Who is the better Klitschko?

Wlad has some good skills but Vitali has an edge on chin,stamina and maybe a little on power. I would have to go with Vitali on this one

technically wlad seems the better fighter, but since being koed hes looked shit scared, unlike vitali who fights with his hands low, and isnt afraid to get hit, knowing he will land more shots. so until vitali actually fights some top guys, wlad shades it though in a match against each other id pick vitali 10 / 10 until he actually fights somebody?! lennox lewes, kirk johnson, herby hide, corrie sanders, chris byrd, are these guys nobodys? btw, he wont be fighting anybody elese, since he is retired. duh!

wlad is a better fighter but yet has the glass chin

Wlad is the better fighter NOW. I know this is a big IF, but just imagine if Wladimir had the chin of his brothers. That would be scary. yes, i would be scary. the truth is that they are both great fighters, who have extrodinary size, and power. wlad has the supirior skill, and vitali has the better chin. i think vitali is the better fighter because he was able to use his size and power to compensate for his lack of skills. wlad has not been able to do the same for his weak chin. and dont get me wrong, im a fan of both of them, and i think that wlad can dominate this division now taht he is with manny steward. i believe that they are both class acts, and very intellegent individuals. i just think that vitali is the better all-around fighter.

they're both big fags. But overall, Wladimir easily, it isn't even close. Vitali only has a chin. You kind of need a chin to be successful in the heavyweight division. Otherwise, wouldn't Golota have become champ? :rolleyes:

vitali better chn

Wlad is more skilled with a glass chin. Vitali is less skilled with a better chin. Vitali has had the luck of having many fighters coming in overweight for big fights.

Vitali was never knocked down or out in his professional career. He was also never behind on cards by the time the fight was stopped, even those he has lost. He might not have the best resume and most attractive style but it was effective. Too bad he retired leaving many questions unanswered. So, I think that Vitali is the better of the two.

The only thing that separates them is Vitali's chin when you break it down. They can both take out any heavyweight out there with their power (even though most people say Wlad's is better). Wlad can have all the power and finesse and skill in the world, but when you break it down, he has no chin, and he will be KO'ed. The man has no chance to dominate as a champion like Vitali had.

For me, it's about even. Wlad has beaten mo quality opponents than Vitali, but Vitali became recognized by many AS THE MAN ta heavy despite his poor resume. Vitali may have done betta moneywise too considering he had a PPV defense. Wlad's mo skilled, but Vitali has the betta punch resistance. Wlad may get dropped alot, but Vitali has quit once, got beaten twice by TKO and retired. it's about even IMV!