the fight was scored 114-111 by all judges. had peter not KDd wlad 3 times, it wouldve been 117-111, 9 rounds for wlad and 3 for peter.
despite the KDs, wlad used his jab, size, reach, and power to keep peter at bay for most of the entire fight. peter ate jab after jab after jab and was even wobbled by a jab. with a head made of granite, sam peter managed to stay on his feet the entire fight, losing a 12 round decision.
the question is: did wlad dominate the fight (even though he was KDd three times)?
IMO, he did. aside from the KDs, peter didnt score a single round without a KD. all he did was eat punches, get clinched and throw wild swinging punches and landed very few. even the first and second KDs were rather questionable, but the third was 100% legit. wlad statistically and physically dominated the smaller and slower peter.
Please explain, you are wrong.
Klitschko never tried to avenge a loss (Puritty, Sanders, Brewster) and he refused to rematch DaVarryl Williamson although the outcome of the fight was highly controversial.
from what I heard it was the other way around. at least with sanders and brewster. not sure about purrity
How can someone even type a bullisht question like that?? The man was scared to death, held all night, and still almost got ktfo'd.
he did all that and won the fight. amazing,,lol
Please explain, you are wrong.
Klitschko never tried to avenge a loss (Puritty, Sanders, Brewster) and he refused to rematch DaVarryl Williamson although the outcome of the fight was highly controversial.
everyone knows sanders moved onto vitali for a bigger payday
brewster didnt want the klitschko fight, not the other way around, wlad has stated that he will fight lamon as soon as he sees a contract. its lamon who wouldnt give wlad a rematch at the time saying " he has to earn it" and whatever other lame ass bullshit king made him say.
as for williamson, the outcome was not nearly as controversial as you make it out to be, he dominted every second of the fight beside the flash KD. his refusal to fight him was much more a decision of principle than anything else. he had already beaten williamson and despite the fact TOS was moved ahead of him in the rankings, from wlads point of view he shouldnt have to beat a guy twice to earn a higher ranking, and by doing so he would just be playing into the hands of a governing body that was clearly being influenced by outside forces.
Do you honestly think if he were ordered to fight any one of those guys that he would not take the fight and give up his belt? i find that very very hard to believe.
Sorry you got that impression, that was not my intention. But it is just what I thought - had Klitschko not been afraid of Brewster for instance, why did he choose the Byrd fight?
statements like this just reveal thay you have no intention of intelligent debate and are just looking to piss people off.
Please explain, you are wrong.
Klitschko never tried to avenge a loss (Puritty, Sanders, Brewster) and he refused to rematch DaVarryl Williamson although the outcome of the fight was highly controversial.
Face it: Klitschko is scared of Puritty, Brewster, Williamson, Sanders and Peter. .
statements like this just reveal thay you have no intention of intelligent debate and are just looking to piss people off.
How can someone even type a bullisht question like that?? The man was scared to death, held all night, and still almost got ktfo'd.
I would not express my view like you did, but you have got a point.
watched it again and they didnt show any punch stats, and neither realy lands much clean legal blows.
watching it again i think you could call it a 10-10 ore a 10-9 for peter, but no way you could call it a 10-7, those kds were bullshit real.
and bringin insults into this is just plain lame.
You have NO IDEA what you're talking about, and have moved from being bitter and uninformed to just plain ignorant.
This post is beyond laughable.
My scores were:
Round 01 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 02 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 03 - Klitschko 09 : 10 Peter
Round 04 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 05 - Klitschko 07 : 10 Peter
Round 06 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 07 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 08 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 09 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 10 - Klitschko 08 : 10 Peter (could be 7:10 because the bell clearly saved him)
Round 11 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
Round 12 - Klitschko 10 : 09 Peter
114 : 111 or 113 : 111
Did Wladimir Klitschko win the boxing match? YES.
Did Wladimir Klitschko win the fight? NO.
Did Wladimir Klitschko dominate? HELL NO.
Should there be a rematch? I think so.
Would Klitschko win again? I don't think so because he either would not be allowed to hold that much (which he clearly needs to not get stopped) or Peter manages to make necessary adjustments. Face it: Klitschko is scared of Puritty, Brewster, Williamson, Sanders and Peter. He looks great against small and weak opposition only.
I think you are drunk... and no Wlad did'nt win 11 rounds in that fight. I understand you are a fan but please quit the biased bullshit.
80% On HBO's website voted there should be a rematch
scoring it 11-1 is far less biased than counting rabbitpunching kds.
watching it again id say you can give 10-9 to peter ore 10-10.
LOL!
You're suggesting WLad won the 5th round?
Not just that the knock downs shouldn't have counted (which is incorrect and laughable) but that Wlad should have won the 5th round?
WOW.
Please, stop. You're embarassing the history of your family.
watched it again and they didnt show any punch stats, and neither realy lands much clean legal blows.
watching it again i think you could call it a 10-10 ore a 10-9 for peter, but no way you could call it a 10-7, those kds were bullshit real.
and bringin insults into this is just plain lame.
hes embarrasing the history of his family, your house is worth more than my family (whatever that means).
there are two retarded ass quotes from you in this thread alone.
you repeat the same dipshit post over and over for going on 8 pages, you havent said anything new, and are relying on insulting peoples personal lives cause they dont agree with your juvenile analysis. you accuse other people of "trolling" ten times a day yet this thread is at least the second one this week in which you jumped in and went right into attacking everyone in the thread who doesent agree with you.
youre officially going on my block list, so save your stupid ass responses for people who will read them from now on.
youre a grade-A loser, in a perfect world you would live next door and id come over and kick your ass to the curb.
thanks for the bad karma bitch, i know im doing alright if the biggest dipshit in the history of boxing forums doesent like my posting.
Once again you are upset by my (on topic) comments, cannot refute anything, so you spend a great deal of time and effort saying absolutely nothing.
Why do you even bother typing?
Please, stop. You're embarassing the history of your family.
hes embarrasing the history of his family, your house is worth more than my family (whatever that means).
there are two retarded ass quotes from you in this thread alone.
you repeat the same dipshit post over and over for going on 8 pages, you havent said anything new, and are relying on insulting peoples personal lives cause they dont agree with your juvenile analysis. you accuse other people of "trolling" ten times a day yet this thread is at least the second one this week in which you jumped in and went right into attacking everyone in the thread who doesent agree with you.
youre officially going on my block list, so save your stupid ass responses for people who will read them from now on.
youre a grade-A loser, in a perfect world you would live next door and id come over and kick your ass to the curb.
thanks for the bad karma bitch, i know im doing alright if the biggest dipshit in the history of boxing forums doesent like my posting.
wlad won 11 of the 12 (in reality counting a real kd as a real kd)
LOL!
You're suggesting WLad won the 5th round?
Not just that the knock downs shouldn't have counted (which is incorrect and laughable) but that Wlad should have won the 5th round?
WOW.
Please, stop. You're embarassing the history of your family.
You still dont get the point do you?
Both are illegal and does'nt matter which one is dangerous, both of those should'nt happen because its not fair.
I never mentioned that holding was worse, and can you tell me who thinks holding is okay? I get it that Wlad is gay and likes to hug the fighters for pleasure but thats a different story it should be illegal for leaning on a 6'1 Samuel Peter because your tired specially when your a 6'6 250 pounds guy.
Yes a rematch should happen, only a moron would think a rematch should'nt happen, Peter knocked him down 3 times and hurt him too, if you dont count the knockdowns legit you might as well cut some points of Klitschko for holding and then holding + hitting.
See what I quoted again and see what you replied too.
wlad won 11 of the 12 (in reality counting a real kd as a real kd)
and you think there should be a rematch :rolleyes:
peter aint in peters legue, besides wlad should fight liakovich,rahman and remacth brewster.
obiusly many refs thin its okay, lewis didnt get much trouble for it neither did ali ore ruiz.
agree is would have been the best if neither the holding ore rabbitpunching happened.
Does'nt matter, both of them are illegal, and wlad did hold thats why Peter's Knockdowns should be counted legit, if he did'nt hold that much in that fight and peter still rabit punched, i would have counted those 2 knockdowns not legit, but when both guys are at fault, you cant just look at one and say "Hey that was illegal" and blah blah blah...
A rematch should happen to clear the controversy.
lol
rabbitpunching is fare worse than holding, many thinks holding is okay, who thinks rabbitpunching is.
and why do they need a remact there is no doubt who the winner was, with ore without the kds being counted
legit or not it really doesnt matter. wlad had peter hurt badly in the last round and won the fight. the people who dont like him just need to get over it and move on. maybe next fight you'll get your wish,,lol. lets just hope we see some good fights coming up
The only ones who need to move on are the nut huggers who can't get past mild critisisms or plain facts without ranting and raving.
How many posts are there complaining about the 1st two knock downs?
Of course he deserved the win, but he did not dominate (that's silly) and he WAS knocked down THREE times.
It's unreal how many people can't get over that.
Needless to say it was a retaliation for Klitschko's holding strategy, punching in the back of head is illegal, yet holding constantly is legal. :rolleyes:
thats true, but is it equally illegal, holding is almost execpted in pro boxing rabbitpunching is not