Well, Pacquiao proved me wrong about the gloves. I thought there was no way he lost the first fight just because of what gloves he used, but now we all see it's true. And remember, it's not an excuse if it's true.
Pacquiao > Morales AND Barrera now
Both fights counts! Let's put this glove issue to rest. Morales won the first, Pacman won the second. While that gloves issue was being discussed here as a factor, that is not to be used to remove the credit away from Eric's victory on theirt first fight.
Thank you. :D
Both fights counts! Let's put this glove issue to rest. Morales won the first, Pacman won the second. While that gloves issue was being discussed here as a factor, that is not to be used to remove the credit away from Eric's victory on theirt first fight.
Heh, agreed.
I made a post last night but I don't feel like copy pasting it.
The gloves can't be used to discredit Morales' victory. If anybody discredits Morales' win by claiming the gloves won it for him, then I will vehemently and unrelenting mention how Morales isn't what he used to be and has a very hard time making the fight. So choose wisely: Both fights count or neither fights count.
not sure about the gloves. I think it was the fact that Manny continued to hit the body from start to finish. That allowed him to hit morales more in the face to bruise up his face. In the first fight manny stop going to the body after round 1 and that allowed morales to continue to be in the fight. MAnny didnt even give a chance for morales to respond with his constnat attack
If Pacquiao wins the fight, you gotta believe him. He stopped Morales this time so it had to be the gloves.
Well, Pacquiao proved me wrong about the gloves. I thought there was no way he lost the first fight just because of what gloves he used, but now we all see it's true. And remember, it's not an excuse if it's true.
Naz > Pacquiao > Morales AND Barrera now
Ahhh, im glad you agree.