LOL! This is some funny shit!
Byrd ordered to be quiet!
Universum Box-Promotion has arranged through a regional court in Berlin a court order for IBF heavyweight champion Chris Byrd to stop claiming that Wladimir Klitschko had a chemical substance on his gloves in their October 2000 fight. Byrd and Klitschko, who meet again this weekend, previously fought for the WBO title nearly six years ago with Klitschko winning a lopsided decision by scores of 120-106, 119-107, 118-108, knocking down Byrd twice in the process. Byrd has maintained since 1993 and again this weekend that there was a substance on Klitschko's gloves that made his face swell up, an allegation that is vehemently denied by Universum, Klitschko's promoter at the time.
Tuesday, April 18 2006
Sorry about that! I was happy just to have a pic of the rock. I don't know what's with those gloves either.
Those are most likely sparring gloves, the ones he has on in his fights are actually smaller than the ones they use today.
finaly you show your racist side good for you.
no more hiding in the closet.
byrd is gonna win sat. your the one who's gonna eat it. humble pie that is.
...Byrd's cashing in his chips Saturday with one last big payday. Wlad will be the Heavyweight champion of the world and ring magazine champion as well. He will be the undisputed king of the division. I just wanna see everyone's heavyweight rankings on this board after the fight.
First off....You're a dork.
"Anything Klitschko"? I've never once been a fan of Vitali. You're angry because your featherfisted boyfriend is going to get his ass reamed on saturday:
And a whiteboy is taking his title. Eat it.
finaly you show your racist side good for you.
no more hiding in the closet.
byrd is gonna win sat. your the one who's gonna eat it. humble pie that is.
I find it amusing that Wlad and his camp can go on and on about Vasaline on his legs, poisioned water bottles etc for the Brewster fight,
but go to court to silence Byrd.
:rolleyes:
lol,,,,,I love how you dont find the byrd comment amusing tho
I find it amusing that Wlad and his camp can go on and on about Vasaline on his legs, poisioned water bottles etc for the Brewster fight,
but go to court to silence Byrd.
:rolleyes:
1. Because this wasn't really a popular fight at all and any huge bet in favour of any of these guys would raise or lower the odds.
2. Not true.
3. Because he was involved in a fight where he was extremely active...and got KNOCKED THE FUCK OUT!
4. They didn't.....
All in all, W.Klit will still KO this pussy!!
lol.
First off....you're confusing "blood sugar" with "blood pressure".
Secondly....would you care to elaborate as to why #2 and #4 respectively were false?
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
LOL! This is some funny shit!
Byrd ordered to be quiet!
Universum Box-Promotion has arranged through a regional court in Berlin a court order for IBF heavyweight champion Chris Byrd to stop claiming that Wladimir Klitschko had a chemical substance on his gloves in their October 2000 fight. Byrd and Klitschko, who meet again this weekend, previously fought for the WBO title nearly six years ago with Klitschko winning a lopsided decision by scores of 120-106, 119-107, 118-108, knocking down Byrd twice in the process. Byrd has maintained since 1993 and again this weekend that there was a substance on Klitschko's gloves that made his face swell up, an allegation that is vehemently denied by Universum, Klitschko's promoter at the time.
Tuesday, April 18 2006
this proves that byrd doesnt deserve to be champion. real champions dont complain over a one sided ass whooping they suffered over 6 years ago.
byrd is a bitch.
This is NSB, we gotta behave and talk facts, not I'm a short Filipino.
*Christopher Walken's Voice*
I love this guy!
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
How retarded could one person actually be?
Did you miss the part where I stated there was a possibility that foul play may have been an issue?
Big difference, you don't understand because once again:
You're keep believing what you'd like to read.
If there was a POSSIBILTY but no conclusive evidence, why bring it into play? We have to use FACTS, not THEORIES when we discuss boxing intelligently. What does a possibility have to do with the actual outcome of this fight? When you state that foul play is a possible factor irresponsibly, you are implying that somehow Brewster's victory in 2004 was tainted and should not be appreciated as a legitimate TKO victory for "Relentless" Lamon Brewster. What ever happened to you leaving the conversation?
I heard JFK was killed by the CIA too.....anybody else hear that ;-)
well only true retards believe the lee harvey oswald story, there is a reason jack ruby shot him, it was his job to do it
You're overusing cliches, because like I just stated....you're pointless. You're angry that your short, and that's a personal problem that you more than likely shouldn't be spiteful about.
This is further proof that RWK doesn't know his shit. Its either someone rubbed vaseline on his nipples, put sweet n low in his water bottle, or that I am short. Not that Wladimir gut the wall and then Brewster hit his chin. C'mon man, if this was the Thunderdome you'd have POINT A, POINT B, POINT C and the such. This is NSB, we gotta behave and talk facts, not I'm a short Filipino.
When you make remarks that Brewster's camp had committed some impropriety prior to the 2004 WBO title fight, you imply that Brewster's win is tainted.
How retarded could one person actually be?
Did you miss the part where I stated there was a possibility that foul play may have been an issue?
Big difference, you don't understand because once again:
You're keep believing what you'd like to read.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
Questions.
1. Why did the odds drop pre fight from 11:1 to 4:1?
2. Why did security have to remove someone from Brewsters camp that was caught sneaking into the dressing room?
3. Why did Wladimir have an abnormally high blood sugar level after the fight? Doctors verified this exact occurence.
4. Why did the blood tests mysteriously dissapear from the lab?
Should I go on?
I heard JFK was killed by the CIA too.....anybody else hear that ;-)
How does this not bolster my argument? The same is true in the Brewster fight.
My statement wasn't meant to bolster either you or RWK's argument but merely state my opinion on the matter. I'm not suggesting I didn't agree with your comments more... but the "debate" in which you 2 are engaged in is pointless bickering.