Cause people are brain washed, paying 50 bucks to see pay per views that suck, four bucks for an offical boxing magazine that is pure biased crap, paying 20 bucks to be a member to a website, just so you can see boxer interviews, people think that you have to be part of the system to be "in" boxing, which is corrupt as hell..... :D
maybe they do that to keep idiots liek u out :D
funny how something is good till someone people dont liek comes into the frey then its garbage its biased shits like some peeps here on the board tat ruin the boxing community.
Yeah but did Morales win Paq's belt when he beat him? I'm not sure. The problem is I think that the Ring rules were assuming that contenders from the same weight class would fight each other exclusively. If you wanted to fight for a belt, you had to officially step up to that weight class, like Oscar did. I'm not sure if they counted on people fighting guys outside their weight classes in one-time specialty fights, at least not when titles were on the line.
morales did not took Pac's title cuz the fight was at SFW, and the FW title was not on the line 3/19 ...
but i am more confused on the SFW standing why is there no champion, I thought Erik was the champ at SFW before MAB took it away from him, who was the last one to hold this title at SFW ???
whoever wants this privilege should fight for it.
true No. 1 & No. 2 should fight to be champion ...
but buddy IMHO, PAC & JMM are miles ahead of the other contenders at FW, they should and they must fight again ...
i also think if PAC will officially stay at 130 by figthing his next bout at SFW, his RING BELT at FW be passed on to the next champion (JMM) ...
whoever wants this privilege should fight for it.
i was just joshing with you Sturm.
Not for me he didnt Nard hopkins elevation is in longevity, consistency and deciation over the years not any one fight in my book.
His best win remains Tito, not del la hoya.
Sturm I think is ok though for the record he is up there with the challengers and has as good a chance as say Taylor in taking over the division in my view. Just dont like being called a bitch ;) :D
Shut up bitch!
sincerely,
marvdaverules :D
just like how B-hop elevated his career agsint a blown up welterweight?
i was just joshing with you Sturm.
Not for me he didnt Nard hopkins elevation is in longevity, consistency and deciation over the years not any one fight in my book.
His best win remains Tito, not del la hoya.
Sturm I think is ok though for the record he is up there with the challengers and has as good a chance as say Taylor in taking over the division in my view. Just dont like being called a bitch ;) :D
PAC got his RING belt when he beat MAB, if TITO beats Winky, he should get his belt, thats how i thought ring gets their champ, by beating the current champ ...
Yeah but did Morales win Paq's belt when he beat him? I'm not sure. The problem is I think that the Ring rules were assuming that contenders from the same weight class would fight each other exclusively. If you wanted to fight for a belt, you had to officially step up to that weight class, like Oscar did. I'm not sure if they counted on people fighting guys outside their weight classes in one-time specialty fights, at least not when titles were on the line.
There was a bit of confusion I think with guys changing weights and fighting in different classes than where they were officially listed. It's still a strange situation now...Pacquiao has a belt, while Morales doesn't.
The thing is I don't think that The Ring's got formal rules for sitautions like when Paq moved up to fight Morales. I know they said it wasn't a title fight but I don't know if Ring was part of that discussion or not, since their belts are handed out according to hard and fast rules as opposed to sanctioning body politics.
In a few months when Tito fights Winky it will be the same situation. Will Tito gets Winky's Ring belt if he wins? Probably not, I guess :confused: .
PAC got his RING belt when he beat MAB, if TITO beats Winky, he should get his belt, thats how i thought ring gets their champ, by beating the current champ ...
I didn't know that the Ring's Jr.Lightweight belt was vacant...what's the story on that? One would think the no-brain champ would be Barrera after his win over Morales...
I guess it will be on the line for either Barrera-Morales IV or Barrera-Pacquiao II...
There was a bit of confusion I think with guys changing weights and fighting in different classes than where they were officially listed. It's still a strange situation now...Pacquiao has a belt, while Morales doesn't.
The thing is I don't think that The Ring's got formal rules for sitautions like when Paq moved up to fight Morales. I know they said it wasn't a title fight but I don't know if Ring was part of that discussion or not, since their belts are handed out according to hard and fast rules as opposed to sanctioning body politics.
In a few months when Tito fights Winky it will be the same situation. Will Tito gets Winky's Ring belt if he wins? Probably not, I guess :confused: .
the only person who is a bitch mate is you for your constant hyping of an average middleweight who made his name when getting robbed against a blown up welterweight. :D :D
u started it bitch. ;)
just like how B-hop elevated his career agsint a blown up welterweight?
Champion: Bernard Hopkins
1. Felix Sturm
2. Howard Eastman
3. Oscar De La Hoya
4. Felix Trinidad
5. Jermain Taylor
6. Robert Allen
7. Maselino Masoe
8. Kingsley Ikeke
9. Sam Soliman
10. Arthur Abraham
readt it and weep bitches
the only person who is a bitch mate is you for your constant hyping of an average middleweight who made his name when getting robbed against a blown up welterweight. :D :D
u started it bitch. ;)
Champion: Bernard Hopkins
1. Felix Sturm
2. Howard Eastman
3. Oscar De La Hoya
4. Felix Trinidad
5. Jermain Taylor
6. Robert Allen
7. Maselino Masoe
8. Kingsley Ikeke
9. Sam Soliman
10. Arthur Abraham
readt it and weep bitches
That's pretty easy to understand for me. He's only beaten Chop Chop and freakin' Bruseles at 147 so how could he be ranked ahead of Gatti or Harris, who are more established at 147, and much less Tsyzu, by far and away the real champ of the division?
I'd take Harris and Tszyu over Mayweather, but PBF should handle Gatti easily as long as he doesn't get caught or loses his head and decides to trade. I think that's Gatti's best option, irritate PBF with rough tactics enough to anger him and urge him to get into the pocket.
147 is loaded right now; I'd love to see Harris-Cotto, PBF-Tszyu, PBF-Cotto, Harris-Tszyu, Gatti-Harris, not to mention Witter against all those guys...
....Good analysis and I can't disagree with anything you said. :)
That's pretty easy to understand for me. He's only beaten Chop Chop and freakin' Bruseles at 147 so how could he be ranked ahead of Gatti or Harris, who are more established at 147, and much less Tsyzu, by far and away the real champ of the division?
I'd take Harris and Tszyu over Mayweather, but PBF should handle Gatti easily as long as he doesn't get caught or loses his head and decides to trade. I think that's Gatti's best option, irritate PBF with rough tactics enough to anger him and urge him to get into the pocket.
147 is loaded right now; I'd love to see Harris-Cotto, PBF-Tszyu, PBF-Cotto, Harris-Tszyu, Gatti-Harris, not to mention Witter against all those guys...
Oh and how could I forget Tsyzu-Cotto...