Oscar De La Hoya: why bother?

I know this gets brought up from time to time but considering I watched Mosley-Oscar 2 on Tuesday and Oscar-Quartey last night-its on my mind. When you couple those fights with his Sturm fight and the Trinidad fight and the body shot in the Hopkins fight, isn't the 800 pound elephant in the room that no boxing writer will touch the fact that his big fights are perhaps beyond controversial to the point of beign suspicious? How will history treat this situation. There isn't a contemporary fighter that has had the screwjobs (both ways) this guy has had. In the end there is this question that I'd like to take a vote on: Are Oscar's fights influenced by dirty forces (be it the judges, promoters, the fighters themselves) or is his style that of which the judges have a tough time interpreting. I really think the former because in the Sturm fight especially I didn't think many of those rounds were even close. I don't start this thread as a pro-Oscar or anti-Oscar debate as a fighter but are his fight on the up and up in your opinion. thanks for reading