taylor brought an elvis impersonator on the stage and said bernard hes got a message for you. the impersonator started to sing....
"you aint nothin but a hound dog
cryin all time"
that is some pretty funny shit...and i'm glad the dumbass Taylor did that...that type of thing will take b-hop to the next level....and yeah whoever said that the fans thought Taylor won..needs to talk to the 150 people i've talked to and of these bout 130 of say Hop got robbed...thats neither here or there tho..the decision was the decisiong..Duane Ford can now live happily with the millions he made....and on Dec 3....Taylor is gonna look like a mistake to boxing fans around the world
lol
I wouldn't be talking.
Scap is the 3rd smartest person on this website.
you bolded out that statment alone yet comment on none of the rest, scarp the top 3 smartest person on this site? behind u right? lmao
no your just an idiot, bernard was at his best when he KO'd echols in 2000 and KO'd tito in 2001, about 4-5 years ago, stop bugging me
and to answer your question the last middleweight who he stopped was morrade hakkar in 2003, bout 2 years ago
lol
I wouldn't be talking.
Scap is the 3rd smartest person on this website.
Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30
better at 35 than he was at 25 I would agree, but this is nonsense.
And it is testified by the fact that he has to economize his energies to the extent of losing fights (taylor) or doing nothing for rounds (eastman). I think the last badass performance by hopkins was against joppy.
Nard is all of a sudden faded?
This is a bad post Sturm...I got news for you Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30 but you probably didnt know this.
Nard will sit back and again wait for his younger opponenet to tire but It is my belief that Taylor will not fade this time...could be wrong but who was the last middlweight Nard ko'd? (OScar doesnt count)
no your just an idiot, bernard was at his best when he KO'd echols in 2000 and KO'd tito in 2001, about 4-5 years ago, stop bugging me
and to answer your question the last middleweight who he stopped was morrade hakkar in 2003, bout 2 years ago
why cant he? besides, look how hard it was for taylor to "win" agaisnt a 40 year old man, a younger nard would KO'd him like tito in the 12th but he could still do it now, taylor is not even better then a faded hopkins
Nard is all of a sudden faded?
This is a bad post Sturm...I got news for you Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30 but you probably didnt know this.
Nard will sit back and again wait for his younger opponenet to tire but It is my belief that Taylor will not fade this time...could be wrong but who was the last middlweight Nard ko'd? (OScar doesnt count)
Taylor got the nod in the first fight...
Everyone acted like he needed to apologize for getting the decision and giving Nard his toughest scrap in over a decade....
So...
Taylor needs to stand up for himslef and Im glad he is doing it, so alot of exerts think Nard deserved the nod...so...should Taylor apologize and kiss Nards ass...
Taylor is a warrior and I got news for a lot of you new Hopkins watchers...he aint coming out after Jermain...what you saw in the last fight from Hopkins is what your gonna see in the rematch...he has been fighting the same type of fight since Trinidad.
Taylor is the one that will come into the ring a new and improved fighter...If Bernard couldnt KO him in rounds 10/12 in the last fight he is not going to KO him in this fight.
why cant he? besides, look how hard it was for taylor to "win" agaisnt a 40 year old man, a younger nard would KO'd him like tito in the 12th but he could still do it now, taylor is not even better then a faded hopkins
yeah... whoever said most fans think Taylor won must be confused.. anyway, glad to see Taylor seeming to take this whole situation so lightly, to bad Hopkins knows he can take anything Taylor throws at him and is searing with confidence. it'll make for a more clear win this time around. If Taylor does plan on winning again, he better change something cause i guarentee Bernard "The Executioner" Hopkins isn't playing around with his legacy come December 3rd.
btw, here's a pic, didn't see it posted yet:
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20051116/capt.tngc10311160328.taylor_hopkins_tngc103.jpg
Taylor got the nod in the first fight...
Everyone acted like he needed to apologize for getting the decision and giving Nard his toughest scrap in over a decade....
So...
Taylor needs to stand up for himslef and Im glad he is doing it, so alot of exerts think Nard deserved the nod...so...should Taylor apologize and kiss Nards ass...
Taylor is a warrior and I got news for a lot of you new Hopkins watchers...he aint coming out after Jermain...what you saw in the last fight from Hopkins is what your gonna see in the rematch...he has been fighting the same type of fight since Trinidad.
Taylor is the one that will come into the ring a new and improved fighter...If Bernard couldnt KO him in rounds 10/12 in the last fight he is not going to KO him in this fight.
taylor is the man and will win if he fights up to his full ability. i lost all respect for hopkins after that cancer shit he said. he's a heartless thug. taylor is a classact. i hate people saying oh taylor has no respect. he did but hopkins is just an awuful person.
I have no ill will against you, but this is the comment of someone who hasn't watched boxing for very long. I merely made an observation. This was not a controversial decision.
Mosely-DLH II is controversial.
Byrd-Oquendo...controversial.
Briggs-Foreman...controversial.
Watch these fights and learn what controversy REALLY is.
fair enough..
hmm
Additionally, Taylor has every right to play mind games and taunt Hopkins. Hopkins is clasless when it comes to mind games. He is a true prison thug who talks about his opponents dead family members. Taylor having a little Elvis imersonation is nothing compared to that.
No disrespect to Hopkins as a fighter. He's one of the greats.
hmm
winning may be winning, but dont talk shit after the fight if u have just got a CONTROVERSIAL decision.
I have no ill will against you, but this is the comment of someone who hasn't watched boxing for very long. I merely made an observation. This was not a controversial decision.
Mosely-DLH II is controversial.
Byrd-Oquendo...controversial.
Briggs-Foreman...controversial.
Watch these fights and learn what controversy REALLY is.
There was nothing controversial about it.
You obviously haven't been watching the fight game that long. There's no need to whine about robberies in a close fight. Most fans feel Taylor won anyway. Every close fight doesn't need to be debated. It's close. Deal with it. Same with Mayorga-Forrest II and others.
i aint whining about anything. im jus sayin dont talk shit if youve only JUST won a close fight!
and wot does how long ive been watching boxing have to do with anything, i can have my opinion bout who won!
LOL, I love how Hopkins talks shit ALL THE TIME and now that Taylor does it, Hopkins is the poor innocent victim. You reap what you sow Hopkins, grow some balls and deal with it.
Exactly, Hopkins has been bitching since losing his titles, trying to get the decision over turned, instead of taking his loss as a man.
taylor is a bitch and will be KO'd
hopkins hasnt ko'd anybody other then blown up welterweights in a decade..i doubt he ko's taylor...he probably wont start fighting until round 8 like he did the last match
hmm
There was nothing controversial about it.
You obviously haven't been watching the fight game that long. There's no need to whine about robberies in a close fight. Most fans feel Taylor won anyway. Every close fight doesn't need to be debated. It's close. Deal with it. Same with Mayorga-Forrest II and others.