Did this fight make DeLaHoya look bad?

Did this fight make the golden boy look bad? Many also myself believe DLH got robbed... but he didnt dominate Trinidad.. Wright fought the perfect fight without running and puttin power on his punches.... DLH would run land a few punches to try n steal the round then run again... Winky just outclassed him... I think this made DLH look really bad.. That was NOT the same Trinidad.

hmm That's not a very good analysis. Hell, I can spin it and make it sound like DLH actually did better. Let me put it like this. DLH was naturaly smaller than Tito and had less power and did not have the same neutralzing natural style that Wright, but he used the skills he DID have to his best to own Tito (though not as much as Wright did). Also, Wright beat Tito after Tito had been beaten down by Hopkins, after a long layoff, and after having gone through a war with Mayorga. I'm the devil's advocate.

this didn't make De La Hoya look bad, what made De La Hoya look bad was running from Trinidad those last 3 rounds and bitching about the decision after the fight. Everyone knows De La Hoya won the fight, if he wouldn't have bitched so much after that fight people would look at the De La Hoya/Trinidad fight like we look at whitaker/chavez.

Dude, you just copied me. I made this brilliant analysis first. http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35794 I never saw that but this will attract people now:D