I guess the WBC, although I suppose it varies depending on who is the champion in each weight class and what they have done to earn that championship, but overall I pay more attention to the Ring magazine belt.
Be nice to see just one belt for a change. Probably won't happen in my lifetime though. Ring rankings are a far better judge of a fighters ability than the rest put together. IBF should be for up and comers, no pay per view lets see those on ESPN.
these belts look all plasticy and cheap and tacky. i dont like the look of em. they really need to get them updated and re-designed/re-vamped.
I like the WBC belt coz it sounds the best :D
"soon people will realise that it is the fighter that makes the belt, not the belt that makes the fighter" - Big George.
I think some people need to recognizzzzze.
lol.
An arguement over a fucking strap with a shiny metal plate in the center of it.
I voted for the IBF because it's the worst belt possible.
That's the only reason I see why anyone would pick the IBF.
lol.
An arguement over a fucking strap with a shiny metal plate in the center of it.
I voted for the IBF because it's the worst belt possible.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
LMAO IBF = worst ever
7. Clinton Woods (38-3-1)
Although he is supposed to defend his belt against mandatory challenger Johnson, who actually deserves the title shot, the disgraceful and warped IBF is incapable of simply doing the right thing. Rather than immediately mandate the Johnson fight, the repugnant organization is considering approving an interim defense first. That wouldn't be so horrific if it were against someone other than Jason DeLisle, an opponent who is vomit-inducing for two reasons: 1. DeLisle is coming off a loss in his last fight, an IBF eliminator against Julio Gonzalez! Doesn't losing an "elimination" bout "eliminate" you from next fighting for that organization's title? 2. Woods already knocked DeLisle out in an October 2004 IBF elimination bout.
2. Glen Johnson (44-10-2)
As the mandatory challenger for titlist Clinton Woods, Johnson is entitled to the next shot, and if the deplorable IBF ever orders the fight, Johnson will be the big favorite. He already owns a win against Woods, not to mention a draw that most observers think he really won.
Next: TBA
Dan Rafael agrees that the IBF is the most detestable of all organizations. Check his rankings on ESPN.com
1. O'Neil Bell (26-1-1)
The detestable IBF took one of his title belts because he is injured and unable to fight mandatory challenger Steve Cunningham on May 6 as planned, just another scummy move in an ever-growing list of scummy moves by the foul organization. But at this point, who really gives a damn about the nauseating IBF? In this era of dirty sanctioning bodies, the IBF has actually separated itself from the pack as the most wretched of all, and when you have the WBC around, that's saying a lot.
Anyone know what the sanctioning fee's are for the different belts? Are the fee's dependent on weight class? Are the fees a percentage of purse or are they flat fees?
thats just plain ugly and looks childish, like some kind of pinata material. Ring may be credible, but you cant compare that belt with the professional look of the rest.
Hitman - rocky should fight for the OAG belt - Old Ass Geezer :D
I like it. It looks old school and powerful. IMO a belt doesn't have to look like it belongs on a wrestler to look good. Oh, Rocky had a Ring belt. Maybe the producers thought that it was the best belt too.
http://www.boxnews.com.ua/photos/241/bernard-hopkins2.jpg
The one on his shoulder.
thats just plain ugly and looks childish, like some kind of pinata material. Ring may be credible, but you cant compare that belt with the professional look of the rest.
Hitman - rocky should fight for the OAG belt - Old Ass Geezer :D