Which do you prefer???

I'm glad a lot of you guys see this as more than a simple answer. Watching boxers can be boring when you put 2 in the ring, though watching a boxer dismantle a puncher is great stuff. Of course watching a puncher land that 1 shot to turn it all around is what makes you jump out of your seat. Funny how we love the sport of "boxing", though some of us prefer the no skilled sluggers over boxers :)

the puncher. i dont like fighters who use the ring more often. i love those fighters who would dig in and punch their way to victory

oh, easily the boxer over a puncher... RastaSmoker made the right point. Of course punchers will have the possibility of being more excited but i stand by boxer.

Theres nothing beter then seeing KO ! got to go with puncher !

I voted for puncher but both have their moments.

A boxer that has a punch ;)

most deff the puncher, nothing like seeing someone get ktfo....

nothing beats a KO..

definantly the boxer, anyone can be a puncher, but a boxer, thats a different story, if you watch a truly gifted BOXER its like watching poetry in motion

The puncher you put two boxers in the ring you get Jones vs. Tarver. I like both of the guys, but the last fight I wish I would have kept my fifty bucks. i felt the same way. i felt so cheated after that "fight".

The puncher you put two boxers in the ring you get Jones vs. Tarver. I like both of the guys, but the last fight I wish I would have kept my fifty bucks.

ali is a boxer, so it's the boxer!

its really hard to say i like both as long as the fighter has style .

the puncher, fucking duh.

i definately prefer the puncher, cause alot of fights with two boxers are BOOOORRRIIINNGGG!!