Who are some GREAT fighters that were shitty amateurs? and great amaterus that sucked

Even if he was an Alterante at the Olympics he was still a friggin Gold Medalist he was a very good amateur fighter. oh no i agree with that ..i think the only guy that had his number was buster in the ams

Even if he was an Alterante at the Olympics he was still a friggin Gold Medalist he was a very good amateur fighter.

once again you have made a highly inaccurate statement about boxing history. way to go buttfly. sorry but Joe was an ALT also at the OLYMpics ...buster did beat him for the spot but got hurt joe was the runner up.....

i think joe frazier was a bad amateur. partly because joe was a slow starter, so if the amateurs are three rounds, then joe wouldn't have enough time to get going, but in the pros he would. http://www.kontaktrunde.de/boxing/frazier.jpg likewise buster mathis was a very good amateur, but a bum as a pro. once again you have made a highly inaccurate statement about boxing history. way to go buttfly.

Joe Fraiser won a gold medal in the Olympics he was a pretty friggin good amatuer.

u want an example of a great amateur and bad pro....just look at David Reid. he was wrecked...him and his lazy ass eye...LOL You must be joking man, he only had 14 fights when he took on Trinidad :eek:

u want an example of a great amateur and bad pro....just look at David Reid. he was wrecked...him and his lazy ass eye...LOL

i think joe frazier was a bad amateur. partly because joe was a slow starter, so if the amateurs are three rounds, then joe wouldn't have enough time to get going, but in the pros he would. http://www.kontaktrunde.de/boxing/frazier.jpg likewise buster mathis was a very good amateur, but a bum as a pro. Joe Frazier was an Olympic Gold Medalist, Joe beat Buster Mathis at both the Olympic Trials and Olympic Box-Offs.

correct me if i'm wrong but was'nt frazier the 1964 olympic champ? if that's a shitty amateur then i don't know what you'd call a good one!

Name some to show JUYJUY that amateurs and professionals are a whole different game.. Brandon Gonzales Andre Ward Tha_Greatest Great Amateurs but well you know...

david tua was a shity ameatur because hes not the "win on points" type of guy

i think joe frazier was. partly because joe was a slow starter, so if the amateurs are three rounds, then joe wouldn't have enough time to get going, but in the pros he would. buster mathis .sr beat joe a few times as amateurs lost to him and ali as a pro....henry tillman beat tyson 2 times or more as amateurs and lost to him by ko 1 in the pros

hmm Well, my uncle was like 350-9 in the amateurs, one of the highest rated ever in U.S. history back in the 70's, but as a pro he was old and had no legs. I think he went 0-4 or 1-4 as a pro.

duh rocky marciano

i think joe frazier was a bad amateur. partly because joe was a slow starter, so if the amateurs are three rounds, then joe wouldn't have enough time to get going, but in the pros he would. http://www.kontaktrunde.de/boxing/frazier.jpg likewise buster mathis was a very good amateur, but a bum as a pro.