If they fight which I expect them to
Hopkins should not fight Trinidad again but fight Winky now
Who would win this mega fight for the #1 p4p spot..
This fight can make big history IMO...
I think Winky might just take it..
winky is too small for hopkins, hopkins was too big for trinidad, trinidad was bigger than winky, winky is good but hopkins is nothing like trinidad, he can fight if he wants but will probably lose.
good matchup.
Lets not forget something though. Hopkins is a very good boxer, as well as brawler. His ability to adapt in the ring and change styles might frustrate Wright. IMO...Winky would not be able to intimidate him with the jab like he did against Trinidad. If Nard feels he is being pressured with the jab....he can mix it up on the inside very well. He wont sit...and wait to be potshotted like Trinidad did.
He can come underneath the jab..like he does so many times, with very good uppercutts and looptyloop right hands that Bouie Fischer talks about. Winky has a very good chin...and I dont think Nard would knock him out. I do think however, he would be made to respect his physical size in the ring....as well as his old school tactics. There is no way in hell I would bet against Hopkins in this fight, because that would not be the smart bet in my opinion.
Perhaps some Boo's in the crowd???
Nard:
"The boos don't bother me. I'm from Philadelphia. I've heard people boo Santa Claus."
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
if hopkins fight winky at this time, hopkins will have a better advantage.
time is not on hopkins' side... but he has the skills to match winky's. and he has power stronger than winky
Fuck chess, that's for pussies. Most of these boxers arent the smartest of folks, otherwise they wouldnt have the make a living beating the crap out of each other. I want to watch a real fight, and please dont compare chess to Corrales-Castillo. That was a real boxing match right there.
Read the post right before you smack talk it. I never said Corrales-Castillo was a chess match. I said that during the last two weeks we got the "best of both worlds", Wright-Tito was the chess match and Corrales-Castillo was a war. Both where of the highest quality, imo anyway.
I think Winky will win, Winky could be the best fighter in the world right now and his skill is very elite. Hopkins may be boring but he still has talent but hes not unstoppable. Roy jones proved that many years ago. If Winky trained hard enough and just fought with confidence i bevielve he would handle Hopkins.
Hopkins was a totally different fighter back when he fought Jones, he was a pressure fighter with a high knockout perecentage. He fights nothing now like he did back then.
'Nard would take this fight. Using a previous lost of his..as a reason why Winky would win..isnt fair..cause that was a long time ago..'Nard is a better overall boxer now...i mean..if your gonna do that...bring up Winky's past defeats
I first voted too hard to call, but after thinking about it for a couple of minutes, I realized that Hopkins would make the smaller guy out of him. In my opinion, Hopkins is one of the best fighters at using his advantages, and I think that will be the key to beating Winky.
Hmm...On second thought it could be a really competitive fight. I'd like to see both fighters do well, but I'd be pulling for Hopkins.
I like Wright in a technical boxing match against Hopkins. Sissy jabbing ass? Someone said that, the jab is a weapon and a very effective one when used by a master boxer. :boxing:
I agree with that, its a chess match, full of boxing class and fought with the brain and not only with there fists and agression. If all you want are slugfests with guys knocking shit out of each other watch UFC.
How can you even whine after the last couple of weeks, Corrales vs Castillo then Wright vs Tito, got the best of both worlds.
hmm
Roy and Winky are different fighters. However, Nard was very good when he lost to Roy in 1993. Roy was the challenger and Hopkins showed he was good but Roy was just too fast plus he had enough power to string Hops a bit. Both improved after that but now both are declining. Nard is not as physically strong as he was in the early mid and late 90's.
All in all though, like I said in my previous post, although Roy's win over Bernard shows Nard is not unstoppable, it doesn't really show how Winky can beat Bernard because if Winky does fight Bernard he will use a totally different style.
Also, no fighter in unstoppable anyway. All fighters can be stopped (Roy, Tito, Ali, Judah, Tszyu, Barerra, Castillo, etc).
I know what ur saying but im just saying that Roy proved he is stoppable. Thats all
that is a stupid thing to look at for deciding who you think will win this fight if it ever does happen. that was a long time ago and nard was a different fighter. way too early in his career. hops can be beaten don't get me wrong. but that fight with jones should not even bementioned when talking about the nard of today.
if these two were to fight it would be the biggest snoozefest ever. nards last fight would prolly be second only to this fight. i would definately watch it on the replay. nard is boring enough and would be walking into a jab all night like tito. this fight has the makings for the record least punchs thrown.
hmm
Roy jones proved that many years ago.
Yeah but Roy was super physically gifted and just an athletic freak. I don't think Winky can do much that Roy did. He just has to be smart and fight his fight at all times and hope Hopkins cannot outdo him at his own game.
Hey, who's that in your avatar...Winky? Where'd you get that picture?
I think Winky can beat Hopkins. The fight will come down to mental strength as opposed to physical advantages. Hopkins can beat Winky. Toss up.
Ya, that's Wright in my avatar..
I got it before the fight even happend:D
Go good Winky Wright and you can find it..
The fight result could be very random...