Why is it that B-Hop is overrated, but Hagler is the greatest middle ever?

Look at their records. Now, I'm not saying that Hagler isn't the greatest middleweight ever, or that B-Hop is overrated, but there are so many people (especially on this site), who slag on B-Hop all day because of his opposition, never changing weight classes, and who his biggest wins are against. Who are Hagler's greatest wins against? Leonard, Hearns, and Duran, no? Duran started as a bantamweight, and is considered to be one of the, perhaps the greatest lightweight of all time. Leonard definitely wasn't a natural middleweight, having started at Jr. Welter. And Hearns was no natural middleweight, either, having started at welterweight. B-Hops biggest wins come against Tito and De La Hoya, and Tito was favored to WIN against B-Hop when they fought each other. Look at both of their records. Hagler fought a bunch of nobodies throughout a lot of his career, and NEVER moved from middleweight. B-Hop fought similarly, and never moved from middleweight. Why is it that B-Hop is not anywhere near the top 10, even though he fought the best in his division for his time, but Hagler is the greatest when he too fought the best in his division for his time. Both of them having their biggest wins come over naturally smaller men. EDIT: Sorry if this is a bit sloppy, I'm in a rush out of here, but didn't want to leave this post unfinished.