Pacquiao fan, just in case. lets review the MAB-EM fight. MAB-EM 1: It was a brawling fight from the start. It was close but i give MAB the win. I think MAB was robbed thee MAB-EM 2: both fight where cautious so it was a more boxing and Morales won IMO. MAB-EM 3: MAB won in every angle of the fight he was a better boxer and brawler. EM didnt want to fight anymore after that. bodywise Morales have a better reach advantge that MAB and that helps him alot in boxing around espically thhe first Pac fight. MAB lost to Pac because he underestimated him and was toe-to-toe and wanted to brawl he didnt move around the ring like he did with Jaruez. who is better EM or MAB? I would say MAB because every lose MAB get he comes better than before. usually when you underestimat a fight like MAB did during the Pac fight and Pac during Morales fight it cause a loss.

MAB is a different fighter than morales. He is the type of fighter will move around if he is in danger. It shows that he could win a discesion against Jaurez with one hand. As well as he is a better brawler than morales is I have to disagree here. Morales was a better and stronger brawler than Barrera. Pacquiao will walk through everything that Barrera brings and will stop him earlier this time around. I am not even a big Pacquiao fan, just in case.