Top 5 Most UNdeserving title holders

Well Hatton was the number 1 contender and the WBA was to order the purse bid or negotiations to begin and Hatton gave up the #1 contendership. And Harris had already been calling Hatton out for at least a year prior. He even gladly offered to go to England. Cause he went to Germany and beat Urkal twice. it's called the business of boxing :p

I don't really care that he has it. Harris didn't deserve it either. But neither did Tszyu since he didn't defend it for well over a year. So I'm fine with Hatton having it, although he got it in a bullshit way, which is why I call him undeserving. Had he not ducked Harris, which hell if Maussa beat Harris, Hatton should have, then I'd say he definitely deserved it. Hatton gave up his #1 contendership though. Hatton probably isn't the top 5 undeserving, but I didn't want to just keep repeating everyone. did he really ducked harris? then is he going to duck pbf too? hahaha! i really dont know much of hatton's way of handling his career... but by beating KT was my basis.. but you have the right words... that he is not "purely deserving" with the title he has.

Since Ruiz wasn't the real champ in the first place, Valuev couldn't be considered one. Valuev Vitali Ruiz Hatton for the WBA title (waited until Harris got upset to go after it) Diego Corrales IMO hatton is fit for the title... he can legitimize it by fighting and winning against PBF

valuev vitali taylor byrd rahman

That's why you're an amatuer ref...sorry bud. Ruiz won, and everyone knows it. Not only that, but Valuev lost against Larry Donald. No one who loses to him deserves a title. Klitschko was deserving. Manny P being an idiot like usual. Klitschko got his off of a legit win. dude its kinda hard to be the ref in pro fights when pro fights are illegal here, but the course i took works for both ammature and queensberry. do you think ruiz should be given points for rabbit punchin, hitting while holding and punches landed to arms and shoulders. if you do you could give it to ruiz. valuev controlled the fight and landed more clean shots, in other words he won and deserved to

ernie terrel, jimmy ellis, primo carnera, jack sharkey, and nicolay valuev. go here! http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57044

hmm im not saying ruiz fough dirty im saying shots landed to backhead, shotslanded when holding and punches on albows and shoulders dont cunt. especially the combos are hard to tell fore the untrained eye. That's why you're an amatuer ref...sorry bud. Ruiz won, and everyone knows it. Not only that, but Valuev lost against Larry Donald. No one who loses to him deserves a title. Klitschko was deserving. Manny P being an idiot like usual. Klitschko got his off of a legit win.

1. Pongsaklek Wonjongkam - Paper champ who keeps backing out of an Arce fight. Fights only in his country Thailand most of the time. 2. Juan Manuel Marquez - Defended title against Salido who? and Polo who?, when a bunch of other fights can be made for him...named Pacman, Morales, Barrera, Injin Chi, Scott etc. And now will fight Chris who? just so he can get his precious belt back. 3. All the Heavyweights :D 4. jermaine taylor -- has to be winky.. they must fight to prove his worth

what do u guys think about ruiz being an undeserving champion? he lost to toney and because he tested positive for steroids they gave it back to him. when it has been proven that the meds toney took for his injury would give him the positive test. i would just like your guys opinions because i am undecided.

The undeserving ones are the ones that don't defend their titles against tough oppositions(well maybe mandatories:still sucks). The ones that fight once a year. Or those who was given belts fo weak reasons. 1. Chris Byrd IBF Champion is undeserving in ma opinion. 2. Vitali Klitschko when he held his WBC belt is undeserving. 3. Ricardo Mayorga holds a WBC title and definitely don't deserve it. I agree about Mayorga. The other two picked up vacant belts against viable opponents. Markus Beyer Won his title on a questionable decision, held it on dubious officiating and then lost it to a mediocre fighter. The only impressive title result on his resume is the MD against Danny Green. Ricardo Mayorga won his title after only having one fight at superwelter and against a guy who had never beaten a top-flight fighter and wasn't ranked in the Ring's top ten. Hasim Rahman was lucky not to have to fight Klitschko. I don't mean that he would have been beaten. I have no idea what the result would have been. But he got his title in a lackluster showing against a lower-echelon top-ten guy. I like Arthur Abraham, but I don't think he should be a titlist. The stripping of Taylor's title was bullshit. Alejandro Garcia never had to rematch against the only guy to beat him.

1. Byrd 2. Rahman 3. O'Neil Bell 4. Fabrice Tiozzo 5. Calfaggy i would say valuev, but he got rid of ruiz, and he deserves a title for that.

number 1 juan diaz

What did you look for, Ieff? same as allways legal clean shots. many of ruiz`s combo landed on valuevs guard and and shoulders, pluss ruiz also hit him some times in the back and some whan holding. im not saying ruiz fough dirty im saying shots landed to backhead, shotslanded when holding and punches on albows and shoulders dont cunt. especially the combos are hard to tell fore the untrained eye.

ya but he shoulndt even got that shot, donald beat him 10-2 easly i cant say cause i only saw half the fight and what i saw was pretty close.

ummm yes he did. i had to se the fight in slowmotion with pen and papir the third time i saw it to decide (im an ammature ref). valuev did win by small margins. ya but he shoulndt even got that shot, donald beat him 10-2 easly

as far as I'm concerned he didn't win that belt. ummm yes he did. i had to se the fight in slowmotion with pen and papir the third time i saw it to decide (im an ammature ref). valuev did win by small margins.

The undeserving ones are the ones that don't defend their titles against tough oppositions(well maybe mandatories:still sucks). The ones that fight once a year. Or those who was given belts fo weak reasons. 1. Chris Byrd IBF Champion is undeserving in ma opinion. 2. Vitali Klitschko when he held his WBC belt is undeserving. 3. Ricardo Mayorga holds a WBC title and definitely don't deserve it. in that case all hw champs execpt brewster, byrd fight seldom and rather fought williamson instead of wlad. rahman was simply given the belt. valuev simply stod away and pawned his jab for 12 rounds.

The undeserving ones are the ones that don't defend their titles against tough oppositions(well maybe mandatories:still sucks). The ones that fight once a year. Or those who was given belts fo weak reasons. 1. Chris Byrd IBF Champion is undeserving in ma opinion. 2. Vitali Klitschko when he held his WBC belt is undeserving. 3. Ricardo Mayorga holds a WBC title and definitely don't deserve it.

rahman comes to my mind since the tittel was given to him

it's sort-of a tough question to answer without knowing every little element involved in that title-holders history, at least for me its tough.