Could the Peter/Toney decision been influenced by $$$?

Toney won the fight. I can imagine Peter getting the dec cos he`s worth more being younger and a puncher.

this sorta stuff makes me wanna stop watchin boxin Stop watching boxing?? :eek: Naaa!

if many ppl bet on the underdog, he is not an underdog anymore, bcos the odds are progressively shifted... or not? thats not true. u can be a huge underdog, but there are people who still think that the fighter thats the underdog, could pull off the upset like baldomir vs mayweather. BALDY is most definetly the HUGE underdog in this fight, but there are still people that believe he can win. doesnt make him any less of an underdog, u know? and i wouldnt be surprised if that fight was influenced by $$$, but i doubt it

Betting lines are not created by who Vegas thinks is gonna win, but how the vegas predicts people will bet. This is why very popular teams like Notre Dame and USC get such larger spreads than seems logical...because theyre fanatic fan bases are the type of fan base that also bets a lot.

Maybe fights disputed like this should be reviewed after the fact by a seperate panel of judges and rescored or something......but yeah it is always about Money and some people don't want the fair outcome.Hell I bet on Peter and forrest and it appears they both lost but I will take my Money without complaining because I have also been on the other end of the shit stick....... you had Peter winning. Get lost

Back in the day even the bogus sanctioning bodies would order an immediate rematch, that is the only solution.

Maybe fights disputed like this should be reviewed after the fact by a seperate panel of judges and rescored or something......but yeah it is always about Money and some people don't want the fair outcome.Hell I bet on Peter and forrest and it appears they both lost but I will take my Money without complaining because I have also been on the other end of the shit stick.......

this sorta stuff makes me wanna stop watchin boxin

There's no other explanation for it

I don't give a fuck what behind these bs decisions, but It makes me sick to my stomach nowing that if I watch a fight in which one fighter is doinating the other(like the Forrest fight for example) there seems to be a strong chance someone will get fucked sideways

Aint bad decisions always based on money.

Could the Peter/Toney decision been influenced by $$$? :rolleyes: People are still complaining.... Come on, this is as clear as daylight. Toney was the underdog for the fight, while most experts were picking him to win the fight. Were they wrong, no... When you have millions and millions of dollars at stake, people betting on the underdog Toney (that's like putting money in the bank)... Expect corrupt decisions to be made. Plain and simple if many ppl bet on the underdog, he is not an underdog anymore, bcos the odds are progressively shifted... or not?