hopkins was robbed? wtf..from reading forum post the fight was nothing like u ppl said..hopkins lost every round other then the 5th 10th 11th and 12th..eating 3 jabs and then ducking the 4th and walking away with ur hands down like ur a 'slick' fighter dosent win u that exchanged..i should have known better when the majority of u jirov beat mesi when he GOT BEAT every round but the last 3 i hope none of u have any plans on being boxing judges
Yes look for a big knockout next time. Hopkins will be knocked out next time, because he probably thinks he can brawl with Taylor next time. I can't believe you just mentioned the emergency room. Taylor had a cut, thank to Bernard's head. I guess you're proud of the blood, just like Bernard. Who was it running like a bunny & doing nothing for 9 rounds??? Who was it holding & hitting every time????
wrong, the cut was from taylor's head hitting bernards chin/face. that butt was taylor's fault for rushing in. did you not watch the free replay? taylor had a concussion and his cheeks were puffy after the fight, hopkins did not look like he'd been in a fight.
it was later when hopkins headbutted taylor in the jaws
i thought hopkins won a close fight and i expect him to do better in the rematch
Who was it that had to go to the emergency room after the fight? Who landed 10 fewer punches than their opponent by the end of 12 rounds? Who was given the nod in every close round? - THE NEW MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLD, JERMAINE TAYLOR.
This decision was garbage. Being the busier fighter doesn't mean much when you miss nearly all of your punches. Hopkins has Taylor figured out, look for a big knockout next time around.
IMO. I dont believe Taylor beat Hopkins. Hopkins put himself in that position. Alot of the first six rounds were very close in that neither was landing clean shots and both had the look of being tenative towards one another. Taylors punches, even though he through more were missing or slipping off. I only remember a few that connected. Hopkins does this to most of his opponets, but as the fight wore on into the last three rounds, you all have to admit, you thought hopkins was going to pull off his plan. If he did, we would all being sitting here saying what a genius hopkins was instead of "ohh how great Taylor is"" Taylor is not that good, in the last three or fou rounds, he looked like the old man. I am also upset at the lose for hopkins, but not so much at the judging, if your the champ, close like one...... He should of put The Tired Old Taylor Down..!!! I would have settled for the draw; like i really felt it was. esspecialy after that 12 round judge crap.
I wouldn't say so. Hopkins clearly won more rounds than Taylor, while there were a number that could be debated either way. So having it 116-112 for Hopkins isn't unbelievable in that sense. I don't agree with that, but I can see how it's an option.
If it wasn't for the idiot judge Jerry Roth this fight would've been a UD decision for Taylor. Roth had Hokins winning 116-112. 7 rounds to 3 is not close in my eyes.
excellent point about Roth. WHAT THE F*** kinda scorecards was that?! Isn't he the one that had Mayorga beating Forrest like 116-112? Complete idiot. Jerry Roth is also the guy I believe that gave De La Hoya the 12th round in the Trinidad fight because he had given Trinidad so many earlier rounds he didn't deserve. this guy is horrible, I'm telling you.
yes, giving the 12th round to Taylor is ridiculous in this fight, but not nearly as ridiculous as having Hopkins win it 8 rounds to 4!!!!
If it wasn't for the idiot judge Jerry Roth this fight would've been a UD decision for Taylor. Roth had Hokins winning 116-112. 7 rounds to 3 is not close in my eyes.
We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I can't wait for the rematch though. It's great when a fight has this much debate on the first match. These are the rematches that are golden. Just like the Corrales/Castillo fight.
See Harold Lederman's card because for the first time in his life, he was completely spot on in a difficult fight to score
That would be a correct statement :D
It was not a close fight, Taylor clearly won more rounds.
Parodius this was a close fight. No matter what you want to believe it was close. No one fighter dominated the other. If it wasn't for an idiot judge giving round 12 to Taylor it would have been a draw. Yes in boxing that's a close fight.
Don't score rounds even and you won't have that problem, chump. Even rounds are for wusses. Every round has a winner. If you can't figure out who it was, then stop trying to be a judge.
Round 4 was the biggset example of an even round in my eyes. I seldomly give them out, and I honestly could not award either fight a decision in that round. Neither did anything to prove they wanted it more than the other.
Don't score rounds even and you won't have that problem, chump. Even rounds are for wusses. Every round has a winner. If you can't figure out who it was, then stop trying to be a judge.
See Harold Lederman's card because for the first time in his life, he was completely spot on in a difficult fight to score
Lederman had a decent scorecard for once, I do agree with you. He actually scored it similar to me, except I had Hopkins winning 1 more and a draw 1 round. And I like that you said, "difficult fight to score" because I agree with you.
Excuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins. :D
I will allow this as a good argument... assuming you can fucking lay out the 7 supposed rounds he won in a good fashion. Obviously Talor won rounds 1, 2 and 6. What other 4 did he clearly win?
Oh, and Iwatch, nobody can take you seriously if you have the fight scored 10-2. Not even the biggest Hopkin's haters can have it scored that poorly.
First off homosexual, this is my thread, and I laid out a whole, round by round, go back and read it, if you can, I doubt it retard.
This is dino's thread, try again. And I did read your thread, broken english and flawed points in all. You can't make a good argument for Taylor because you can't even say that Hopkins won 4 rounds. You're an idiot.
Oh, and keep your homosexual fantasies between yourself and boyfriends. I don't want any part of your fudge packing ways.
Excuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins. :D
In boxing, we score by the rounds, see? There is no "take the title from the champion" bullshit in this sport because it is SCORED by the ROUNDS. Judges don't just pick a winner at the end of 12 rounds. They score by the ROUNDS.
Lay off the crack pipe, crackhead, do you watch boxing? Is wrtongful judging non-exsisten now since your boy got dominated ring post to post?
Do you watch boxing? By the looks of your avatar you watch mimes. You just hate Hopkins and don't make any sense. A lot of Taylor's so called win rounds could have gone either way. That is why some people have Hopkins winning the fight. He threw the hardest punches and did the most damage. There is no mistake that when Hopkins wanted to win a round he did. We will see in the next fight if Taylor has what it takes to keep Hopkins from taking the belt back. Which in my opinion will happen.
Your opinions a pile of shit, I give a shit if I speak English or not if it only means I could communicate with retards like you....you can fucking have it, I dont want it, moron, go fuck yourself.
My opinions have a factual base surrounding them. I didn't have anything staked on this fight, nor did I particularly care who won. But I can call bull shit when i see it. If one person can lay down a good argument for Taylor winning the fight I'll be happy. But I can't stand this, "Taylor won becuaes Hopkins ran" or "Taylor won, plain and simple." I have yet to see a good, concise argument from anybody on this board for why Taylor should have won. So, if you can, please feel free to. If not, shut the fuck up.
Lay off the crack pipe, crackhead, do you watch boxing? Is wrtongful judging non-exsisten now since your boy got dominated ring post to post?
neither man was dominant in that fight, close fight that could have went either way, I'll bet you've been DYING for Hopkins to lose ever since he owned Tito, here's your big chance little guy, live it up!
20y ago
taylor easily beat hopkins: u ppl are horrible judges | BoxingScene Community