So, which has better fighters representing there belts WBC, WBA, IBF, or WBO.

Also which fighter is the best out of each divison. Please dont post unless its about this thread. I honestly want to find out every posters opinion. So please no hijacking this time. First fighter is the wbc, next is wba, and so on 1.WBC 2.WBA 3.IBF 4.WBO Heavy Hasim Rahman Nikolay Valuev Wladimir Klitschko Sergei Liakhovich Cruiser O'Neil Bell O'Neil Bell Vacant Johnny Nelson Light heavy Tomasz Adamek Fabrice Tiozzo Clinton Woods Zsolt Erdei Super middle Markus Beyer Mikkel Kessler Joe Calzaghe Joe Calzaghe Middle Jermain Taylor Felix Sturm Arthur Abraham Jermain Taylor Light middle Oscar De La Hoya Jose Rivera Cory Spinks Sergeii Dzinziruk Welter Carlos Baldomir Ricky Hatton Vacant Antonio Margarito Light welter Vacant Vacant Juan Urango Miguel Cotto Light Diego Corrales Juan Diaz Jesus Chavez Acelino Freitas Super feather Marco Antonio Barrera Vincente Mosquera Cassius Baloyi Jorge Barrios Feather Takashi Koshimoto Chris John Eric Aiken Scott Harrison Super bantam Israel Vazquez Somsak Sithchatchawa Vacant Daniel Ponce De Leon Bantam Hozumi Hasagawa Wladimir Sidorenko Rafael Marquez Johnny Gonzalez Super fly Masamori Tokuyama Martin Castillo Luis Alberto Perez Fernando Montiel Fly Pongsaklek Wonjongkam Lorenzo Parra Vic Darchinian Omar Navaez Light fly Brian Viloria Roberto Vazquez Ulises Solis Hugo Cararez Straw Eagle Kyowa Yukata Niida Muhammad Rachman Ivan Calderon

Comments (12)

Tha_Greatest6475

oh that i definitely agree with man, no doubt. But to get rid of belts all together would be foolish. Ya, I always wanted just one world title in each division too, so that at any given time, you could only have 17 active World Champions. Id say keep the WBC belt, since it has the most history and looks the best, and dump the rest. Nice. I say... Dump all 4 of them. Keep the Ring Magazine belt since most of their rankings are acurate too. WBC is way to messed up today, man. Keep stripping everyone and have terrible rankings.

19y ago

VanesBoxing

Bro, I know what you mean. It does look nice to have a bunch of belts when you're walking in the ring but.... There's WAY too many belts out there. There should be one belt IMO. There should be one champion, it just doesn't make sence to have a bunch of champions. It was way better in the olden days when there was just one champion. oh that i definitely agree with man, no doubt. But to get rid of belts all together would be foolish. Ya, I always wanted just one world title in each division too, so that at any given time, you could only have 17 active World Champions. Id say keep the WBC belt, since it has the most history and looks the best, and dump the rest.

19y ago

Tha_Greatest6475

but they do man, and it adds a little spice and flavor to boxing. How plain do fighters look when they walk in the ring empty handed, compared to Mayweather coming in with like 5 guys behind him holding his belts up high. Its great for show purposes man, and of course its hard earned hardware for the fighters. Did you know when you win a belt, you get 2 of them, one to keep forever, and another to carry in the ring with you and possibly lose it to your opponent. Well im not sure if all the belts are like this, but i know a few are. Bro, I know what you mean. It does look nice to have a bunch of belts when you're walking in the ring but.... There's WAY too many belts out there. There should be one belt IMO. There should be one champion, it just doesn't make sence to have a bunch of champions. It was way better in the olden days when there was just one champion.

19y ago

VanesBoxing

Can you guys please act like these belts don't exist? but they do man, and it adds a little spice and flavor to boxing. How plain do fighters look when they walk in the ring empty handed, compared to Mayweather coming in with like 5 guys behind him holding his belts up high. Its great for show purposes man, and of course its hard earned hardware for the fighters. Did you know when you win a belt, you get 2 of them, one to keep forever, and another to carry in the ring with you and possibly lose it to your opponent. Well im not sure if all the belts are like this, but i know a few are.

19y ago

Tha_Greatest6475

Can you guys please act like these belts don't exist?

19y ago

VanesBoxing

Mostly WBO.....suckiest belt but has the better fighters. ya, aesthetically speaking (the looks of the belts) these are my choices: 1) WBC (green) 2) IBF (Red) 3) WBO (purple-ish) 4) WBA (black)

19y ago

VanesBoxing

my order: 1 tie WBC, WBO 2 IBF 3 WBA

19y ago

Sttuddahboy619

I like WBO,but WBC is pretty close.

19y ago

DiegoFuego

But of the real titles, it's WBC by a mile

19y ago

DiegoFuego

WBC and it's not even close to me. Jermain Taylor, Diego Corrales, and Marco Antonio Barrera alone win this thing. my mistake, WBO wins because they also have Taylor + Calzaghe + Barrios + Freitas already

19y ago

RastaSmoker

i tend to like the WBC

19y ago

RastaSmoker

i just realized that there was another thread similar to mine, but mines better so come here to chat lol

19y ago