Do You Guys Think....

i think that's a bit of an overstatement. The guy is only 29 years old. Hopkins is just beginning to "fade" and he's 41. Morales only losses to Barrera were, of course, close. And i don't think it's very fair to call i fighter faded because of one loss (Raheem). I think Morales still has a good deal left. Totally agree. Theirs no way Morales is fading or has shown signs of fading. He's still got his speed power and can still take a punch.

Pac has a great trainer. i think pac can beat the fading morales now. i think that's a bit of an overstatement. The guy is only 29 years old. Hopkins is just beginning to "fade" and he's 41. Morales only losses to Barrera were, of course, close. And i don't think it's very fair to call i fighter faded because of one loss (Raheem). I think Morales still has a good deal left.

Pac has a great trainer. i think pac can beat the fading morales now.

well, if it's a close fight.. maybe i'd understand and wouldn't mind as much.. If it's an obvious Morales win than i'd be pretty irritated because i hate when money takes over the sport (which is quite often). Yeah I agree, I sure wouldn't mind watching these guys go at it a thrid time but only if it's needed.

no trilogy on this two i think.. the winner of this fight will have a ticket for barera's belts.. if pacman wins he fights barera and stay there(jr. lightweight).. if morales wins i think he will ditch that ticket and go for raheem.

that if the morales-pacquiao fight goes the distance and is pretty close that the judges would give the fight to pacman just so theirs a trilogy between these guy? well, if it's a close fight.. maybe i'd understand and wouldn't mind as much.. If it's an obvious Morales win than i'd be pretty irritated because i hate when money takes over the sport (which is quite often).