sergio wont be undefeated much longer.

Well you posted that comment in reference to a Mora opponent and why they "cover up" if Mora is throwing punches. Well you cant win fights by eating punches no matter how much or how little power your opponent has. When Mayorga dropped his hands against TITO at the end of the 1st round he was already hurt. Well you got part of this right. I had to go to the archives and watch that round again. 2 minutes into the fight, Tito catches Mayo with 2 consecutive left hooks but Mayo was not hurt and he dropped his hands and motions by punching himself in the face, hit me some more and Tito does hit him again with 2 more left hooks but Mayo goes on the charge. Didnt look hurt to me as he was going forward. Mayo was hurt 20 seconds before the bell and going into the the final seconds yes. I was not referring to the Tito fight but you brought it up. I was referring to Mayo doing this with most of his opponents. There is no way Sergio hits harder than Tito right? I would stand there and let Sergio get some free licks in and see for myself how soft his punches really are. :D Mayo had the balls to do it to strong hitters why not do it against a soft hitter? Eh? Who will be the first?

i think taylor would knock him out brutally within 5 rounds, and winky would make him look really bad and probably stop him late. eric regen (whoever that is) landed some straight right hands on mora, if that was taylor mora would still be sleeping. maybe he will surprise us though

I was 8 when I went to my first fight. I am a bit of an oldie. Watched all of Ali's most classic fights, strated watching Ali in 73. And you? How long have you been watching boxing? When I asked why bother covering up, I see it like this. I would stand there a la Mayorga against some one with no power and let them take their shots. You follow me now? I hope so. Well you posted that comment in reference to a Mora opponent and why they "cover up" if Mora is throwing punches. Well you cant win fights by eating punches no matter how much or how little power your opponent has. When Mayorga dropped his hands against TITO at the end of the 1st round he was already hurt.

If he fights some one like taylor i honestly think he will be killed. Yeah I think you're being a bit too harsh. The same Taylor that struggled dearly with Hopkins and recieved a lucky draw in a fight that Wright actually won.....will not beat Mora as easily as you think. I'm willing to actually put 1 billion points on Mora to win against Taylor if you want that bet. Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

How long have you been watching boxing ? :D I was 8 when I went to my first fight. I am a bit of an oldie. Watched all of Ali's most classic fights, strated watching Ali in 73. And you? How long have you been watching boxing? When I asked why bother covering up, I see it like this. I would stand there a la Mayorga against some one with no power and let them take their shots. You follow me now? I hope so.

If you ask me? I think Winky would give Sergio more of a challenge than Taylor. I don't even think Taylor can knock Sergio out. Taylor has been getting more gift decisions than any one I know. That's just my opinion. Sergio is still green. He went from backyard boxing to winning a million dollars in a tournament with some decent opposition. The kid is still learning and as a student of the game he is getting better, smarter and more patient. I think he has a shot of upsetting some big names because people underestimate his power. The funny thing about this is that when ever he fights, people cover up like it was Tyson hitting them. If he has no power, why do people even bother to cover up? I dont get it. How long have you been watching boxing ? :D

I think that the worst thing sergio can do is challange winky because winky has that aquard style that is impossab;e to look good against. Plus he would destroy him anyways so He would would look terrible. That would absolutly destroy his reputation for being and as a result would probably ruin his career.

And further more, I have the Mora/Taylor amatuer fight vid. Yes, Taylor did win long by points but Sergio sucked back then and he still made it into the trials for the Olys. I know what people do as amatuers does not always reflect what one can do in the pro's. Take Cotto for example, Cotto went back and called out those people who he lost to as an amatuer and Cotto destroyed them. I am not comparing Cotto to Mora, I am just trying to add a scenario. Sergio is not the same fighter he was in the Olys trials. I think the sleeper in this division is Kelly 'The Ghost' Pavlik. keep an eye on that kid.

If you ask me? I think Winky would give Sergio more of a challenge than Taylor. I don't even think Taylor can knock Sergio out. Taylor has been getting more gift decisions than any one I know. That's just my opinion. Sergio is still green. He went from backyard boxing to winning a million dollars in a tournament with some decent opposition. The kid is still learning and as a student of the game he is getting better, smarter and more patient. I think he has a shot of upsetting some big names because people underestimate his power. The funny thing about this is that when ever he fights, people cover up like it was Tyson hitting them. If he has no power, why do people even bother to cover up? I dont get it. you dont win a fight by getting hit in the face.

If you ask me? I think Winky would give Sergio more of a challenge than Taylor. I don't even think Taylor can knock Sergio out. Taylor has been getting more gift decisions than any one I know. That's just my opinion. Sergio is still green. He went from backyard boxing to winning a million dollars in a tournament with some decent opposition. The kid is still learning and as a student of the game he is getting better, smarter and more patient. I think he has a shot of upsetting some big names because people underestimate his power. The funny thing about this is that when ever he fights, people cover up like it was Tyson hitting them. If he has no power, why do people even bother to cover up? I dont get it.

Introduction Boxing Record Archive (BoxRec.com) provides "Current" and "All-Time" boxer ratings. The "Current" ratings include only boxers who have been "active" (had a bout) within the past 365 days, or have a bout scheduled. Every active boxer in the database is rated--even those with an 0-1 record. (After one year, an active boxer automatically is designated "inactive" by the BoxRec computer.) The "All-Time" ratings include both "active" and "inactive" (i.e., retired) boxers. The "Current" and "All-Time" ratings are wholly dependent upon the bouts contained in the database. They are not influenced by BoxRec's subjective views or by anyone else's opinions. A boxer may earn or lose ratings points with every bout he has; a boxer may also earn or lose points if bouts are added to any of his opponents' records, or to their opponents' records. The ratings are generated by the BoxRec computer, and are refreshed at approximately 9:35 GMT every day. There are inaccuracies (especially lower down the ratings) because of incomplete records. However the ratings are continually improving as new bouts are entered into the database. (Presently, 2,000 to 3,000 recent and older bouts are entered each week by the BoxRec Editors.) Although a particular boxer’s own record may be complete, his opponents’ records are not always complete. Pre-World War II boxers are at somewhat of a disadvantage, vis-à-vis modern boxers. Their opponents’ records often are extremely incomplete, while the records of opponents of more current boxers often are quite complete. So, for example, while the records of Mike Tyson’s opponents may be quite complete--thereby earning Tyson a certain number of points and giving him a high ranking among the All-Time Heavyweights--the records of Young Stribling’s opponents may be extremely lacking, thereby giving Stribling fewer points and a much-lower All-Time rating. In fact, it may appear to the casual BoxRec visitor that Stribling had fought many boxers making their professional debuts, or having only two or three total career bouts. It’s just that not all of his opponents’ bouts have been found or entered yet. As the BoxRec Editors continue to research older resources and enter “new” historical bouts into the database, the rating of an old-time boxer like Stribling will gradually move up or down, even if his own record is complete--if bouts are added to his opponents’ records, or to his opponents' opponents' records, and so forth. Further, because of the very few women presently boxing professionally, with some weight divisions having only a handful of active female boxers, a woman with an 0-1 record will appear “world ranked” by BoxRec. This is simply an anomaly due to the few female entries in the database. Ratings structure The current ratings consist of a basic rating a launching point system for not established boxers, not yet rated All these ratings evaluate every day all bouts in the database in chronological sequence. All parameter values are optimized to get best prediction quote of bout results in BoxRec database. So these ratings are optimized performance ratings. A higher rated boxer should be expected to defeat a lower rated boxer with increasing probability by increasing rating difference. Current rating The published current rating for established boxers is their basic rating For not established boxers their launch points are published for reference Launch points are 16 steps from 0 to 15 points So everybody can clearly distinguish between established and not established boxers Basic rating Every boxer gets a first rating of 1,000 before his first bout. After every bout the rating of the two boxers involved is changed depending on the bout's official result (KO, TKO, RTD, UD, PTS, NWS, MD, SD, DQ, D). TD is not regarded. All bouts are regarded to have the same weight independent of titles. The winner gets a basic gain / the loser a basic loss of points depending on the type of result. This gain / loss is corrected by some amount depending on the difference between the ratings of the opponents before the bout. If the winner was rated higher than his opponent before the bout, his gain will be decreased. If his rating was lower, his gain will be increased. The loser's loss is handled in the same way. A boxer is regarded to have an home advantage, if he has already fought a minimum of two bouts in the country where the current bout is taking place. For Unanimous Decisions, Win on Points, Majority Decisions, and Split Decisions, the gain/loss will be calculated directly from the judges' scores, if available. For a second and further win against a winless opponent, the boxer will only be rewarded 1 point. The rating is reduced in proportion to a product of average rating difference to opponents, consequent number of no-losses and average bouts per period The point gain is reduced to 50% if the performance for the current bout is smaller than for the bout before. For TKO, KO and RTD the winner is rewarded 6 addtional points for a 1st round win, 5 for a 2nd round win, ... and 1 point for a 6th round win. A winner's rating will not decrease, if the result was KO, TKO, RTD or DQ. The loser's will not increase in this case. The ratings are decreased for moving up to higher weight divisions by some factor - and they are increased by some smaller factor for moving down the divisions. This factor depends on the the weight limits of the divisions. All ratings are decreased by a small factor on a daily basis. Parameter values Home advantage = 125 TKO = 85 RTD = 85 KO = 80 UD = 80 PTS = 60 NWS = 60 MD = 50 SD = 50 DQ = 50 D = 0 SCORES for UD, PTS, MD, SD: 20 * mean score difference per judge; maximum 90 R_DIFF = correction for rating difference of opponents: 13.8 percent DECAY = continuous rating decay of 8.7 percent/year on a daily basis WEIGHT_UP: r_up = r*(weight_div/weight_div_up)**0.3 WEIGHT_DOWN: r_down = r*(weight_div/weight_div_down)**0.15 Formula If a boxer with a rating of r_a before the fight defeats a boxer b with a rating of r_b before the fight with result RES the new ratings r_a_new and r_b_new after a fight are: r_a_new = r_a + RES + (r_b - r_a)*R_DIFF r_b_new = r_b - RES + (r_a - r_b)*R_DIFF Launch point system Every boxer starts with 0 launch points before his first bout - this is grade 0. A boxer gets 1 point for defeating an opponent of grade 0 to 2, this ends at a maximum of 3 points. A boxer achieves grade 4 for defeating an opponent of grade 3 to 5. A boxer then gets another point for defeating an opponent of grade 3 to 5, this ends at a maximum of 6 points. A boxer achieves grade 7 for defeating an opponent of grade 6 to 8. A boxer then gets another point for defeating an opponent of grade 6 to 8, this ends at a maximum of 9 points. A boxer achieves grade 10 for defeating an opponent of grade 9 to 11. A boxer then gets another point for defeating an opponent of grade 9 to 11, this ends at a maximum of 12 points. A boxer achieves grade 13 for defeating an opponent of grade 12 to 14. A boxer then gets another point for defeating an opponent of grade 12 to 14, this ends at a maximum of 15 points. A boxer is launched and regarded as established and then has a regular rating, as soon as he defeated a boxer of grade 15 or an established boxer. The loser is set back by 1 grade, if he loses to a boxer of lower grade. An established boxer losing to a not established boxer is set back to grade 15 - he is unlaunched. If the winner then has less launch points than his defeated opponent, his launch points will be set to his opponent's + 1 All time ratings The all time ratings show the average of the best 5 annual ratings.

really? you agree that jimmy bivins should be ranked higher than jack dempsey? you agree that tony shucco belongs in the top 20 HWs of all time? you think that joey archer has done more in his career to be ranked higher than jake lamotta? please tell me ur joking. .............................................................. yes indeed I am :p

the Current rankings sucks balls. The all time rankings are finally right though. really? you agree that jimmy bivins should be ranked higher than jack dempsey? you agree that tony shucco belongs in the top 20 HWs of all time? you think that joey archer has done more in his career to be ranked higher than jake lamotta? please tell me ur joking.

for the love of god, no it does not. have you seen their rankings? i dont even need to give some examples are continue to rant to explain how flawed boxrec's rankings are. the Current rankings sucks balls. The all time rankings are finally right though.

yes it does. for the love of god, no it does not. have you seen their rankings? i dont even need to give some examples are continue to rant to explain how flawed boxrec's rankings are.

okay but how about answering my questions lol. naaaaaa. lol. i doubt he can stay undefeated for much longer. not even another fight IMO. cause it looks like he may get quartey next for some reason, and he will get his ass kicked. But if he fights another bum-yack, then he may stay undefeated for a little longer. But he better take some big names while he has the chance, to get more money. cause the longer he keeps fighting no-names, the better his chances of losing are. and when he loses to a no-name (if he does) then those big name fights are gonna fly away :(

Taylor will do Sergio like he did Daniel Edouard.

okay but how about answering my questions lol. Sergio doesn't have the power to really go up against Taylor, Miranda, Wright, Soliman, Abraham, etc.

okay but how about answering my questions lol.

BoxRec means nothing. yes it does.