Video: Mo Harris Knocks out Sergi Lyakovich

There was a game of football (soccer) a couple of weeks ago where a Liverpool player took a kick in the face and had the same injury. He had to go off on a stretcher and they thought he would lose his sight. It's a bad injury, put it that way. Brewster hardly looked like this was hindering him last week....

the only problem i have here is that the same people who said that the wladimir was drugged and that sergio was sick, say that lamon brewsters detached retina is just an excuse. Wladimir ran out of staminia, however there is a conspiracy theory that he was drugged, however it was not proved so it's obvious that the staminia problem cost him the fight. However, this is not an excuse at all, drugging would have been but they dropped the allegations. Sergei was sick before one of his loses, he had the flu, and to make it worse had a bad reaction to a b-12 vitamin shot. Lamon Brewster was hurt during the fight, not before, so its not an excuse, he was inflicted the damage by a punch, nothing illegal, so you can't say I coulden't see thats why I lost, when you took a flush shot to the face. My only conflict with his statements is that he said he was blind the entire fight, which I believe is false, he could have had a bit of vision problems initially, maybe temporary partial blinding, but he was not blind the entire fight, thats a lie. The WebMD facts proved it. If it was severe he could have been completely blind, but as we saw it was nothing that surgery coulden't fix.

the only problem i have here is that the same people who said that the wladimir was drugged and that sergio was sick, say that lamon brewsters detached retina is just an excuse.

Blurred vision doesn't necessairly make someone squint or rub there eyes. If your vision becomes blurry, what do you do? Jab your eye with a rusty nail? Or just walk around ignoring it, refusing to rub your eye or squint?

lmao. figured all you could do was bring up the ole "nuthugging line". your a joke and everyone on here knows it. why you continue to make yourself the laughing stock by posting on here is beyond me. get over it The only joke is you and how easilly upset you are. You and your fellow cheerleaders are an ongoing comedy group around these parts.

Blurred vision doesn't necessairly make someone squint or rub there eyes. I've already said several times I don't think it would have made a difference, but I get a kick out of Nut Hugging stooges like you jumping all over this when there was bi weekly "Wlad was drugged" threads after his loss to Brewster. There's so much irony and humor in your complaining, you should look at entering a comedy circut. lmao. figured all you could do was bring up the ole "nuthugging line". your a joke and everyone on here knows it. why you continue to make yourself the laughing stock by posting on here is beyond me. get over it

Just like you've moved on from this Lyakovich fight that you posted at the start of the thread then. The tread was hijacked by the collective hurt feelings of a bunch of sore cheer leaders. It was expected. :hijacked:

look lame brain. when you cant see properly out of an eye your natural reaction is to squint, blink and or rub it. I watched that fight again and there was no indication whatsoever of vision problems. that plus him not even mentioning it till a week later make it obvious there using it as an excuse. its called common sense but a "bozo" like yourself only sees things one way Blurred vision doesn't necessairly make someone squint or rub there eyes. I've already said several times I don't think it would have made a difference, but I get a kick out of Nut Hugging stooges like you jumping all over this when there was bi weekly "Wlad was drugged" threads after his loss to Brewster. There's so much irony and humor in your complaining, you should look at entering a comedy circut.

Calling me a Brewster nut hugger for calling a bunch of you freaks out on your bitching is quite funny. I could care less for Brewster, and said he would have lost with or without it. It's bitches like you who discount what he's said when you have no idea when or what was deterring his vision that are a joke. look lame brain. when you cant see properly out of an eye your natural reaction is to squint, blink and or rub it. I watched that fight again and there was no indication whatsoever of vision problems. that plus him not even mentioning it till a week later make it obvious there using it as an excuse. its called common sense but a "bozo" like yourself only sees things one way

lol, you're just angry because you hug the nuts of some shitty fighters. I have nothing agaisnt Eastern Euro fighters. Some of your nut hugging friends like to play the race card because I think the Klitschkos are all hype and Maskaev sucks. That's 3 fighters. You just don't like this thread because you're at the far opposit extreme. You can't deal with anything negative about fighters you hug the nuts of. This was not seen by a lot of people, and when I saw it I thought I'd post it here. You're sore because it upsets you. Grow up. Can I ask you why you constantly assume to know what people are thinking?

Me posting this clip was no more a coincidence than you needing to make an excuse about it with your 1st clip. It's an applicable topic right now. Sergi looked good agaisnt Brewster, but this is shown as a reminder to keep things real and in context. I didn't see you ever post a video of Wlad knocking down Brewster as a reminder to keep things real and in context :rolleyes:

Deal with it and move on. Just like you've moved on from this Lyakovich fight that you posted at the start of the thread then.

....Interesting clip. The count was definitely fast but Sergei seemed to be done at that point.

I caught on to Bozo's game after posting with him once. I don't really care about bias, we all are to varying degrees and the partisan element is what makes sports so addictive, but with Bozo it's the intellectual pigheadedness that gets me. I've been reading on these boards for getting on for a year now and he very rarely allows himself to learn from others well-reasoned opinions, and god forbid, change his mind. It's a shame, cos you only really learn from listening to others.

This is quite ironic coming from you, who's never been able to back up anything he's ever said that I know of. You look at Sergi's record, and this loss is the one question mark that immediatly shoots out. Most people (the majority being clowns that have cried about it in here) are crying without having seen it. It's an interesting clip for those who haven't seen it. You guys just can't deal with seeing a fighter you like critisized. You bitch and complain like teen girls cheering for someone on American Idol. I really enjoy how you bitches paint me to be a Brewster nut hugger because I posted this clip. Take a look: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36334 I didn't see you girls crying when I made that thread. It's pathetic how biased, blineded and delusional some of you are. Kudos to Bozo for this one!! I usually get annoyed by your calling evryone a 'nuthugger' but you did post the same thread about Brewster. At least you were fair. One difference however is that people did get overexcited about Brewster and called him the savior of the division. That has yet to happen with SL, and if sanity prevails it vever will. For the record I had Brewster rated as #1 HW before this fight, based on recent performances. But it should have been obvious that he is capable of losing to fringe contenders because he is almost always behind on the cards.

Of course, man. Most people here see through Bozo's extremely transparent agenda. All he did after Calzaghe beat Lacy was find ways to criticize him. The entire purpose of this thread was to undermine Sergei's win and deflate him. Very, very simple. I'd be very surprised if there's anybody on this board who has been here for awhile that hasn't caught onto Bozo's game by now. This is quite ironic coming from you, who's never been able to back up anything he's ever said that I know of. You look at Sergi's record, and this loss is the one question mark that immediatly shoots out. Most people (the majority being clowns that have cried about it in here) are crying without having seen it. It's an interesting clip for those who haven't seen it. You guys just can't deal with seeing a fighter you like critisized. You bitch and complain like teen girls cheering for someone on American Idol. I really enjoy how you bitches paint me to be a Brewster nut hugger because I posted this clip. Take a look: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36334 I didn't see you girls crying when I made that thread. It's pathetic how biased, blineded and delusional some of you are.

It's a valid REASON for a loss, cept that I read on Web MD that the way he described the condition during the fight seemed over exagerated. He could have possibly had blindless when the PUNCH that landed on him happened or possibly partial blindless from one eye, but he wasn't blind for the entire fight that is a lie. I want to see the rematch. A flu is a good EXCUSE because its documented before the fight + the reaction to the shot. You buy the excuse because in one case it's a fighter you like, and in another it's a fighter you don't and you're throwing doubt around. You guys are over the top with your biased cheerleading. Guys fight sick all the time. He got pounded and lost the fight. Deal with it and move on.

lol,,,,funny how there was never a post about brewsters embarrassing losses to shufford and entienne after his win over wlad to keep things "in context". your a brewster nuthugger and white fighter hater. its getting old Calling me a Brewster nut hugger for calling a bunch of you freaks out on your bitching is quite funny. I could care less for Brewster, and said he would have lost with or without it. It's bitches like you who discount what he's said when you have no idea when or what was deterring his vision that are a joke.

Like I'm always preaching, styles make fights. That's an overused cliche to some degree...but some posters have a hard time grasping that subject. Because A beat B and C beat A.......that means that C beats B. I'm not buying it. Totally agree.

Why didn't Brewster do that? I have the fucking answer.. HE DIDN'T FUCKING TRAIN HARD ENOUGH AND UNDERESTIMATED LIAKOVICH!