Clip: Manny KO's Eric Morales

i think they make them

wheredo you get these gifs? is there like a site you can dl them from?

i've been reading the back and forth argument between bozo and e-mc2 and conclude that bozo is right and e-mc2 has poor reading skills. I hope that helps.

Pacquiao KOs Morales! Knock down #1: http://www.photopile.com/photos/dantzu/auctions/237816.gif Knock down #2: http://www.photopile.com/photos/dantzu/auctions/237817.gif In a battle of super featherweight superstars, Manny Pacquiao (41-3-1, 32 KOs) knocked out Erik Morales (48-4, 34 KOs) in round ten Saturday night at the Thomas & Mack Arena in Las Vegas. After falling behind early, Pacquiao turned up the heat in round six and started a brutal beatdown of Morales, who went down twice in the tenth. thanks again for the clip bro!!!!

I never said you said it was a travesty. Did I say that? Rock on Dude

I'm saying his resume should show KO wins over Barrera and Morales and a W dec over Marquez. There's plenty of that in boxing over the decades. Lots of "should have's" and "would have's". Officially Manny drew. Get over it. Marquez showed how to deal with Manny if you've got the staying power, which he demonstrated. A genuine travesty was the scoring of Lewis vs Holyfield I I never said it was a travesty NOOB. I said it once, and it was only beat to death because this other guy needed to dwell on it with what ifs.

I'm saying his resume should show KO wins over Barrera and Morales and a W dec over Marquez. There's plenty of that in boxing over the decades. Lots of "should have's" and "would have's". Officially Manny drew. Get over it. Marquez showed how to deal with Manny if you've got the staying power, which he demonstrated. A genuine travesty was the scoring of Lewis vs Holyfield I

E=MC2 contradicts himself Pacman is the best overall, though I think there is a sound chance that he can loose the remath with JMM. He was thoroughly outclassed by JMM in terms of boxing skills the first time. I do not think it would be very different the second time. It is indeed funny how you contradict yourself. Maybe you were also one of the people who said the same thing about MORALES-PACQUIAO 2, that it would be no different from the first. Dont you get it? Pacquiao makes adjustments to his game plan - or maybe you were blind to last night's fight. JMM doesnt deserve a rematch because he doesnt pull in the interest of fight fans. But he can go ahead and ride the coattails of Pacquiao anytime. But on Pacquiao's terms, capice?

P.S. "Saving face" is the last thing I care about in an anonymous forum; my only purpose here is to entertain myself. Don't believe me? See my "Tyson becoming a priest thread." You should have abandoned my thread after I explained my statement to you the 1st time, yet you kept at it for 7 pages. You just said you'd leave and stop the spamming, yet you come back to tell me you're not interested in saving face. :rolleyes:

That's not my point at all. What I said is absolutly true. If one judge hadn't made a mistake he admitted later was wrong, Manny has a W over Marquez on his record. That's a fact. All you came back with was: Which, again, is supposing the fight itself wouldn't have went the way it did. You disagreed with my statement which was correct, and asserted a bunch of 'ifs' about the fight happening differently. I take nothing away from Marquez, he's a great fighter. But he escaped that fight with a draw because of an error one very ignorant judge made on his score card. All you've done is tried to save face, and spammed my thread. P.S. "Saving face" is the last thing I care about in an anonymous forum; my only purpose here is to entertain myself. Don't believe me? See my "Tyson becoming a priest" thread.

what a shot

Your point is to try to replace a "D" with "W" for Manny, and thus make him the conquerer of all the three great Mexican fighters. Your point is based on an "if" argument. A slight reversion of this argument, however, yields the opposite conclusion. Thus, your argument is not very robust. The fight was a great win for Marquez in my mind; it was a trimuph of the mind, skill, and heart. You can not take that away from Marquez. That's not my point at all. What I said is absolutly true. If one judge hadn't made a mistake he admitted later was wrong, Manny has a W over Marquez on his record. That's a fact. All you came back with was: I disagree. If Marquez was more careful in round 1, he would have beaten Pacman by a landslide. If you take round 1 away, the result is an easy win for Marques. If they fight again, JMM will soundly defeat Pacman. Which, again, is a hypothetical wisfull take about the fight happening differently than it actually did. You disagreed with my statement which was correct, and asserted a bunch of 'ifs' about the fight happening differently. I take nothing away from Marquez, he's a great fighter. But he escaped that fight with a draw because of an error one very ignorant judge made on his score card. All you've done is tried to save face, and spammed my thread.

In any case, I now abandon your thread.

Your point is to try to replace a "D" with a "W" for Manny, and thus make him the conquerer of all the three great Mexican fighters. Your point is based on an "if" argument. A slight reversion of this argument, however, yields the opposite conclusion. Thus, your argument is not very robust. The fight was a great win for Marquez in my mind; it was a trimuph of the mind, skill, and heart. You can not take that away from Marquez.

You have to prove your points. Repeating your assertions without proof does not consitute a valid argument. Plus, now you are trying to make it personal, which is always a weapon of last resort for a weak mind. You have done nothing but repeat a weak view point. I'll take you back to what I said in the 1st place: It's really a shame a mistake on a score card is all that seperates Manny from having wins over Morales Barrera and Marquez. what do you mean? Manny was screwed in the Marquez fight by a judge who admittedly made an error he wouldn't have if he'd been smart enough to catch it at the time. I'm saying his resume should show KO wins over Barrera and Morales and a W dec over Marquez. I disagree. If Marquez was more careful in round 1, he would have beaten Pacman by a landslide. If you take round 1 away, the result is an easy win for Marques. If they fight again, JMM will soundly defeat Pacman. What you took issue with in the 1st place stemmed from a weak and biased agenda. You think Marquez was the better fighter in the 1st fight despite the fact he only escaped with a draw because a judge made an error on a score card he shouldn't have. All you had was "Ifs". You didn't have a point, and spammed my thread needlessly.

With what happened in the fight itself, Manny was robbed of a win by an error on a judges score card. He was not robbed de jure.

It's quite simple, and shows why your point has no logic and stems from desperation. Your logic is weak, and stems from having a desperate agending wishing very badly that the fight had not played out the way it did. You have to prove your points. Repeating your assertions without proof does not consitute a valid argument. Plus, now you are trying to make it personal, which is always a weapon of last resort for a weak mind.

You point is, if the judge had scored the first round 10:6, Pacman would have won. Therefore, Marquez was lucky to escape that fight with a "D". My point is, if JMM had been just a little more careful in round 1, he would have won the fight easily. Therefore, Pacman was lucky to escape that fight with a "D". So we have two "ifs": yours and mine. I do not see why your "if" is better than my "if", or vice versa, for that matter. :p It's quite simple, and shows why your point has no logic and stems from desperation. The judge making an error on his score card had nothing to do with changing what happened in the fight. Your only point consists of an "If" something different happned in the fight. With what happened in the fight itself, Manny was robbed of a win by an error on a judges score card. Your logic is weak, and stems from having a desperate agending wishing very badly that the fight had not played out the way it did.

I agree man. Pac will fuckin rule now. I see nobody in the right divisions that can beat him. Just a fuckin BEAST! agreed. pac officialy cant b touched at his weight class

Pacquiao is da man RIGHT NOW and for the next 3 years! JMM couldnt even get a high enough paycheck to fight pacquiao and he used that to avoid a date with manny in the first fight. And currently, promoters will not pay him anymore money than what they gave him in the first. He may have "outboxed" pacquiao later on but he clearly lost the fight on points. Manny & Freddie Roach will make the adjustments to make this a future no-brainer win for Manny. So i dont see this fight happening in the near future. As for Barreira? I cannot see any change in the result from the first fight!!! How can he make any adjustment as he was TOTALLY OUTCLASSED in the first. There is such a thing as CONTRA-FELLOW (as we say) -- meaning Barrera's style and skills are just so compatible and therefore easy pickings for Manny. In other words, MANNY HAS GOT BARRERA'S NUMBER RIGHT NOW and forever and nothing can change that in the next 3 years (except an injury). EMC=2 quit talking about that fluke draw! What matters NOW is "WHO'S DA MAN!" and MANNY is the MAN! Pacman is the best overall, though I think there is a sound chance that he can loose the remath with JMM. He was thoroughly outclassed by JMM in terms of boxing skills the first time. I do not think it would be very different the second time.