I think it is indeed a funny sight to see articles from " Top " sports writers, jazzing on people who keep score at home. Claiming that " EVERYONE" at ringside had it as a close bout, while - I am sure they would say this is they could - us "nobodies" at home had a much differn't score. I think the fact of this is, the people judging at home have the advantage. It amazing to me how much the crowd can influence a judge desicion , while at home with it muted, and usually always no destractions, and a great view of the ring, you can easily see who is scoring and winning the fight. I personally think these experts and judges are lame, and don't have a clue as the what is going on most of the time. Yes indeed they get the easy stuff rgith, but , I feel more often than not, they are wrong on most of the very close desicions, that are still fairly easy to see who won the fight. just my 2 cents =D