Pathetic journalists...

i'v read a lot of articles regarding Pacquiao-Morales II and have read that several journalists kept on looking for excuses for Morales like his fights has taken toll on him... etc. it was very clear that Morales beat a less 100% Pacquiao in their first fight and Pacquiao has justified his reasons in their 2nd fight. After that, Morales hasnt realy been beaten badly until recently. It was also clear that Morales said it before the fight that he was very much prepared. It was also obvious that Pacquiao has changed his style. He improved a bit in his defense, addedd more arsenals, targeted particular spots, picked only the right timing, and had great footwork and avoided the ropes fairly well. what i dont understand is why these journalist had to invent reasons for Morales. And that why cant they accept that Pacquiao is just the best fighter out there than EM, MAB and JMM. before Pacquiao had badly beaten MAB very convincingly with both hands and yet you will hear them asking each other saying, "is Barrera that bad or Pacquiao that good." i mean hello, you wont call a fighter a legend if you'll doubt whether he's bad or not. Pacquiao has decked JMM 3x in the 1st round. the decision was a draw. but it was clear that a stupid judge just made a mistake in the score cards that cost Manny the victory. some claimed that Pac was a one dimentinal and cant win to JMM. but their fighter looked for a stupid reason to avoid the rematch out of fear. JMM knows that the 2nd time around, he will be stoped. he fears to be rushed to the hospital or to the cemetery. Pacquiao lost once to Morales and stated some reasons why he lost. many disliked Manny for making such reasons. but even so, he had proven his reason to be legit. unlike most, all reasons but have no balls to prove their reasons. the 3M's are good at that. but these journalists comes along with their nuts and hugging. Pathetic! :boxing: