I say these two are the most debated decisions the last couple of years (yeah Casamayor has been screwed by not the calibre of these fighters).
IMO, it goes to DLH-Mosley II. I thought DLH dictated the fight's pace. Landed more punches and was more active in general. I don't see how anyone could have scored it for "two solid punches a round" Mosley.
Yeah JMM isn't much of a boxer either. See all those punches he took? Punchers don't flushly take that kind of abuse. Never seen Floyd hit like that and consistently.
there is no way you could of seen the second dlh mosely fight and called it for mosely even calling it a draw would of been crazy. pac couldnt box with jmm one good round followed by great boxing from jmm its a draw or bearly a win.
mosley beat dlh both times
jmm didnt deserve a draw against pacman
so pacman vs jmm was the worse decision of the two
there is no way you could of seen the second dlh mosely fight and called it for mosely even calling it a draw would of been crazy. pac couldnt box with jmm one good round followed by great boxing from jmm its a draw or bearly a win.
It's one thing for you to waste bandwidth, peoples time, and oxygen with your moronic dribble......but the racism and threats of physical injury are totally uncalled for.
Get your shit together before you get shit on.
...wtf are you talking about?
you should be banned for false accusations.
pac/JMM was close. you could probly make a legit arguement that it shouldve been a draw.
there is no arguement allowed when it is said that oscar shouldve been given the decision in the 2nd mosley fight.
Watch Alfredo Escalera vs Tyrone Everett if you wanna see the biggest robbery ever.Everett in my opinion won atleat 12 out of the 15 rounds and still lost.
The biggest robbery I actually ever saw was Lennox Lewis vs Evander I.
maybe, but that was fixed in the 2nd fight when Holy actually beat LL, and the fight was given to Lewis
Its funny how all the pinoys think that the worse decision was JMM-Pac, and the rest of us think that it was mosley-dlh.
The JMM/Pac fight was not that fvcked up. JMM outboxed Pac the most of the last 11rounds so no, JMM was not "Destroyed by pac".
how can you say that? look again on who voted who. there are pinoys who voted dlh-mosley nearly as much as those who voted pac-jmm. and btw, why are you even giving special mention to pinoys? how bout me saying mex nuthuggers or pac-haters who would vote at anything but pac? that could mean the same thing with this poll would it now :rolleyes:
Its funny how all the pinoys think that the worse decision was JMM-Pac, and the rest of us think that it was mosley-dlh.
The JMM/Pac fight was not that fvcked up. JMM outboxed Pac the most of the last 11rounds so no, JMM was not "Destroyed by pac".
The bottomline is there was a "PUBLIC ADMISSION" that the judge screwed up!How can it be worse than that?
Did the same thing happen in DLH-Mosley?In Casa-Corrales?In Taylor-Hopkins?No!People may have different perceptions on who won but the thing is, the judges stuck with their guns.They stood by their judgements.That however, was not the case with JMM-PAC.
Its funny how all the pinoys think that the worse decision was JMM-Pac, and the rest of us think that it was mosley-dlh.
The JMM/Pac fight was not that fvcked up. JMM outboxed Pac the most of the last 11rounds so no, JMM was not "Destroyed by pac".
Pacquiao destroyed Marquez? Did you watch that fight? I'm a Pacquiao fan, and I can't stand Juan Manuel or Rafael, but Marquez thoroughly outboxed Manny. I think Manny would win the rematch, but the decision could've easily gone to Marquez in their first meeting. If Pacman wouldn't have gotten in JM's ass in the first round, he would've lost that fight, hands down.
i agree with this. PAC-JMM is a close fight...DLH-MOSLEY is more questionable.
http://x402.putfile.com/3/5900320510.gif
Got it yet man? Heard it rocks, im sure it'll make you cry, its in stores now :D
I dont have a copy of the CD.But from what I know, the album just reached Gold status, and still selling like hot pancakes! ;P
hum, i thought they where both good decisions. JMM showed great heart and skill to be able to come back after that 1st round and win just about every round after that.
I can live with the draw in the Pac-JMM fight, even though I thought Pac pulled it off. I watched the fight live at ringside and wouldn't have been surprised either way. I thought it was a real close fight. Did not really score it round for round but the impression I got was that it was a close fight. JMM definitely did not win all rounds after the first. Anyone that says so otherwise is not only a nuthugger but a third testicle.
jmm i felt did enough to win the fight , so to me the fight wasnt a robbery but that dlh/mosley fight...... DLH GOT ROBBED! just look at mosely's reaction to the decision, his face says it all.
What's even dumber is that they can't go back and award the win to Pac. These damn rules make it so impossible for a credible protest by a boxer's camp to over-turn a ruling, even if it's as trivial as a scoring error.
I voted Marquez Pacquio being the worse decision, simply because the one judge who tipped the fight to being a draw went back on his own card, admitted he made an embarassing error, and said he should have scored that first round as the other judges did.
To me, that shows there was a clear and admitted error in the scoring of that fight.
None of the judges who scored Mosley Delahoya II as they did feel they did anything wrong, and despite the sentiment here in this thread, if you go back to that night the majority of Press row scoring had Mosley winning, as did the Assoc Press (116-113).
Rewatching that fight, you notice the work Mosley did to the body may have won him some of the closer rounds.
It could have definatly gone to Oscar, but I don't think the decision was as bad as Marquez escaping with a draw in that fight with Manny because a judge made a very embarassing mistake he immediatly admitted was stupid of him.
20y ago
Worst decision.. DLH-Mosley II or JMM-Pacquiao | BoxingScene Community